The DOI matches its Crossref record; 161 of the 161 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The PMIP4 contribution to CMIP6 – Part 1: Overview and over-arching analysis plan
Open accessAbstract
Abstract. This paper is the first of a series of four GMD papers on the PMIP4-CMIP6 experiments. Part 2 (Otto-Bliesner et al., 2017) gives details about the two PMIP4-CMIP6 interglacial experiments, Part 3 (Jungclaus et al., 2017) about the last millennium experiment, and Part 4 (Kageyama et al., 2017) about the Last Glacial Maximum experiment. The mid-Pliocene Warm Period experiment is part of the Pliocene Model Intercomparison Project (PlioMIP) – Phase 2, detailed in Haywood et al. (2016).The goal of the Paleoclimate Modelling Intercomparison Project (PMIP) is to understand the response of the climate system to different climate forcings for documented climatic states very different from the present and historical climates. Through comparison with observations of the environmental impact of these climate changes, or with climate reconstructions based on physical, chemical, or biological records, PMIP also addresses the issue of how well state-of-the-art numerical models simulate climate change. Climate models are usually developed using the present and historical climates as references, but climate projections show that future climates will lie well outside these conditions. Palaeoclimates very different from these reference states therefore provide stringent tests for state-of-the-art models and a way to assess whether their sensitivity to forcings is compatible with palaeoclimatic evidence. Simulations of five different periods have been designed to address the objectives of the sixth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6): the millennium prior to the industrial epoch (CMIP6 name: past1000); the mid-Holocene, 6000 years ago (midHolocene); the Last Glacial Maximum, 21 000 years ago (lgm); the Last Interglacial, 127 000 years ago (lig127k); and the mid-Pliocene Warm Period, 3.2 million years ago (midPliocene-eoi400). These climatic periods are well documented by palaeoclimatic and palaeoenvironmental records, with climate and environmental changes relevant for the study and projection of future climate changes. This paper describes the motivation for the choice of these periods and the design of the numerical experiments and database requests, with a focus on their novel features compared to the experiments performed in previous phases of PMIP and CMIP. It also outlines the analysis plan that takes advantage of the comparisons of the results across periods and across CMIP6 in collaboration with other MIPs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2010) · Intellectum (Universidad de La Sabana) · doi:10.1111/j.1467- · Cited by 16,131
An Overview of CMIP5 and the Experiment Design
Taylor, K. E., Stouffer, R. J., & Meehl, G. A. (2012) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/bams-d-11-00094.1 · Cited by 14,052
Eyring, V., Bony, S., Meehl, G. A., Senior, C. A., Stevens, B., Stouffer, R. J., & Taylor, K. E. (2016) · Geoscientific Model Development · doi:10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016 · Cited by 11,981
A Pliocene‐Pleistocene stack of 57 globally distributed benthic δ18O records
Lisiecki, L. E., & Raymo, M. E. (2005) · Paleoceanography · doi:10.1029/2004pa001071 · Cited by 7,377
A long-term numerical solution for the insolation quantities of the Earth
Laskar, J., Robutel, P., Joutel, F., Gastineau, M., Correia, A. C. M., & Levrard, B. (2004) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20041335 · Cited by 3,837
Global Signatures and Dynamical Origins of the Little Ice Age and Medieval Climate Anomaly
Mann, M. E., Zhang, Z., Rutherford, S., Bradley, R. S., Hughes, M. K., Shindell, D., Ammann, C., Faluvegi, G., & Ni, F. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1177303 · Cited by 2,483
Long-Term Variations of Daily Insolation and Quaternary Climatic Changes
Berger, A. (1978) · Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences · doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1978)035<2362:ltvodi>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 2,459
Sea level and global ice volumes from the Last Glacial Maximum to the Holocene
Lambeck, K., Rouby, H., Purcell, A., Sun, Y., & Sambridge, M. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1411762111 · Cited by 2,215
Contribution of Antarctica to past and future sea-level rise
DeConto, R. M., & Pollard, D. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature17145 · Cited by 2,044
Space geodesy constrains ice age terminal deglaciation: The global ICE‐6G_C (VM5a) model
Peltier, W. R., Argus, D. F., & Drummond, R. (2015) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1002/2014jb011176 · Cited by 1,470
Self-citation
Cited by
Taking climate model evaluation to the next level
Eyring, V., Cox, P. M., Flato, G. M., Gleckler, P. J., Abramowitz, G., Caldwell, P., Collins, W. D., Gier, B. K., Hall, A. D., Hoffman, F. M., et al. (2019) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-018-0355-y · Cited by 748
Dalton, A. S., Margold, M., Stokes, C. R., Tarasov, L., Dyke, A. S., Adams, R. S., Allard, S., Arends, H. E., Atkinson, N., Attig, J. W., et al. (2020) · Quaternary Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2020.106223 · Cited by 374
Self-citationA planetary boundary for green water
Wang-Erlandsson, L., Tobian, A., van der Ent, R. J., Fetzer, I., te Wierik, S., Porkka, M., Staal, A., Jaramillo, F., Dahlmann, H., Singh, C., et al. (2022) · Nature Reviews Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43017-022-00287-8 · Cited by 366
Otto-Bliesner, B. L., Braconnot, P., Harrison, S. P., Lunt, D. J., Abe-Ouchi, A., Albani, S., Bartlein, P. J., Capron, E., Carlson, A. E., Dutton, A., et al. (2017) · Geoscientific Model Development · doi:10.5194/gmd-10-3979-2017 · Cited by 361
Self-citationSmith, D. M., Screen, J. A., Deser, C., Cohen, J., Fyfe, J. C., García-Serrano, J., Jung, T., Kattsov, V., Matei, D., Msadek, R., et al. (2019) · Geoscientific Model Development · doi:10.5194/gmd-12-1139-2019 · Cited by 357
Metadata
- Authors
- Kageyama, M., Braconnot, P., Harrison, S. P., Haywood, A. M., Jungclaus, J. H., Otto-Bliesner, B. L., Peterschmitt, J.-Y., Abe-Ouchi, A., Albani, S., Bartlein, P. J., Brierley, C., Crucifix, M., Dolan, A., Fernandez-Donado, L., Fischer, H., Hopcroft, P. O., Ivanovic, R. F., Lambert, F., Lunt, D. J., Mahowald, N. M., Peltier, W. R., Phipps, S. J., Roche, D. M., Schmidt, G. A., Tarasov, L., Valdes, P. J., Zhang, Q., & Zhou, T.
- Venue
- Geoscientific Model Development
- Publisher
- Copernicus GmbH
- Published
- 2018-03-16
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1033-1057
- ISSN
- 1991-959X (ISSN-L)
- 1991-9603
- OpenAlex
- W2794245781
- Cited by
- 361
- References
- 161
- FWCI
- 14.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The PMIP4 contribution to CMIP6 – Part 1: Overview and over-arching analysis plan. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5194/gmd-11-1033-2018
- The paper
- Kageyama, M., Braconnot, P., Harrison, S. P., Haywood, A. M., Jungclaus, J. H., Otto-Bliesner, B. L., Peterschmitt, J.-Y., Abe-Ouchi, A., Albani, S., Bartlein, P. J., Brierley, C., Crucifix, M., Dolan, A., Fernandez-Donado, L., Fischer, H., Hopcroft, P. O., Ivanovic, R. F., Lambert, F., Lunt, D. J., . . . Zhou, T. (2018). The PMIP4 contribution to CMIP6 – Part 1: Overview and over-arching analysis plan. Geoscientific Model Development. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1033-2018
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.