The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 4 of the 8 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? – Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Abstract. Both the root mean square error (RMSE) and the mean absolute error (MAE) are regularly employed in model evaluation studies. Willmott and Matsuura (2005) have suggested that the RMSE is not a good indicator of average model performance and might be a misleading indicator of average error, and thus the MAE would be a better metric for that purpose. While some concerns over using RMSE raised by Willmott and Matsuura (2005) and Willmott et al. (2009) are valid, the proposed avoidance of RMSE in favor of MAE is not the solution. Citing the aforementioned papers, many researchers chose MAE over RMSE to present their model evaluation statistics when presenting or adding the RMSE measures could be more beneficial. In this technical note, we demonstrate that the RMSE is not ambiguous in its meaning, contrary to what was claimed by Willmott et al. (2009). The RMSE is more appropriate to represent model performance than the MAE when the error distribution is expected to be Gaussian. In addition, we show that the RMSE satisfies the triangle inequality requirement for a distance metric, whereas Willmott et al. (2009) indicated that the sums-of-squares-based statistics do not satisfy this rule. In the end, we discussed some circumstances where using the RMSE will be more beneficial. However, we do not contend that the RMSE is superior over the MAE. Instead, a combination of metrics, including but certainly not limited to RMSEs and MAEs, are often required to assess model performance.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This technical note argues against the recommendation by Willmott and Matsuura (2005) and Willmott et al. (2009) to abandon RMSE in favor of MAE, showing that RMSE is not ambiguous in meaning and is more appropriate when errors are expected to be Gaussian. The authors also demonstrate that RMSE satisfies the triangle inequality required of a distance metric, contrary to the earlier claims, while concluding that a combination of metrics is often needed.
Key findings
- RMSE is not ambiguous in its meaning, contrary to Willmott et al. (2009); it is more appropriate than MAE when the error distribution is expected to be Gaussian, whereas MAE suits uniformly distributed errors.
- Using randomly generated zero-mean, unit-variance Gaussian pseudo-errors, RMSEs converge to the true standard deviation (SE = 1) once n ≥ 100, with standard deviation within 5% of truth; MAEs converge to 0.8, approximating the expectation of √(2/π). Neither metric is robust at n = 4 or n = 10.
- RMSE satisfies the triangle inequality required for a distance metric: the example in Willmott et al. (2009) (d(a,c)=4, d(a,b)=2, d(b,c)=3) actually represents the MSE, not the RMSE, and the L2-norm proof in Eqs. (5)–(7) shows RMSE does satisfy it.
- RMSE has practical advantages: it avoids absolute values (useful for gradients/sensitivities and data assimilation cost functions) and is generally better at discriminating among model results by weighting unfavorable conditions more heavily.
Methods
- Technical note / commentary design: no new observational dataset; the argument is analytical, using norm theory (L1- and L2-norms linked to MAE and RMSE) and a proof of the triangle inequality for the L2-norm.
- A Monte Carlo-style demonstration: five sets of pseudo-errors of size n = 4, 10, 100, 1000, 10 000, and 1000 000 drawn from a zero-mean, unit-variance Gaussian distribution with different random seeds, comparing RMSEs and MAEs (Table 1).
- Reference to prior empirical example: Chai et al. (2009) reported RMSE-to-MAE ratios of 1.63 to 2.29 for model NO2 column predictions versus SCIAMACHY satellite observations.
Limitations
- Stated by the authors: the analysis assumes unbiased errors and does not consider uncertainties from observation errors or the method used to compare model and observations; all statistics are less useful with limited sample sizes (e.g., n = 4 or 10), where presenting the errors themselves may be more appropriate; for non-normal distributions, additional moments (mean, variance, skewness, flatness) are needed; outliers several orders larger than other samples may justifiably be removed when sample numbers are limited, and systematic errors may need removal before computing RMSEs.
- Evident from the text: the demonstration relies on synthetic Gaussian pseudo-errors rather than real model–observation comparisons, so the convergence results are conditional on the Gaussian assumption; the authors explicitly do not claim RMSE is superior to MAE, so the note offers guidance rather than a definitive metric selection rule.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
14 Own interpretation · 6 No basis given · 4 Supported · 3 Sources not found · 3 Own result · 1 No full text of the sources · 1 Not checked yet
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Using hypothetical sets of four errors, Willmott and Matsuura (2005) demonstrated that while keeping the MAE as a constant of 2.0, the RMSE varies from 2.0 to 4.0.”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 1 Introduction
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Willmott and Matsuura (2005) source
Table 1 identifies five hypothetical sets of four errors, and Section 3 says their RMSE increases as the error magnitudes become more variable. The paper gives the bounds as MAE ≤ RMSE ≤ √n × MAE; with four errors and an MAE of 2.0, those bounds are 2.0 and 4.0. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)
boostedstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, we show that the RMSE satisfies the triangle inequality requirement for a distance metric, whereas Willmott et al. (2009) indicated that the sums-ofsquares-based statistics do not satisfy this rule.”
