Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 349

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 93 of the 93 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The global chemistry transport model TM5: description and evaluation of the tropospheric chemistry version 3.0

Open access
Huijnen, V., Williams, J., van Weele, M., van Noije, T., Krol, M., Dentener, F., Segers, A., Houweling, S., Peters, W., de Laat, J., Boersma, F., Bergamaschi, P., van Velthoven, P., Le Sager, P., Eskes, H., Alkemade, F., Scheele, R., Nédélec, P., Pätz, H.-W.·2010·Geoscientific Model Development

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Abstract. We present a comprehensive description and benchmark evaluation of the tropospheric chemistry version of the global chemistry transport model TM5 (Tracer Model 5, version TM5-chem-v3.0). A full description is given concerning the photochemical mechanism, the interaction with aerosol, the treatment of the stratosphere, the wet and dry deposition parameterizations, and the applied emissions. We evaluate the model against a suite of ground-based, satellite, and aircraft measurements of components critical for understanding global photochemistry for the year 2006. The model exhibits a realistic oxidative capacity at a global scale. The methane lifetime is ~8.9 years with an associated lifetime of methyl chloroform of 5.86 years, which is similar to that derived using an optimized hydroxyl radical field. The seasonal cycle in observed carbon monoxide (CO) is well simulated at different regions across the globe. In the Northern Hemisphere CO concentrations are underestimated by about 20 ppbv in spring and 10 ppbv in summer, which is related to missing chemistry and underestimated emissions from higher hydrocarbons, as well as to uncertainties in the seasonal variation of CO emissions. The model also captures the spatial and seasonal variation in formaldehyde tropospheric columns as observed by SCIAMACHY. Positive model biases over the Amazon and eastern United States point to uncertainties in the isoprene emissions as well as its chemical breakdown. Simulated tropospheric nitrogen dioxide columns correspond well to observations from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument in terms of its seasonal and spatial variability (with a global spatial correlation coefficient of 0.89), but TM5 fields are lower by 25–40%. This is consistent with earlier studies pointing to a high bias of 0–30% in the OMI retrievals, but uncertainties in the emission inventories have probably also contributed to the discrepancy. TM5 tropospheric nitrogen dioxide profiles are in good agreement (within ~0.1 ppbv) with in situ aircraft observations from the INTEX-B campaign over (the Gulf of) Mexico. The model reproduces the spatial and seasonal variation in background surface ozone concentrations and tropospheric ozone profiles from the World Ozone and Ultraviolet Radiation Data Centre to within 10 ppbv, but at several tropical stations the model tends to underestimate ozone in the free troposphere. The presented model results benchmark the TM5 tropospheric chemistry version, which is currently in use in several international cooperation activities, and upon which future model improvements will take place.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5194/gmd-3-445-2010

