The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 4 of the 8 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? – Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Abstract. Both the root mean square error (RMSE) and the mean absolute error (MAE) are regularly employed in model evaluation studies. Willmott and Matsuura (2005) have suggested that the RMSE is not a good indicator of average model performance and might be a misleading indicator of average error, and thus the MAE would be a better metric for that purpose. While some concerns over using RMSE raised by Willmott and Matsuura (2005) and Willmott et al. (2009) are valid, the proposed avoidance of RMSE in favor of MAE is not the solution. Citing the aforementioned papers, many researchers chose MAE over RMSE to present their model evaluation statistics when presenting or adding the RMSE measures could be more beneficial. In this technical note, we demonstrate that the RMSE is not ambiguous in its meaning, contrary to what was claimed by Willmott et al. (2009). The RMSE is more appropriate to represent model performance than the MAE when the error distribution is expected to be Gaussian. In addition, we show that the RMSE satisfies the triangle inequality requirement for a distance metric, whereas Willmott et al. (2009) indicated that the sums-of-squares-based statistics do not satisfy this rule. In the end, we discussed some circumstances where using the RMSE will be more beneficial. However, we do not contend that the RMSE is superior over the MAE. Instead, a combination of metrics, including but certainly not limited to RMSEs and MAEs, are often required to assess model performance.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This technical note argues against the recommendation by Willmott and Matsuura (2005) and Willmott et al. (2009) to abandon RMSE in favor of MAE, showing that RMSE is not ambiguous in meaning and is more appropriate when errors are expected to be Gaussian. The authors also demonstrate that RMSE satisfies the triangle inequality required of a distance metric, contrary to the earlier claims, while concluding that a combination of metrics is often needed.
Key findings
- RMSE is not ambiguous in its meaning, contrary to Willmott et al. (2009); it is more appropriate than MAE when the error distribution is expected to be Gaussian, whereas MAE suits uniformly distributed errors.
- Using randomly generated zero-mean, unit-variance Gaussian pseudo-errors, RMSEs converge to the true standard deviation (SE = 1) once n ≥ 100, with standard deviation within 5% of truth; MAEs converge to 0.8, approximating the expectation of √(2/π). Neither metric is robust at n = 4 or n = 10.
- RMSE satisfies the triangle inequality required for a distance metric: the example in Willmott et al. (2009) (d(a,c)=4, d(a,b)=2, d(b,c)=3) actually represents the MSE, not the RMSE, and the L2-norm proof in Eqs. (5)–(7) shows RMSE does satisfy it.
- RMSE has practical advantages: it avoids absolute values (useful for gradients/sensitivities and data assimilation cost functions) and is generally better at discriminating among model results by weighting unfavorable conditions more heavily.
Methods
- Technical note / commentary design: no new observational dataset; the argument is analytical, using norm theory (L1- and L2-norms linked to MAE and RMSE) and a proof of the triangle inequality for the L2-norm.
- A Monte Carlo-style demonstration: five sets of pseudo-errors of size n = 4, 10, 100, 1000, 10 000, and 1000 000 drawn from a zero-mean, unit-variance Gaussian distribution with different random seeds, comparing RMSEs and MAEs (Table 1).
- Reference to prior empirical example: Chai et al. (2009) reported RMSE-to-MAE ratios of 1.63 to 2.29 for model NO2 column predictions versus SCIAMACHY satellite observations.
Limitations
- Stated by the authors: the analysis assumes unbiased errors and does not consider uncertainties from observation errors or the method used to compare model and observations; all statistics are less useful with limited sample sizes (e.g., n = 4 or 10), where presenting the errors themselves may be more appropriate; for non-normal distributions, additional moments (mean, variance, skewness, flatness) are needed; outliers several orders larger than other samples may justifiably be removed when sample numbers are limited, and systematic errors may need removal before computing RMSEs.
- Evident from the text: the demonstration relies on synthetic Gaussian pseudo-errors rather than real model–observation comparisons, so the convergence results are conditional on the Gaussian assumption; the authors explicitly do not claim RMSE is superior to MAE, so the note offers guidance rather than a definitive metric selection rule.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
14 Own interpretation · 6 No basis given · 4 Supported · 3 Sources not found · 3 Own result · 1 No full text of the sources · 1 Not checked yet
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Using hypothetical sets of four errors, Willmott and Matsuura (2005) demonstrated that while keeping the MAE as a constant of 2.0, the RMSE varies from 2.0 to 4.0.”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 1 Introduction
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Willmott and Matsuura (2005) source
Table 1 identifies five hypothetical sets of four errors, and Section 3 says their RMSE increases as the error magnitudes become more variable. The paper gives the bounds as MAE ≤ RMSE ≤ √n × MAE; with four errors and an MAE of 2.0, those bounds are 2.0 and 4.0. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)
boostedstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, we show that the RMSE satisfies the triangle inequality requirement for a distance metric, whereas Willmott et al. (2009) indicated that the sums-ofsquares-based statistics do not satisfy this rule.”