- Also stated in: § 3 Triangle inequality of a metric · boosted
“This proves that RMSE satisfies the triangle inequality required for a distance function metric.”
- Also stated in: § 4 Summary and discussion · boosted
“In addition, we demonstrate that the RMSE satisfies the triangle inequality required for a distance function metric.”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > Abstract
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 3 Triangle inequality of a metric · boosted
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“When the sample size reaches 100 or above, using the calculated RMSEs one can re-construct the error distribution close to its “truth” or “exact solution”, with its standard deviation within 5 % to its truth (i.e., SE = 1).”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 2 Interpretation of RMSE and MAE
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The errors are unbiased and follow a normal distribution when presenting the RMSE.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The uncertainties brought in by observation errors or the method used to compare model and observations are not considered.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For instance, Table 1 shows that neither the RMSEs nor the MAEs are robust when only 4 or 10 samples are used to calculate those values.”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 2 Interpretation of RMSE and MAE
plainn = 10- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The errors are unbiased and follow a normal distribution when presenting the RMSE.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The uncertainties brought in by observation errors or the method used to compare model and observations are not considered.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The RMSE is more appropriate to represent model performance than the MAE when the error distribution is expected to be Gaussian.”
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · plain
“When the error distribution is expected to be Gaussian and there are enough samples, the RMSE has an advantage over the MAE to illustrate the error distribution.”
- Also stated in: § 4 Summary and discussion · plain
“We present that the RMSE is not ambiguous in its meaning, and it is more appropriate to use than the MAE when model errors follow a normal distribution.”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Model errors are likely to have a normal distribution rather than a uniform distribution.
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · plain
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Giving higher weighting to the unfavorable conditions, the RMSE usually is better at revealing model performance differences.”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 4 Summary and discussion
hedgedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The L1-norm and L2-norm are closely related to the MAE and the RMSE, respectively, as shown in Eqs. ( 3) and ( 4): Horn and Johnson, 1990).”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 3 Triangle inequality of a metric
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Horn and Johnson, 1990
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
In the paper
“In this technical note, we demonstrate that the RMSE is not ambiguous in its meaning, contrary to what was claimed by Willmott et al. (2009).”
- Also stated in: § 4 Summary and discussion · plain
“We present that the RMSE is not ambiguous in its meaning, and it is more appropriate to use than the MAE when model errors follow a normal distribution.”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Willmott et al. (2009)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 4 Summary and discussion · plain
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“One distinct advantage of RMSEs over MAEs is that RM-SEs avoid the use of absolute value, which is highly undesirable in many mathematical calculations.”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 4 Summary and discussion
boostedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Similarly, one can readily show that, for several sets of errors with the same RMSE, the MAE would vary from set to set.”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 1 Introduction
hedgedstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 10
- It may state two separate claims as one. 2
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“They summarized that the RMSE tends to become increasingly larger than the MAE (but not necessarily in a monotonic fashion) as the distribution of error magnitudes becomes more variable.”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 1 Introduction
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Willmott and Matsuura (2005) source
The Concluding Remarks state the attributed point directly, including the qualification that the increase need not be monotonic. (LLM, conf=0.95)
hedgedstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“They concluded that the RMSE varies with the variability of the the error magnitudes and the total-error or averageerror magnitude (MAE), and the sample size n.”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 1 Introduction
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Willmott and Matsuura (2005) source
The Concluding Remarks state that RMSE depends on error-magnitude variability, MAE, and the square root of sample size. The claim says it varies with sample size n, which accurately conveys that dependence without asserting that the relationship is linear. (LLM, conf=0.93)
boostedstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Willmott and Matsuura (2005) have simply proved that the RMSE is not equivalent to the MAE, and one cannot easily derive the MAE value from the RMSE (and vice versa).”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 1 Introduction
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Willmott and Matsuura (2005) source
Section 3 describes an inconsistent relationship between MAE and RMSE, including cases where RMSE changes with error-magnitude variance. Section 4 explains that RMSE depends on MAE, the distribution of error magnitudes, and the number of errors. This supports the claim that the measures are not equivalent and that one cannot generally derive either value from the other alone. (LLM, conf=0.90)
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Table 1 shows that the MAEs converge to 0.8, an approximation to the expectation of 2 π .”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 2 Interpretation of RMSE and MAE
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The errors are unbiased and follow a normal distribution when presenting the RMSE.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The uncertainties brought in by observation errors or the method used to compare model and observations are not considered.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“When both metrics are calculated, the RMSE is by definition never smaller than the MAE.”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 1 Introduction
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The MAE is suitable to describe uniformly distributed errors.”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 2 Interpretation of RMSE and MAE
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For other kinds of distributions, more statistical moments of model errors, such as mean, variance, skewness, and flatness, are needed to provide a complete picture of the model error variation.”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 4 Summary and discussion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The ratio of RMSE to MAE ranged from 1.63 to 2.29 (see Table 1 of Chai et al., 2009).”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 1 Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Chai et al., 2009 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In many of the model sensitivity studies that use only RMSE, a detailed interpretation is not critical because variations of the same model will have similar error distributions.”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 4 Summary and discussion
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As every statistical measure condenses a large number of data into a single value, it only provides one projection of the model errors emphasizing a certain aspect of the error characteristics of the model performance.”