Cites

93 of 93 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 93 references

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. Bregman, B., Segers, A., Krol, M., Meijer, E., and van Velthoven, P.: On the use of mass-conserving wind fields in chemistry-transport models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 3, 447–457, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-447-2003, 2003. · doi:10.5194/acp-3-447-2003
  2. de Laat, A. T. J., van der A, R. J., and van Weele, M.: Evaluation of tropospheric ozone columns derived from assimilated GOME ozone profile observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 8105–8120, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-8105-2009, 2009. · doi:10.5194/acp-9-8105-2009
  3. Elterman, L.: UV, visible and IR attenuation for altitudes to 50 km, Environmental Research Papers, No. 285, Report 68-0153, Air Force Cambridge Research Laboratories, Bedford, Massachusetts, United States, 1968.
  4. Ganzeveld, L., Lelieveld, J., and Roelofs, G.-J.: A dry deposition parameterization for sulfur oxides in a chemistry and general circulation model, J. Geophys. Res., 103(D5), 5679–5694, https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD03077, 1998. · doi:10.1029/97jd03077
  5. Guelle, W., Balkanski, Y. J., Schulz, M., Dulac, F., and Monfray, P.: Wet deposition in a global size-dependent aerosol transport model 1. Comparison of a 1 year 210Pb simulation with ground measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 103(D10), 11429–11446, https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD03680, 1998. · doi:10.1029/97jd03680
  6. Heimann, M., Monfray, P., and Polian, G.: Long-range transport of 222Rn- a test for 3D tracer models, Chem. Geol., 70, 98–98, 1988. · doi:10.1016/0009-2541(88)90476-7
  7. Hains, J., Boersma, K. F., Kroon, M., et al.: Testing and improving OMI DOMINO tropospheric NO2 using observations from the DANDELIONS and INTEX-B validation campaigns, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D05301, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012399, 2010. · doi:10.1029/2009jd012399
  8. Hales, J. M. and Drewes, D. R.: Solubility of ammonia in water at low concentrations, Atmos. Environ., 13, 1133–1147, 1979. · doi:10.1016/0004-6981(79)90037-4
  9. Hertel, O., Berkowicz, R., and Christensen, J.: Test of two numerical schemes for use in atmospheric transport-chemistry models Atmos. Environ., 27A(16), 2591–2611, 1993. · doi:10.1016/0960-1686(93)90032-t
  10. Huang, H.-C. and Chang, J. S.: On the performance of numerical solvers for a chemistry submodel in three-dimensional air quality models 1. Box model simulations, J. Geophys. Res., 106, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD000121, 2001. · doi:10.1029/2000jd000121
  11. Huijnen, V., Eskes, H. J., Poupkou, A., Elbern, H., Boersma, K. F., Foret, G., Sofiev, M., Valdebenito, A., Flemming, J., Stein, O., Gross, A., Robertson, L., D'Isidoro, M., Kioutsioukis, I., Friese, E., Amstrup, B., Bergstrom, R., Strunk, A., Vira, J., Zyryanov, D., Maurizi, A., Melas, D., Peuch, V.-H., and Zerefos, C.: Comparison of OMI NO2 tropospheric columns with an ensemble of global and European regional air quality models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 3273–3296, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-3273-2010, 2010. · doi:10.5194/acp-10-3273-2010
  12. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change): Special report on aviation and the global atmosphere, edited by: Penner, J. E., Lister, D. H., Griggs, D. J., Dokken, D. J., and McFarland, M., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 373 pp., 1999.
  13. Jeuken, A., Veefkind, J. P., Dentener, F., Metzger, S., and Gonzalez, C. R.: Simulation of the aerosol optical depth over Europe for August 1997 and a comparison with observations, J. Geophys. Res., 106(D22), 28295–28311, 2001. · doi:10.1029/2001jd900063
  14. De Laat, A. T. J., Landgraf, J., Aben, I., Hasekamp, O., and Bregman, B.: Validation of Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment ozone profiles and evaluation of stratospheric transport in a global chemistry transport model, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D05301, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006789, 2007. · doi:10.1029/2005jd006789
  15. Labonne, M., Breon, F.-M., and Chevallier, F.: Injection heights of biomass burning aerosols as seen from a space borne lidar, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L11806, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL029311, 2007. · doi:10.1029/2007gl029311
  16. Lamsal, L. N., Martin, R. V., Van Donkelaar, A., Celarier, E. A., Bucsela, E. J., Boersma, K. F., Dirksen, R., Luo, C., and Wang, Y.: Indirect validation of tropospheric nitrogen dioxide retrieved from the OMI satellite instrument: Insight into the seasonal variation of nitrogen oxides at Northern midlatitudes, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D05302, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013351, 2010. · doi:10.1029/2009jd013351
  17. Law, R. M., Peters, W., Rödenbeck, C., et al.: TransCom model simulations of hourly atmospheric CO2: Experimental overview and diurnal cycle results for 2002, Global Biogeochem Cy., 22, GB3009, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GB003050, 2008. · doi:10.1029/2007gb003050
  18. Metzger, S., Dentener, F., Krol, M. C., Jeuken, A., and Lelieveld, J.: Gas/aerosol partitioning 2. Global modeling results, J. Geophys. Res., 107(D16), 4313, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001103, 2002. · doi:10.1029/2001jd001103
  19. Perring, A. E., Bertram, T. H., Farmer, D. K., Wooldridge, P. J., Dibb, J., Blake, N. J., Blake, D. R., Singh, H. B., Fuelberg, H., Diskin, G., Sachse, G., and Cohen, R. C.: The production and persistence of $§igma$RONO2 in the Mexico City plume, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7215–7229, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7215-2010, 2010. · doi:10.5194/acp-10-7215-2010
  20. Prather, M., Ehhalt, D., Dentener, F., et al.: Atmospheric chemistry and greenhouse gases, in: Climate Change 2001: The scientific basis, contribution of working group 1 to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Houghton, J. T., Ding, Y., Griggs, D.J., et al., pp. 239–288, Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 2001.
  21. Schmitt, C. G. and Heymsfield, A. J.: Total surface area estimates for individual ice particles and particle populations, J. Appl. Meteorol., 44, 467–474, 2005. · doi:10.1175/jam2209.1
  22. Segers, A., van Velthoven, P., Bregman, B., and Krol, M.: On the computation of mass fluxes for Eulerian transport models from spectral meteorological fields, in: Proceedings of the 2002 International Conference on Computational Science, edited by: Sloot, P., Tan, C. K., Dongarra, J., and Hoekstra, A., volume 2330/2002 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS), pages 767–776, Springer Verlag, 2002. · doi:10.1007/3-540-46080-2_81
  23. van den Broek, M. M. P., van Aalst, M. K., Bregman, A., Krol, M., Lelieveld, J., Toon, G. C., Garcelon, S., Hansford, G. M., Jones, R. L., and Gardiner, T. D.: The impact of model grid zooming on tracer transport in the 1999/2000 Arctic polar vortex, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 3, 1833–1847, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-1833-2003, 2003. · doi:10.5194/acp-3-1833-2003
  24. Zhou, X. and Mopper, K.: Apparent partition coefficients of 15 carbonyl compounds between air and seawater and air and freshwater; Implications for air-sea exchange, Environ. Sci. Technol., 24(12), 1864–1869, 1990. · doi:10.1021/es00082a013
  25. Zhou, Y., Brunner, D., Boersma, K. F., Dirksen, R., and Wang, P.: An improved tropospheric NO2 retrieval for OMI observations in the vicinity of mountainous terrain, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 2, 401–416, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2-401-2009, 2009. · doi:10.5194/amt-2-401-2009