- Also stated in: § 3 Triangle inequality of a metric · boosted
“This proves that RMSE satisfies the triangle inequality required for a distance function metric.”
- Also stated in: § 4 Summary and discussion · boosted
“In addition, we demonstrate that the RMSE satisfies the triangle inequality required for a distance function metric.”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > Abstract
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 3 Triangle inequality of a metric · boosted
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“When the sample size reaches 100 or above, using the calculated RMSEs one can re-construct the error distribution close to its “truth” or “exact solution”, with its standard deviation within 5 % to its truth (i.e., SE = 1).”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 2 Interpretation of RMSE and MAE
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The errors are unbiased and follow a normal distribution when presenting the RMSE.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The uncertainties brought in by observation errors or the method used to compare model and observations are not considered.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For instance, Table 1 shows that neither the RMSEs nor the MAEs are robust when only 4 or 10 samples are used to calculate those values.”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 2 Interpretation of RMSE and MAE
plainn = 10- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The errors are unbiased and follow a normal distribution when presenting the RMSE.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The uncertainties brought in by observation errors or the method used to compare model and observations are not considered.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The RMSE is more appropriate to represent model performance than the MAE when the error distribution is expected to be Gaussian.”
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · plain
“When the error distribution is expected to be Gaussian and there are enough samples, the RMSE has an advantage over the MAE to illustrate the error distribution.”
- Also stated in: § 4 Summary and discussion · plain
“We present that the RMSE is not ambiguous in its meaning, and it is more appropriate to use than the MAE when model errors follow a normal distribution.”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Model errors are likely to have a normal distribution rather than a uniform distribution.
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · plain
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Giving higher weighting to the unfavorable conditions, the RMSE usually is better at revealing model performance differences.”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 4 Summary and discussion
hedgedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The L1-norm and L2-norm are closely related to the MAE and the RMSE, respectively, as shown in Eqs. ( 3) and ( 4): Horn and Johnson, 1990).”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 3 Triangle inequality of a metric
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Horn and Johnson, 1990
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
In the paper
“In this technical note, we demonstrate that the RMSE is not ambiguous in its meaning, contrary to what was claimed by Willmott et al. (2009).”
- Also stated in: § 4 Summary and discussion · plain
“We present that the RMSE is not ambiguous in its meaning, and it is more appropriate to use than the MAE when model errors follow a normal distribution.”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Willmott et al. (2009)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 4 Summary and discussion · plain
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“One distinct advantage of RMSEs over MAEs is that RM-SEs avoid the use of absolute value, which is highly undesirable in many mathematical calculations.”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 4 Summary and discussion
boostedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Similarly, one can readily show that, for several sets of errors with the same RMSE, the MAE would vary from set to set.”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 1 Introduction
hedgedstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 10
- It may state two separate claims as one. 2
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“They summarized that the RMSE tends to become increasingly larger than the MAE (but not necessarily in a monotonic fashion) as the distribution of error magnitudes becomes more variable.”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 1 Introduction
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Willmott and Matsuura (2005) source
The Concluding Remarks state the attributed point directly, including the qualification that the increase need not be monotonic. (LLM, conf=0.95)
hedgedstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“They concluded that the RMSE varies with the variability of the the error magnitudes and the total-error or averageerror magnitude (MAE), and the sample size n.”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 1 Introduction
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Willmott and Matsuura (2005) source
The Concluding Remarks state that RMSE depends on error-magnitude variability, MAE, and the square root of sample size. The claim says it varies with sample size n, which accurately conveys that dependence without asserting that the relationship is linear. (LLM, conf=0.93)
boostedstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Willmott and Matsuura (2005) have simply proved that the RMSE is not equivalent to the MAE, and one cannot easily derive the MAE value from the RMSE (and vice versa).”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 1 Introduction
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Willmott and Matsuura (2005) source
Section 3 describes an inconsistent relationship between MAE and RMSE, including cases where RMSE changes with error-magnitude variance. Section 4 explains that RMSE depends on MAE, the distribution of error magnitudes, and the number of errors. This supports the claim that the measures are not equivalent and that one cannot generally derive either value from the other alone. (LLM, conf=0.90)
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Table 1 shows that the MAEs converge to 0.8, an approximation to the expectation of 2 π .”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 2 Interpretation of RMSE and MAE
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The errors are unbiased and follow a normal distribution when presenting the RMSE.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The uncertainties brought in by observation errors or the method used to compare model and observations are not considered.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“When both metrics are calculated, the RMSE is by definition never smaller than the MAE.”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 1 Introduction
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The MAE is suitable to describe uniformly distributed errors.”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 2 Interpretation of RMSE and MAE
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For other kinds of distributions, more statistical moments of model errors, such as mean, variance, skewness, and flatness, are needed to provide a complete picture of the model error variation.”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 4 Summary and discussion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The ratio of RMSE to MAE ranged from 1.63 to 2.29 (see Table 1 of Chai et al., 2009).”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 1 Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Chai et al., 2009 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In many of the model sensitivity studies that use only RMSE, a detailed interpretation is not critical because variations of the same model will have similar error distributions.”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 4 Summary and discussion
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As every statistical measure condenses a large number of data into a single value, it only provides one projection of the model errors emphasizing a certain aspect of the error characteristics of the model performance.”