- Also stated in: § 4 Summary and discussion · plain
“As stated earlier, any single metric provides only one projection of the model errors and, therefore, only emphasizes a certain aspect of the error characteristics.”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 1 Introduction
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Also stated in: § 4 Summary and discussion · plain
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A combination of metrics, including but certainly not limited to RMSEs and MAEs, are often required to assess model performance.”
- Also stated in: § 4 Summary and discussion · plain
“A combination of metrics, including but certainly not limited to RMSEs and MAEs, are often required to assess model performance.”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Also stated in: § 4 Summary and discussion · plain
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While the MAE gives the same weight to all errors, the RMSE penalizes variance as it gives errors with larger absolute values more weight than errors with smaller absolute values.”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 1 Introduction
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The authors state this as an assumption.
The errors are unbiased and follow a normal distribution when presenting the RMSE.
“The underlying assumption when presenting the RMSE is that the errors are unbiased and follow a normal distribution.”
“We also assume the error sample set is unbiased.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Model errors are likely to have a normal distribution rather than a uniform distribution.
“Because model errors are likely to have a normal distribution rather than a uniform distribution, the RMSE is a better metric to present than the MAE for such a type of data.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The uncertainties brought in by observation errors or the method used to compare model and observations are not considered.
“The uncertainties brought in by observation errors or the method used to compare model and observations are not considered here.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There are often hundreds of observations available to calculate model statistics.
“Fortunately, there are often hundreds of observations available to calculate model statistics, unlike the examples with n = 4 (Willmott and Matsuura, 2005) and n = 10 ( Willmott et al., 2009).”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 4 Summary and discussion
“| 4 | 0.92, 0.65, 1.48, 1.02, 0.79 0.70, 0.57, 1.33, 1.16, 0.76 | |”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 1 Introduction
“When both metrics are calculated, the RMSE is by definition never smaller than the MAE.”
Citations
Cites
Horn, R. A., & Johnson, C. R. (1985) · Cited by 22,203
David, F. N., & Tukey, J. W. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529486 · Cited by 12,707
Willmott, C., & Matsuura, K. (2005) · Climate Research · doi:10.3354/cr030079 · Cited by 6,512 · cited 4×
“Further, Willmott et al. (2009) concluded that the sums-of-squaresbased error statistics such as the RMSE and the standard error have inherent ambiguities and recommended the use of alternates such as the MAE.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialHuber, P. J., & Ronchetti, E. M. (2009) · Wiley series in probability and statistics · doi:10.1002/9780470434697 · Cited by 1,823
Ambiguities inherent in sums-of-squares-based error statistics
Willmott, C. J., Matsuura, K., & Robeson, S. M. (2008) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.10.005 · Cited by 212 · cited 1×
“Fortunately, there are often hundreds of observations available to calculate model statistics, unlike the examples with n= 4 (Willmott and Matsuura, 2005) and n= 10 (Willmott et al., 2009).”
