The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A machine learning calibration model using random forests to improve sensor performance for lower-cost air quality monitoring
Open accessAbstract
Abstract. Low-cost sensing strategies hold the promise of denser air quality monitoring networks, which could significantly improve our understanding of personal air pollution exposure. Additionally, low-cost air quality sensors could be deployed to areas where limited monitoring exists. However, low-cost sensors are frequently sensitive to environmental conditions and pollutant cross-sensitivities, which have historically been poorly addressed by laboratory calibrations, limiting their utility for monitoring. In this study, we investigated different calibration models for the Real-time Affordable Multi-Pollutant (RAMP) sensor package, which measures CO, NO2, O3, and CO2. We explored three methods: (1) laboratory univariate linear regression, (2) empirical multiple linear regression, and (3) machine-learning-based calibration models using random forests (RF). Calibration models were developed for 16–19 RAMP monitors (varied by pollutant) using training and testing windows spanning August 2016 through February 2017 in Pittsburgh, PA, US. The random forest models matched (CO) or significantly outperformed (NO2, CO2, O3) the other calibration models, and their accuracy and precision were robust over time for testing windows of up to 16 weeks. Following calibration, average mean absolute error on the testing data set from the random forest models was 38 ppb for CO (14 % relative error), 10 ppm for CO2 (2 % relative error), 3.5 ppb for NO2 (29 % relative error), and 3.4 ppb for O3 (15 % relative error), and Pearson r versus the reference monitors exceeded 0.8 for most units. Model performance is explored in detail, including a quantification of model variable importance, accuracy across different concentration ranges, and performance in a range of monitoring contexts including the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and the US EPA Air Sensors Guidebook recommendations of minimum data quality for personal exposure measurement. A key strength of the RF approach is that it accounts for pollutant cross-sensitivities. This highlights the importance of developing multipollutant sensor packages (as opposed to single-pollutant monitors); we determined this is especially critical for NO2 and CO2. The evaluation reveals that only the RF-calibrated sensors meet the US EPA Air Sensors Guidebook recommendations of minimum data quality for personal exposure measurement. We also demonstrate that the RF-model-calibrated sensors could detect differences in NO2 concentrations between a near-road site and a suburban site less than 1.5 km away. From this study, we conclude that combining RF models with carefully controlled state-of-the-art multipollutant sensor packages as in the RAMP monitors appears to be a very promising approach to address the poor performance that has plagued low-cost air quality sensors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
Conditional variable importance for random forests
Strobl, C., Boulesteix, A.-L., Kneib, T., Augustin, T., & Zeileis, A. (2008) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-9-307 · Cited by 3,254
Castell, N., Dauge, F. R., Schneider, P., Vogt, M., Lerner, U., Fishbain, B., Broday, D., & Bartonova, A. (2017) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2016.12.007 · Cited by 1,039
The Changing Paradigm of Air Pollution Monitoring
Snyder, E. G., Watkins, T. H., Solomon, P. A., Thoma, E. D., Williams, R. W., Hagler, G. S. W., Shelow, D., Hindin, D. A., Kilaru, V. J., & Preuss, P. W. (2013) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es4022602 · Cited by 974
How Many Trees in a Random Forest?
Oshiro, T. M., Perez, P. S., & Baranauskas, J. A. (2012) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-31537-4_13 · Cited by 912
Mead, M. I., Popoola, O. A. M., Stewart, G. B., Landshoff, P., Calleja, M., Hayes, M., Baldovi, J. J., McLeod, M. W., Hodgson, T. F., Dicks, J., et al. (2013) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.11.060 · Cited by 828
Effectiveness of Green Infrastructure for Improvement of Air Quality in Urban Street Canyons
Pugh, T. A. M., MacKenzie, A. R., Whyatt, J. D., & Hewitt, C. N. (2012) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es300826w · Cited by 666
De Vito, S., Massera, E., Piga, M., Martinotto, L., & Di Francia, G. (2008) · Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical · doi:10.1016/j.snb.2007.09.060 · Cited by 544
Jiao, W., Hagler, G., Williams, R., Sharpe, R., Brown, R., Garver, D., Judge, R., Caudill, M., Rickard, J., Davis, M., et al. (2016) · Atmospheric Measurement Techniques · doi:10.5194/amt-9-5281-2016 · Cited by 484
Spinelle, L., Gerboles, M., Villani, M. G., Aleixandre, M., & Bonavitacola, F. (2015) · Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical · doi:10.1016/j.snb.2015.03.031 · Cited by 474
Cited by
Giordano, M. R., Malings, C., Pandis, S. N., Presto, A. A., McNeill, V. F., Westervelt, D. M., Beekmann, M., & Subramanian, R. (2021) · Journal of Aerosol Science · doi:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2021.105833 · Cited by 426
Self-citationComparative Analysis of Machine Learning Techniques for Predicting Air Quality in Smart Cities
Ameer, S., Shah, M. A., Khan, A., Song, H., Maple, C., Islam, S. U., & Asghar, M. N. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2925082 · Cited by 293
Okafor, N. U., Alghorani, Y., & Delaney, D. T. (2020) · ICT Express · doi:10.1016/j.icte.2020.06.004 · Cited by 147
Assessment of air quality sensor system performance after relocation
Zauli-Sajani, S., Marchesi, S., Pironi, C., Barbieri, C., Poluzzi, V., & Colacci, A. (2021) · Atmospheric Pollution Research · doi:10.1016/j.apr.2020.11.010 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Zimmerman, N., Presto, A. A., Kumar, S. P. N., Gu, J., Hauryliuk, A., Robinson, E. S., Robinson, A. L., & Subramanian, R.
- Venue
- Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
- Publisher
- Copernicus GmbH
- Published
- 2018-01-15
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 291-313
- ISSN
- 1867-1381 (ISSN-L)
- 1867-8548
- OpenAlex
- W2784031884
- Cited by
- 566
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 24.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A machine learning calibration model using random forests to improve sensor performance for lower-cost air quality monitoring. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5194/amt-11-291-2018
- The paper
- Zimmerman, N., Presto, A. A., Kumar, S. P. N., Gu, J., Hauryliuk, A., Robinson, E. S., Robinson, A. L., & Subramanian, R. (2018). A machine learning calibration model using random forests to improve sensor performance for lower-cost air quality monitoring. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-291-2018
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.