- Also stated in: § 4 Summary and discussion · plain
“As stated earlier, any single metric provides only one projection of the model errors and, therefore, only emphasizes a certain aspect of the error characteristics.”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 1 Introduction
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Also stated in: § 4 Summary and discussion · plain
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A combination of metrics, including but certainly not limited to RMSEs and MAEs, are often required to assess model performance.”
- Also stated in: § 4 Summary and discussion · plain
“A combination of metrics, including but certainly not limited to RMSEs and MAEs, are often required to assess model performance.”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Also stated in: § 4 Summary and discussion · plain
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While the MAE gives the same weight to all errors, the RMSE penalizes variance as it gives errors with larger absolute values more weight than errors with smaller absolute values.”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 1 Introduction
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The authors state this as an assumption.
The errors are unbiased and follow a normal distribution when presenting the RMSE.
“The underlying assumption when presenting the RMSE is that the errors are unbiased and follow a normal distribution.”
“We also assume the error sample set is unbiased.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Model errors are likely to have a normal distribution rather than a uniform distribution.
“Because model errors are likely to have a normal distribution rather than a uniform distribution, the RMSE is a better metric to present than the MAE for such a type of data.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The uncertainties brought in by observation errors or the method used to compare model and observations are not considered.
“The uncertainties brought in by observation errors or the method used to compare model and observations are not considered here.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There are often hundreds of observations available to calculate model statistics.
“Fortunately, there are often hundreds of observations available to calculate model statistics, unlike the examples with n = 4 (Willmott and Matsuura, 2005) and n = 10 ( Willmott et al., 2009).”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 4 Summary and discussion
“| 4 | 0.92, 0.65, 1.48, 1.02, 0.79 0.70, 0.57, 1.33, 1.16, 0.76 | |”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 1 Introduction
“When both metrics are calculated, the RMSE is by definition never smaller than the MAE.”
Citations
Cites
Horn, R. A., & Johnson, C. R. (1985) · Cited by 22,203
David, F. N., & Tukey, J. W. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529486 · Cited by 12,707
Willmott, C., & Matsuura, K. (2005) · Climate Research · doi:10.3354/cr030079 · Cited by 6,512 · cited 4×
“Further, Willmott et al. (2009) concluded that the sums-of-squaresbased error statistics such as the RMSE and the standard error have inherent ambiguities and recommended the use of alternates such as the MAE.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialHuber, P. J., & Ronchetti, E. M. (2009) · Wiley series in probability and statistics · doi:10.1002/9780470434697 · Cited by 1,823
Ambiguities inherent in sums-of-squares-based error statistics
Willmott, C. J., Matsuura, K., & Robeson, S. M. (2008) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.10.005 · Cited by 212 · cited 1×
“Fortunately, there are often hundreds of observations available to calculate model statistics, unlike the examples with n= 4 (Willmott and Matsuura, 2005) and n= 10 (Willmott et al., 2009).”
