Supplementary material to "Uncertainty in Amazon vegetation productivity in CMIP6 projections driven by surface energy fluxes"
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
ENSO is an important driver of climate variability in the Amazon basin, influencing temperature, precipitation and ecosystem dynamics.
“The ENSO is an important driver of climate variability in the Amazon basin, influencing temperature, precipitation and ecosystem dynamics [66][67][68] .”
From Amazon dieback beyond the 21st century under high-emission scenarios by Earth System models (2025) · cites this paper as [66]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The Beijing Climate Center Climate System Model (BCC-CSM): the main progress from CMIP5 to CMIP6
Wu, T., Lu, Y., Fang, Y., Xin, X., Li, L., Li, W., Jie, W., Zhang, J., Liu, Y., Zhang, L., et al. (2019) · Geoscientific Model Development · doi:10.5194/gmd-12-1573-2019 · Cited by 1,069 · see citing works
Jung, M., Schwalm, C., Migliavacca, M., Walther, S., Camps-Valls, G., Koirala, S., Anthoni, P., Besnard, S., Bodesheim, P., Carvalhais, N., et al. (2020) · Biogeosciences · doi:10.5194/bg-17-1343-2020 · Cited by 866 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- Boucher, O., Servonnat, J., Albright, A.L., Aumont, O., Balkanski, Y., Bastrikov, V., Bekki, S., Bonnet, R., Bony, S. and Bopp, L. (2020) 'Presentation and evaluation of the IPSL-CM6A-LR climate model', Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 12(7), p. e2019MS002010.
- Burrows, S.M., Maltrud, M., Yang, X., Zhu, Q., Jeffery, N., Shi, X., Ricciuto, D., Wang, S., Bisht, G. and Tang, J. (2020) 'The DOE E3SM v1. 1 biogeochemistry configuration: Description and simulated ecosystem-climate responses to historical 180 changes in forcing', Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 12(9), p. e2019MS001766.
- Danabasoglu, G., Lamarque, J.-F., Bacmeister, J., Bailey, D.A., DuVivier, A.K., Edwards, J., Emmons, L.K., Fasullo, J., Garcia, R. and Gettelman, A. (2020) 'The community earth system model version 2 (CESM2)', Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 12(2), p. e2019MS001916.
- Hajima, T., Watanabe, M., Yamamoto, A., Tatebe, H., Noguchi, M.A., Abe, M., Ohgaito, R., Ito, A., Yamazaki, D. and 185 Okajima, H. (2020) 'Development of the MIROC-ES2L Earth system model and the evaluation of biogeochemical processes and feedbacks', Geoscientific Model Development, 13(5), pp. 2197-2244.
- Jung, M., Koirala, S., Weber, U., Ichii, K., Gans, F., Camps-Valls, G., Papale, D., Schwalm, C., Tramontana, G. and Reichstein, M. (2019) 'The FLUXCOM ensemble of global land-atmosphere energy fluxes', Scientific data, 6(1), pp. 1-14.
- Lovato, T., Peano, D., Butenschön, M., Materia, S., Iovino, D., Scoccimarro, E., Fogli, P.G., Cherchi, A., Bellucci, A. and Gualdi, S. (2022) 'CMIP6 Simulations With the CMCC Earth System Model (CMCC-ESM2)', Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 14(3), p. e2021MS002814.
- Mauritsen, T., Bader, J., Becker, T., Behrens, J., Bittner, M., Brokopf, R., Brovkin, V., Claussen, M., Crueger, T. and Esch, M. (2019) 'Developments in the MPI-M Earth System Model version 1.2 (MPI-ESM1. 2) and its response to increasing 200 CO2', Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 11(4), pp. 998-1038.
