Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 477

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Comparisons of the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) X CO 2 measurements with TCCON

Open access
Wunch, Debra, Wennberg, Paul O., Osterman, Gregory, Fisher, Brendan, Naylor, Bret, Roehl, Coleen M., O'Dell, Christopher, Mandrake, Lukas, Viatte, Camille, Kiel, Matthäus, Griffith, David W. T., Deutscher, Nicholas M., Velazco, Voltaire A., Notholt, Justus, Warneke, Thorsten, Petri, Christof, De Maziere, Martine, Sha, Mahesh K., Sussmann, Ralf, Rettinger, Markus, Pollard, David, Robinson, John, Morino, Isamu, Uchino, Osamu, Hase, Frank, Blumenstock, Thomas, Feist, Dietrich G., Arnold, Sabrina G., Strong, Kimberly, Mendonca, Joseph, Kivi, Rigel, Heikkinen, Pauli, Iraci, Laura, Podolske, James, Hillyard, Patrick W., Kawakami, Shuji, Dubey, Manvendra K., Parker, Harrison A., Sepulveda, Eliezer, García, Omaira E., Te, Yao, Jeseck, Pascal, Gunson, Michael R., Crisp, David, Eldering, Annmarie·2017·Atmospheric Measurement Techniques

Abstract

Abstract. NASA's Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) has been measuring carbon dioxide column-averaged dry-air mole fraction, XCO2, in the Earth's atmosphere for over 2 years. In this paper, we describe the comparisons between the first major release of the OCO-2 retrieval algorithm (B7r) and XCO2 from OCO-2's primary ground-based validation network: the Total Carbon Column Observing Network (TCCON). The OCO-2 XCO2 retrievals, after filtering and bias correction, agree well when aggregated around and coincident with TCCON data in nadir, glint, and target observation modes, with absolute median differences less than 0.4 ppm and RMS differences less than 1.5 ppm. After bias correction, residual biases remain. These biases appear to depend on latitude, surface properties, and scattering by aerosols. It is thus crucial to continue measurement comparisons with TCCON to monitor and evaluate the OCO-2 XCO2 data quality throughout its mission.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5194/amt-10-2209-2017

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 477

Metadata

Authors
Wunch, D., Wennberg, P. O., Osterman, G., Fisher, B., Naylor, B., Roehl, C. M., O'Dell, C., Mandrake, L., Viatte, C., Kiel, M., Griffith, D. W. T., Deutscher, N. M., Velazco, V. A., Notholt, J., Warneke, T., Petri, C., De Maziere, M., Sha, M. K., Sussmann, R., Rettinger, M., Pollard, D., Robinson, J., Morino, I., Uchino, O., Hase, F., Blumenstock, T., Feist, D. G., Arnold, S. G., Strong, K., Mendonca, J., Kivi, R., Heikkinen, P., Iraci, L., Podolske, J., Hillyard, P. W., Kawakami, S., Dubey, M. K., Parker, H. A., Sepulveda, E., García, O. E., Te, Y., Jeseck, P., Gunson, M. R., Crisp, D., & Eldering, A.
Venue
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Published
2017-06-13
Volume
10
Issue
6
Pages
2209-2238
ISSN
  • 1867-1381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1867-8548
OpenAlex
W2508427873
Cited by
477
References
0
FWCI
22.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparisons of the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) X CO 2 measurements with TCCON. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5194/amt-10-2209-2017
The paper
Wunch, D., Wennberg, P. O., Osterman, G., Fisher, B., Naylor, B., Roehl, C. M., O'Dell, C., Mandrake, L., Viatte, C., Kiel, M., Griffith, D. W. T., Deutscher, N. M., Velazco, V. A., Notholt, J., Warneke, T., Petri, C., De Maziere, M., Sha, M. K., Sussmann, R., . . . Eldering, A. (2017). Comparisons of the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) X CO 2 measurements with TCCON. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-2209-2017

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.