BackgroundMcKeen, S. A., Wilczak, J. M., Grell, G., et al. (2005) · Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2005jd005858 · Cited by 208
Savage, N., Agnew, P., Davis, L. S., Ordóñez, C., Thorpe, R., Johnson, C. E., O’Connor, F. M., & Dalvi, M. (2013) · Geoscientific model development · doi:10.5194/gmd-6-353-2013 · Cited by 128
Taylor, M. H., Lösch, M., Wenzel, M., et al. (2013) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/jcli-d-13-00089.1 · Cited by 93
Chai, T., Kim, H. C., Lee, P., et al. (2013) · Geoscientific model development · doi:10.5194/gmd-6-1831-2013 · Cited by 87
Self-citationA multi-physics ensemble of present-day climate regional simulations over the Iberian Peninsula
Jerez, S., Montávez, J. P., Jiménez‐Guerrero, P., et al. (2012) · Climate Dynamics · doi:10.1007/s00382-012-1539-1 · Cited by 80 · cited 2×
“(2009) (e.g., Taylor et al., 2013; Chatterjee et al., 2013; Jerez et al., 2013).”
Method
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 4,101–4,200 of 7,174
Accurate and efficient stock market index prediction: an integrated approach based on VMD-SNNs
Chen, X., Tang, G., Ren, Y., Lin, X., & Li, T. (2024) · Journal of Applied Statistics · doi:10.1080/02664763.2024.2395961 · Cited by 3
How online exposure to nature affects customer engagement: Evidence from Sina Weibo
Wang, J., Zou, P., & Yu, B. (2024) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-024-00728-w · Cited by 4
Guo, Y., Yuan, B., Shao, C., Niu, G., 许冬梅, & Gao, Y. (2024) · Atmosphere · doi:10.3390/atmos15091107 · Cited by 3
Predicting Solar Photovoltaic Power Production Using Artificial Intelligence-Based Algorithms
ElMoaqet, H., Karasneh, D., Al‐Dahidi, S., et al. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1109/is61756.2024.10705265 · Cited by 3
A comparative analysis of machine learning methods for display characterization
Almutairi, K., Morillas, S., Carmona, P., Dansoko, M., & Gacto, M. J. (2024) · Displays · doi:10.1016/j.displa.2024.102849 · Cited by 4
张, 昊., 李, 明., & Hu, Y. (2024) · SCIENTIA SINICA Terrae · doi:10.1360/sste-2024-0090 · Cited by 3
Veihelmann, T., Reitz, P., Lübke, M., et al. (2024) · Solar RRL · doi:10.1002/solr.202400470 · Cited by 3
Mishan, M. T., Amir, A. L., & Salleh, N. M. (2024) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Data Sciences (AiDAS) · doi:10.1109/aidas63860.2024.10730333 · Cited by 3
CNN Modeling for Recognizing Rice Leaf Diseases
Ghosh, U., Rokoni, S., Rahman, M. A., et al. (2024) · International Conference on Computing, Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT) · doi:10.1109/icccnt61001.2024.10725764 · Cited by 3
Guorong, 朱. Z., Chuandong, 谭. T., Yarui, 席. X., et al. (2024) · ACTA PHOTONICA SINICA · doi:10.3788/gzxb20245309.0910001 · Cited by 3
Vonzun, S., Schneider, M. C., Gfeller, V., et al. (2024) · Legume Science · doi:10.1002/leg3.70014 · Cited by 3
Liu, C.-Y., & Arora, A. (2024) · Environment Development and Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s10668-024-05859-w · Cited by 3
Predicting and optimizing the mechanical properties of rejuvenated asphalt mix with RAP content
Islam, M. K., Gazder, U., Mamun, A. A., et al. (2024) · Neural Computing and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00521-024-10553-z · Cited by 3
Park, J. H., Hwang, D., Kang, M., et al. (2024) · LWT · doi:10.1016/j.lwt.2024.117271 · Cited by 3
Arzola-Flores, J. A., Alvarado-García, J. A., García‐Castro, M. A., Díaz-Sánchez, F., Limón-Aguilar, X., & Saviñón-Flores, M. F. (2025) · Thermochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.tca.2024.179923 · Cited by 3
Ennejjar, M., Assri, N. E., Ezzini, M., et al. (2024) · International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Applications (DASA) · doi:10.1109/dasa63652.2024.10836509 · Cited by 3
Li, R., Feng, Q., & Cui, Y. (2025) · Hydrological Sciences Journal · doi:10.1080/02626667.2025.2456211 · Cited by 3
In-line detection of pouch foil damage in batteries during manufacturing using lamb waves
Swaschnig, P., Kofler, J., Klambauer, R., & Bergmann, A. (2025) · NDT & E International · doi:10.1016/j.ndteint.2025.103322 · Cited by 3