- Monteverde, C., De Sales, F. and Jones, C. (2022) 'Evaluation of the CMIP6 Performance in Simulating Precipitation in the Amazon River Basin', Climate, 10(8), p. 122. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/cli10080122. · DOI
- Ortega, G., Arias, P.A., Villegas, J.C., Marquet, P.A. and Nobre, P. (2021) 'Present-day and future climate over central and South America according to CMIP5/CMIP6 models', International Journal of Climatology [Preprint]. Available at: 205 https://doi.org/10.1002/JOC.7221. · DOI
- Qiao, L., Zuo, Z. and Xiao, D. (2022) 'Evaluation of Soil Moisture in CMIP6 Simulations', Journal of Climate, 35(2), pp. 779-800. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0827. · DOI
- Rayner, N.A.A., Parker, D.E., Horton, E.B., Folland, C.K., Alexander, L.V., Rowell, D.P., Kent, E.C. and Kaplan, A. (2003) 'Global analyses of sea surface temperature, sea ice, and night marine air temperature since the late nineteenth century', 210 Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 108(D14).
- Séférian, R., Nabat, P., Michou, M., Saint-Martin, D., Voldoire, A., Colin, J., Decharme, B., Delire, C., Berthet, S. and Chevallier, M. (2019) 'Evaluation of CNRM earth system model, CNRM-ESM2-1: Role of earth system processes in present-day and future climate', Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 11(12), pp. 4182-4227.
- Seland, Ø., Bentsen, M., Olivié, D., Toniazzo, T., Gjermundsen, A., Graff, L.S., Debernard, J.B., Gupta, A.K., He, Y.-C. and 215 Kirkevåg, A. (2020) 'Overview of the Norwegian Earth System Model (NorESM2) and key climate response of CMIP6 DECK, historical, and scenario simulations', Geoscientific Model Development, 13(12), pp. 6165-6200.
- Sellar, A.A., Jones, C.G., Mulcahy, J.P., Tang, Y., Yool, A., Wiltshire, A., O'connor, F.M., Stringer, M., Hill, R. and Palmieri, J. (2019) 'UKESM1: Description and evaluation of the UK Earth System Model', Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 11(12), pp. 4513-4558. 220
- Swart, N.C., Cole, J.N., Kharin, V.V., Lazare, M., Scinocca, J.F., Gillett, N.P., Anstey, J., Arora, V., Christian, J.R. and Hanna, S. (2019) 'The Canadian earth system model version 5 (CanESM5. 0.3)', Geoscientific Model Development, 12(11), pp. 4823-4873.
- Wang, Y.-C., Hsu, H.-H., Chen, C.-A., Tseng, W.-L., Hsu, P.-C., Lin, C.-W., Chen, Y.-L., Jiang, L.-C., Lee, Y.-C., Liang, H.-C., Chang, W.-M., Lee, W.-L. and Shiu, C.-J. (2021) 'Performance of the Taiwan Earth System Model in Simulating 225 Climate Variability Compared With Observations and CMIP6 Model Simulations', Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 13(7), p. e2020MS002353. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002353. · DOI
- Wild, M., Folini, D., Hakuba, M.Z., Schär, C., Seneviratne, S.I., Kato, S., Rutan, D., Ammann, C., Wood, E.F. and König- Langlo, G. (2015) 'The energy balance over land and oceans: an assessment based on direct observations and CMIP5 climate models', Climate Dynamics, 44(11), pp. 3393-3429. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-014-2430-z. 230 · DOI
- Ziehn, T., Chamberlain, M.A., Law, R.M., Lenton, A., Bodman, R.W., Dix, M., Stevens, L., Wang, Y.-P. and Srbinovsky, J. (2020) 'The Australian earth system model: ACCESS-ESM1. 5', Journal of Southern Hemisphere Earth Systems Science, 235 70(1), pp. 193-214.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Amazon dieback beyond the 21st century under high-emission scenarios by Earth System models
Melnikova, I., Hajima, T., Shiogama, H., Hayashi, M., Ito, A., Nishina, K., Tachiiri, K., & Yokohata, T. (2025) · Communications Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43247-025-02606-5 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mastropierro, M., Peano, D., & Zanchettin, D.
- Publisher
- Copernicus GmbH
- Published
- 2024-03-25
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 2
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review