BackgroundMcKeen, S. A., Wilczak, J. M., Grell, G., et al. (2005) · Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2005jd005858 · Cited by 208
Savage, N., Agnew, P., Davis, L. S., Ordóñez, C., Thorpe, R., Johnson, C. E., O’Connor, F. M., & Dalvi, M. (2013) · Geoscientific model development · doi:10.5194/gmd-6-353-2013 · Cited by 128
Taylor, M. H., Lösch, M., Wenzel, M., et al. (2013) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/jcli-d-13-00089.1 · Cited by 93
Chai, T., Kim, H. C., Lee, P., et al. (2013) · Geoscientific model development · doi:10.5194/gmd-6-1831-2013 · Cited by 87
Self-citationA multi-physics ensemble of present-day climate regional simulations over the Iberian Peninsula
Jerez, S., Montávez, J. P., Jiménez‐Guerrero, P., et al. (2012) · Climate Dynamics · doi:10.1007/s00382-012-1539-1 · Cited by 80 · cited 2×
“(2009) (e.g., Taylor et al., 2013; Chatterjee et al., 2013; Jerez et al., 2013).”
Method
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 4,001–4,100 of 7,174
A Computational Intelligence-Based Prediction Model for Flight Departure Delays
Hopane, J., & Gatsheni, B. N. (2019) · International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI) · doi:10.1109/csci49370.2019.00107 · Cited by 3
Influence of the Ionospheric Delay on Designation of an Aircraft Position
Ćwiklak, J., Grzegorzewski, M., & Krasuski, K. (2020) · Communications - Scientific letters of the University of Zilina · doi:10.26552/com.c.2020.3.3-10 · Cited by 3
New accurate approximation of the Einstein Relation for heavily-doped semiconductor devices
Alqurashi, A., & Selvakumar, C. R. (2020) · Solid-State Electronics · doi:10.1016/j.sse.2020.107869 · Cited by 3
Prediction of Parking Spaces and Recommendation of Parking Area in Urban Complex
Zhu, D., Song, S., Zhang, H., et al. (2020) · International Conference on Big Data and Internet of Things (BDIOT) · doi:10.1145/3421537.3421540 · Cited by 3
Joo, J. C., Moon, H. S., & Chang, S. W. (2020) · Water · doi:10.3390/w12113103 · Cited by 3
A MACHINE-LEARNING-BASED MODEL FOR FORECASTING MEDICAL DEVICE FOREIGN TRADE
Bayrak, T. (2020) · Eskişehir Technical University Journal of Science and Technology A - Applied Sciences and Engineering · doi:10.18038/estubtda.803546 · Cited by 3
Guo, L. Y., Chang, H., Cheng, X., et al. (2020) · SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series · doi:10.4271/2020-01-5151 · Cited by 3
Prediction of State of Charge (SOC) of Battery Electric Vehicle
Rizianiza, I., & Shoodiqin, D. M. (2021) · Advances in science and technology · doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/ast.104.65 · Cited by 3
A Comparative Study of Student Performance Prediction using Pre-Course Data
Alharbi, B., Assiri, F. Y., & Alharbi, B. (2021) · ADCAIJ ADVANCES IN DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE JOURNAL · doi:10.14201/adcaij20211014961 · Cited by 3
Enhancing the Human Health Status Prediction: The ATHLOS Project
Anagnostou, P., Tasoulis, S. K., Vrahatis, A. G., Georgakopoulos, S. V., Prina, M. A., Ayuso‐Mateos, J. L., Bickenbach, J. E., Bayes‐Marin, I., Caballero, F. F., Egea‐Cortés, L., et al. (2021) · Applied Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1080/08839514.2021.1935591 · Cited by 3
Santos, Y. D. C. D. F., Saqui, D., & Santos, P. C. (2021) · doi:10.1145/3466933.3466948 · Cited by 3
Mobley, F. S., Wall, A. T., & Campbell, S. C. (2021) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/10.0005737 · Cited by 3
TOPBAS, N. K., & Okkesim, A. (2021) · Mersin Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Lokman Hekim Tıp Tarihi ve Folklorik Tıp Dergisi · doi:10.31020/mutftd.958620 · Cited by 3
Apply Machine Learning to Improve Fault Detection and Classification in Cyber Physical System
Tsai, C.-D., & Chiu, M. (2019) · Advances in transdisciplinary engineering · doi:10.3233/atde190159 · Cited by 3
Modeling the Multisector Business Interruption Ratio in Earthquake-Struck Regions
Mao, Q., Li, N., & Fang, D. (2021) · Journal of Management in Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000964 · Cited by 3