Cited by

See all 349

Metadata

Authors
Huijnen, V., Williams, J., van Weele, M., van Noije, T., Krol, M., Dentener, F., Segers, A., Houweling, S., Peters, W., de Laat, J., Boersma, F., Bergamaschi, P., van Velthoven, P., Le Sager, P., Eskes, H., Alkemade, F., Scheele, R., Nédélec, P., & Pätz, H.-W.
Venue
Geoscientific Model Development
Published
2010-10-06
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
445-473
ISSN
  • 1991-959X (ISSN-L)
  • 1991-9603
OpenAlex
W1983086210
Cited by
349
References
93
FWCI
7.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The global chemistry transport model TM5: description and evaluation of the tropospheric chemistry version 3.0. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5194/gmd-3-445-2010
The paper
Huijnen, V., Williams, J., van Weele, M., van Noije, T., Krol, M., Dentener, F., Segers, A., Houweling, S., Peters, W., de Laat, J., Boersma, F., Bergamaschi, P., van Velthoven, P., Le Sager, P., Eskes, H., Alkemade, F., Scheele, R., Nédélec, P., & Pätz, H.-W. (2010). The global chemistry transport model TM5: description and evaluation of the tropospheric chemistry version 3.0. Geoscientific Model Development. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-3-445-2010

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.