Dutta, S., & Dasgupta, K. (2021) · Studies in autonomic, data-driven and industrial computing · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-4301-9_16 · Cited by 3
Amroun, H., Ammi, M., & Hafid, F. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3131391 · Cited by 3
Xiao, R., Wang, Y., Liu, Y., et al. (2021) · Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC) · doi:10.1109/ccdc52312.2021.9601780 · Cited by 3
Long short-term memory prediction for COVID19 time series
Milivojević, M., & Gavrovska, A. M. (2021) · Telfor Journal · doi:10.5937/telfor2102081m · Cited by 3
Custom Methodology to Improve Geospatial Interpolation at Regional Scale with Open-Source Software
Massarelli, C., Campanale, C., & Uricchio, V. F. (2022) · Knowledge · doi:10.3390/knowledge2010005 · Cited by 3
Ly, H., Vu, H.-L. T., Ho, L. S., et al. (2022) · Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering · doi:10.1007/s11709-022-0812-6 · Cited by 3
Modelling and Control of a Dosing Pump for Water Treatment Plants
National Board for Technical Education, K., & Bello, O. (2022) · Engineering and Technology Journal · doi:10.47191/etj/v7i4.03 · Cited by 3
A Global to Local Guiding Network for Missing Data Imputation
Wang, W., Chai, Y., & Li, Y. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp43922.2022.9746136 · Cited by 3
Xiao, J., Liu, J., Li, D., et al. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-98358-1_43 · Cited by 3
Herath, H. M. K. K. M. B., Karunasena, G., & Madhusanka, B. G. D. A. (2022) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-90548-0.00013-9 · Cited by 3
Machine Learning Based Simulation for Design Space Exploration
Bleisinger, O., Malek, C., & Holbach, S. (2022) · Proceedings of the Design Society · doi:10.1017/pds.2022.154 · Cited by 3
Ngatini, N., Apriliani, E., & Nurhadi, H. (2022) · InPrime Indonesian Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics · doi:10.15408/inprime.v4i1.22912 · Cited by 3
LSTM Based Model For Apple Inc Stock Price Forecasting
Shi, H., Gao, Y., Lu, Z., et al. (2021) · International Conference on Computer Science and Management Technology (ICCSMT) · doi:10.1109/iccsmt54525.2021.00017 · Cited by 3
Tai, K. Y., Dhaliwal, J., & Wong, K. (2022) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-022-04870-0 · Cited by 3
Multitemporal impervious surface estimation via an optimized stable/change pixel detection approach
Fan, W., Chen, J., Li, X., et al. (2022) · GIScience & Remote Sensing · doi:10.1080/15481603.2022.2118430 · Cited by 3
Solar irradiance prediction based on self-attention recursive model network
Kang, T., Wang, H., Wu, T., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Energy Research · doi:10.3389/fenrg.2022.977979 · Cited by 3
Evaluation of the CMIP5 GCM rainfall simulation over the Shire River Basin in Malawi
Zuzani, P. N., Ngongondo, C., Mwale, F., et al. (2022) · Theoretical and Applied Climatology · doi:10.1007/s00704-022-04186-2 · Cited by 3
Diagnosis of respiratory diseases for children using machine learning
Saleh, M., & Çevik, M. (2022) · International Symposium on Multidisciplinary Studies and Innovative Technologies (ISMSIT) · doi:10.1109/ismsit56059.2022.9932662 · Cited by 3
Metric Effects Based on Fluctuations in Values of k in Nearest Neighbor Regressor
Gupta, A., Joshi, R. M., Kanvinde, N., et al. (2022) · Algorithms for intelligent systems · doi:10.1007/978-981-19-6004-8_12 · Cited by 3
Activated carbon paper as ethylene adsorber
Qanytah, Syamsu, K., Fahma, F., et al. (2022) · Nordic Pulp & Paper Research Journal · doi:10.1515/npprj-2022-0082 · Cited by 3
Metamodel-Based Simulation Optimization: A Systematic Literature Review
do Amaral, J. V. S., Montevechi, J. A. B., & Miranda, R. D. C. (2022) · Biblioteca Central da Universidade de Brasilia eBooks · doi:10.4322/978-65-86503-88-3.c05 · Cited by 3
Libel, T. (2022) · Data & Policy · doi:10.1017/dap.2022.26 · Cited by 3
Gao, X., Yang, P., Yu, M., et al. (2022) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109961 · Cited by 3
Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Techniques for Predicting Air Pollution
Akram, F. (2023) · Lahore Garrison University Research Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology · doi:10.54692/lgurjcsit.2022.0602270 · Cited by 3
Inverse Matrix Problem in Regression for High‐Dimensional Data Sets
Shakeel, N., & Mehmood, T. (2023) · Mathematical Problems in Engineering · doi:10.1155/2023/2308541 · Cited by 3
Within and among farm variability of coffee quality of smallholders in southwest Ethiopia
Getachew, M., Boeckx, P., Verheyen, K., et al. (2023) · Agroforestry Systems · doi:10.1007/s10457-023-00833-3 · Cited by 3
Fuzzy Windows with Gaussian Processed Labels for Ordinal Image Scoring Tasks
Kang, C., Yao, X., & Novák, D. (2023) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app13064019 · Cited by 3
Tan, Z., Wang, J., Yu, Z., et al. (2023) · Geographies · doi:10.3390/geographies3020013 · Cited by 3
Rahimi, M. M., Naghizade, E., Stevenson, M., & Winter, S. (2023) · Public Transport · doi:10.1007/s12469-022-00310-7 · Cited by 3
Chrobak, D., Kołodzieczak, M., Kozlovska, P., Krzemińska, A., & Miller, T. I. (2023) · InterConf · doi:10.51582/interconf.19-20.04.2023.040 · Cited by 4
Balsa, C., Breve, M. M., Rodrigues, C. V., et al. (2023) · Computation · doi:10.3390/computation11050098 · Cited by 3
Data-driven gait model for bipedal locomotion over continuous changing speeds and inclines
Singh, B., Patel, S., Vijayvargiya, A., et al. (2023) · Autonomous Robots · doi:10.1007/s10514-023-10108-6 · Cited by 3
GENÇ, İ. Y. (2023) · Journal of Aquatic Food Product Technology · doi:10.1080/10498850.2023.2219675 · Cited by 3
Liu, Y.-D., Li, W., Chen, J., et al. (2023) · Nuclear Science and Techniques · doi:10.1007/s41365-023-01247-7 · Cited by 3
Katipoğlu, O. M., & Sarıgöl, M. (2023) · Polish Journal of Environmental Studies · doi:10.15244/pjoes/161515 · Cited by 3
Aydın, Y., Bekdaş, G., Ni̇gdeli, S. M., Işıkdağ, Ü., & Geem, Z. W. (2023) · Studies in systems, decision and control · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-34728-3_12 · Cited by 3
González, Y., Sepúlveda, Á., & Yuri, J. A. (2023) · Chilean journal of agricultural research · doi:10.4067/s0718-58392023000300272 · Cited by 3
Research on Multi-objective Optimization Algorithm for Coal Blending
Li, X., Yu, R., Liu, G., et al. (2023) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-3925-1_3 · Cited by 3
New Modeling Approach for Predicting Disaggregated Time-Series Traffic Crashes
Cai, B., Quddus, M., Wang, X., et al. (2023) · Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board · doi:10.1177/03611981231182703 · Cited by 3
LRCMP: A Sequential Statistical Framework for Predicting Cancer Mortality Rate
Umar, M. A., Nawaz, A., & Qayyum, T. (2023) · International Multi-Topic ICT Conference (IMTIC) · doi:10.1109/imtic58887.2023.10178479 · Cited by 3
Purwanto, A., & Manik, L. P. (2022) · Scientific Journal of Informatics · doi:10.15294/sji.v10i1.39865 · Cited by 3
Research on Commodities Constraint Optimization Based on Graph Neural Network Prediction
Zhang, Y., Zhihan, Z., Li, H., et al. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3302923 · Cited by 3
Traffic Prediction Model Using Machine Learning in Intelligent Transportation Systems
Sharma, A., & Ranjan, P. (2023) · International Conference on Circuit, Power and Computing Technologies · doi:10.1109/iccpct58313.2023.10245139 · Cited by 3
Xu, M., Lam, C., Liang, Y., et al. (2023) · doi:10.1109/icsip57908.2023.10270968 · Cited by 3
Lazović, I., Đorđević, B., & Lukić, M. (2023) · International Review · doi:10.5937/intrev2302163l · Cited by 3
Algarni, M. A., & Ismail, M. M. B. (2023) · International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications · doi:10.14569/ijacsa.2023.01410123 · Cited by 3
Two-Stage Model-Based Predicting PV Generation with the Conjugation of IoT Sensor Data
Heo, Y., Kim, J., & Choi, S. G. (2023) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s23229178 · Cited by 3
CCR: Facial Image Editing with Continuity, Consistency and Reversibility
Yang, N., Luan, X., Jia, H., Han, Z. J., Li, X., & Tang, Y. (2023) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-023-01938-z · Cited by 3
Sadeghi, M., Mohammadinasab, E., & Isfahani, T. M. (2023) · Journal of Essential Oil Research · doi:10.1080/10412905.2023.2265376 · Cited by 3
The preliminary study of carbon x-change rakyat using blockchain application
Putro, W. S., Rahmi, N., Asditama, R. Y., & Akbar, N. A. (2023) · International Journal of Power Electronics and Drive Systems/International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering · doi:10.11591/ijece.v14i1.pp672-680 · Cited by 3
Enhanced transformer long short-term memory framework for datastream prediction
Dief, N. A., Salem, M. M., Rabie, A. H., et al. (2023) · International Journal of Power Electronics and Drive Systems/International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering · doi:10.11591/ijece.v14i1.pp830-840 · Cited by 3
Ensemble Soft Computing Models for Prediction of Deflection of Steel–Concrete Composite Bridges
Le, M. V., Nguyen, D. D., Ha, H., Prakash, I., & Pham, B. T. (2023) · Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering · doi:10.1007/s13369-023-08474-5 · Cited by 3
Session-Based Recommendation System Approach for Predicting Learning Performance
Giang, N. X. H., Toan, L. T., & Thai-Nghe, N. (2023) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-8296-7_22 · Cited by 3
Gleeson, K., Husband, S., Gaffney, J., & Boxall, J. B. (2023) · Journal of Hydroinformatics · doi:10.2166/hydro.2023.159 · Cited by 3
Zong, H., Brimblecombe, P., Gali, N. K., et al. (2023) · Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association · doi:10.1080/10962247.2023.2290710 · Cited by 3
Zhu, S., & Li, Y. (2023) · Applied Thermal Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.122246 · Cited by 3
Public debt forecasts and machine learning: the Italian case
Sica, E., Altınbaş, H., & Marini, G. G. (2023) · Journal of Economic Studies · doi:10.1108/jes-07-2023-0337 · Cited by 3
Ding, J., & Zuo, J. (2023) · Advances in Mechanical Engineering · doi:10.1177/16878132231215187 · Cited by 3
ANN BASED EARLY DETECTION OF ALZHEIMER DISEASE ON SELECTED FEATURES
Yıldız, S. G., & Yıldız, K. (2023) · Mühendislik Bilimleri ve Tasarım Dergisi · doi:10.21923/jesd.1296283 · Cited by 3
Feng, Y., Yan, B., Jeon, S., et al. (2024) · Wireless Networks · doi:10.1007/s11276-023-03611-2 · Cited by 3
Liu, Q., Zhao, X., Zou, J., et al. (2024) · Journal of Marine Science and Engineering · doi:10.3390/jmse12010141 · Cited by 3
Kim, S., Kim, S., Yuan, L., et al. (2024) · Radiation Oncology · doi:10.1186/s13014-023-02384-4 · Cited by 3
Tahsin, M. S., Karim, M. A., Ahmed, M. U., Tafannum, F., & Firoz, N. (2023) · Journal of Computer Science and Engineering (JCSE) · doi:10.36596/jcse.v4i2.708 · Cited by 3
Metode Simple Moving Average dan Weighted Moving Average Dalam Memprediksi Produksi Beras
Darwati, I., & Hayuningtyas, R. Y. (2023) · EVOLUSI - Jurnal Sains dan Manajemen · doi:10.31294/evolusi.v11i2.17267 · Cited by 3
Predicting construction equipment resale price: machine learning model
Toma, H. M., Abdeen, A. H., & Ibrahim, A. H. (2024) · Engineering Construction & Architectural Management · doi:10.1108/ecam-08-2023-0857 · Cited by 3
Reconstruction of Meteorological Records with PCA-Based Analog Ensemble Methods
Breve, M. M., Balsa, C., & Rufino, J. (2024) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-45642-8_8 · Cited by 3
Comparison Methods of Machine Learning and Deep Learning to Forecast The GDP of Indonesia
Subian, A. R., Mulkan, D. A., Ahmady, H. H., et al. (2024) · SISTEMASI · doi:10.32520/stmsi.v13i1.3445 · Cited by 3
Saqware, G. J., & Ismail, B. (2024) · Operations Research Forum · doi:10.1007/s43069-024-00302-2 · Cited by 3
Faster Image Deblurring for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
Sineglazov, V. M., Lesohorskyi, K., & Chumachenko, O. (2024) · International Conference on Unmanned Vehicle Systems-Oman (UVS) · doi:10.1109/uvs59630.2024.10467152 · Cited by 3
Marvel: Towards Efficient Federated Learning on IoT Devices
Liu, L., & Xu, X. (2024) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2024.110375 · Cited by 3
Gomes, E. P., Progênio, M. F., & Holanda, P. D. S. (2024) · Climate Dynamics · doi:10.1007/s00382-024-07200-7 · Cited by 3
Literature Review: Global Criticality Assessment Based on Feature Surrogates at the PCBA Levels
Yu, Q., Kamble, V. G., Gruber, D. P., Fuchs, P., Fendt, K., & Krivec, T. (2024) · International Conference on Thermal, Mechanical and Multi-Physics Simulation and Experiments in Microelectronics and Microsystems (EuroSimE) · doi:10.1109/eurosime60745.2024.10491544 · Cited by 3
A fuzzy model for generalized transportation problems in China
Al-Janabi, M., Borna, K., & Ghanbari, S. (2024) · Concurrency and Computation Practice and Experience · doi:10.1002/cpe.8126 · Cited by 3
Spatial Monitoring of Geological Carbon Storage Progress Using Time-Lapse Satellite Images
Li, Y., Dodds, N., Leezenberg, P. B., et al. (2024) · SPE Western Regional Meeting · doi:10.2118/218879-ms · Cited by 3
You, X., Yang, D., Qu, Y., Guo, M., Zhang, Y., Zhao, X., & Suo, Y. (2024) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods13091359 · Cited by 3
Kuma, H. G., Mekonnen, E., & Tolke, A. A. (2024) · Journal of Water and Climate Change · doi:10.2166/wcc.2024.656 · Cited by 3
Isaac, N., & Saha, A. K. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16104055 · Cited by 4
Lawal, A. I., Ogundipe, O., Kim, M., & Kwon, S. (2024) · Earth Science Informatics · doi:10.1007/s12145-024-01342-2 · Cited by 3
Gupta, D. K., Pramanick, S., & Singh, A. K. (2024) · Environmental Monitoring and Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10661-024-12862-1 · Cited by 3
Machine Learning Approach to Predict the Dengue Cases Based on Climate Factors
Nasir, M., Wulandhari, S. A., Tenrisau, D., Ibrahim, M. H., Rahastri, A., Rohmah, N. S., Surya, A., Thohir, B., Aryani, D., & Kasim, M. F. (2024) · Window of Health Jurnal Kesehatan · doi:10.33096/woh.vi.1428 · Cited by 3
Long-term wind power forecasting with series decomposition and spatio-temporal graph neural network
Yang, Y., Chen, J., Zheng, W., & Zhang, F. (2024) · International Journal of Green Energy · doi:10.1080/15435075.2024.2382351 · Cited by 3
Toward the Fractal Dimension of Classes
Pan, W., Wu, W. M., Ming, H., Kim, D., Yang, Z., & Ma, Y. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/3688844 · Cited by 3
Performance of Deep Feed-Forward Neural Network Algorithm Based on Content-Based Filtering Approach
Maulana, F., & Setiawan, E. B. (2024) · INTENSIF Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian dan Penerapan Teknologi Sistem Informasi · doi:10.29407/intensif.v8i2.22904 · Cited by 3
An IoT-Based Asthma Intensity Prediction Using Classification Models
Kumar, J. N. V. R. S., Nishant, B. N., Suraj, S., Rao, I. S. S., Pappu, S. R., & Lokesh, B. (2024) · International Conference on Sustainable Computing and Smart Systems (ICSCSS) · doi:10.1109/icscss60660.2024.10625043 · Cited by 4
Yun, S., Bhuiyan, M. Z. A., Shen, S., & Sadi, M. T. A. H. (2024) · International Conference on Communications · doi:10.1109/icc51166.2024.10622863 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Chai, T., & Draxler, R. R.
- Affiliations
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (US)
- Venue
- Geoscientific Model Development
- Publisher
- Copernicus GmbH
- Published
- 2014-06-30
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1247-1250
- ISSN
- 1991-959X (ISSN-L)
- 1991-9603
- OpenAlex
- W2102148524
- Semantic Scholar
- 8c42db1839098b46f18265907464c16e49bb7a1c
- Cited by
- 7,178
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1015 · 2025: 1120 · 2024: 980 · 2023: 873 · 2022: 751 · 2021: 683 · 2020: 538 · 2019: 411 · 2018: 324 · 2017: 235 · 2016: 175 · 2015: 59 · 2014: 13
- FWCI
- 106.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Geoscientific model development (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NA09NES4400006)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Forecasting Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- root mean square error, mean absolute error, model evaluation metrics, error distribution, Gaussian errors, triangle inequality, distance measures, model evaluation, hydrological model evaluation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-17, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-17 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