Karalasingham, S., Deo, R. C., Raj, N., et al. (2025) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs17030461 · Cited by 3
Rainfall Prediction in Palembang City Using the GRU and LSTM Methods
Wijaya, S., Kurniawan, T. B., Negara, E. S., et al. (2023) · INTI JOURNAL. · doi:10.61453/jods.v2023no04 · Cited by 3
Raj, S., Saha, S., Singh, B., & Pedanekar, N. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2025.3539884 · Cited by 4
No-Reference Quality Assessment of Infrared Image Colorization with Color–Spatial Features
Sheng, D., Jin, W., Wang, X., & Li, L. (2025) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics14061126 · Cited by 3
Paiva, M. D. S., Mocellin, A. P. G., Oleinik, P. H., et al. (2025) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr13051395 · Cited by 3
Li, N., Qiao, J., Gao, F., Wang, Y., Shi, H. W., Zhang, Z., Cui, F., Zhang, L., & Wei, L. (2025) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.5c00895 · Cited by 4
Haokun, Z., Guan, Q., Alsereidi, R. A. A. A., et al. (2025) · Applied Thermal Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2025.127140 · Cited by 3
Eslami, Z., Shirvani, A., & Granata, F. (2025) · Meteorological Applications · doi:10.1002/met.70082 · Cited by 3
R2RNet: A deep spatiotemporal RaintoRiverNetwork for water level prediction and flood forecasting
Dhankhar, S., Wittek, S., Eivazi, H., & Rausch, A. (2025) · Journal of Hydrology Regional Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ejrh.2025.102571 · Cited by 3
In-DMU: Modeling Uncertainty in Interferometric SAR-Based Deformation Monitoring
Wang, T., Wang, Y., Zhao, F., et al. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2025.3595272 · Cited by 3
A Machine Learning-Based Modeling Approach for Dye Removal Using Modified Natural Adsorbents
Uzbaş, B., & Kocaman, S. (2025) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.5c01016 · Cited by 3
Rybak, A., Rybak, A., & Kolev, S. D. (2025) · Energy Reports · doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2025.08.029 · Cited by 4
S&P500 volatility analysis using high-frequency multipower variation volatility proxies
Chin, W. C., & Lee, M. C. (2017) · Empirical Economics · doi:10.1007/s00181-017-1345-z · Cited by 3
Gossman, K. A., & Hayes, M. G. (2018) · South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences · doi:10.4102/sajems.v21i1.1638 · Cited by 3
Desain Kontroler Proporsional Modifikasi pada Motor Servo
Hadi, A. (2019) · PROtek Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Elektro · doi:10.33387/protk.v6i2.1212 · Cited by 3
Time Series from Clustering: An Approach to Forecast Crime Patterns
Melgarejo, M., Rodríguez, C., Mayorga, D., & Obregón, N. (2019) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.89561 · Cited by 4
Multi-Source Deep Residual Fusion Network for Depth Image Super-resolution
Hao, X., Lü, T., Zhang, Y., et al. (2019) · doi:10.1145/3366715.3366731 · Cited by 3
Jaikhang, W., & Tunyasrirut, S. (2019) · Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Informatics (IJEEI) · doi:10.11591/ijeei.v7i4.1329 · Cited by 3
Rizzo, G. L. C., Marco, M. D., Rosa, P. D., & Laura, L. (2020) · Lecture notes in business information processing · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-38724-2_5 · Cited by 3
Fikri, M., Atmadipoera, A. S., & Nurjaya, I. W. (2020) · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science · doi:10.1088/1755-1315/429/1/012022 · Cited by 3
An adaptive model for the location of low-frequency sound sources in shallow sea environments
Sun, X., Jia, X., Zheng, Y., & Wang, Z. (2020) · Applied Acoustics · doi:10.1016/j.apacoust.2020.107569 · Cited by 3
Analisis Regresi untuk Memprediksi Tahanan Kapal Cepat
Alvin, M. H., Atok, R. M., & Indiaryanto, M. (2020) · Jurnal Sains dan Seni ITS · doi:10.12962/j23373520.v9i1.51386 · Cited by 3
Flow parameter estimation using laser absorption spectroscopy and approximate Bayesian computation
Christopher, J., Doronina, O. A., Petrykowski, D., Hayden, T. R. S., Lapointe, C. B., Wimer, N. T., Grooms, I. G., Rieker, G. B., & Hamlington, P. E. (2021) · Experiments in Fluids · doi:10.1007/s00348-020-03122-2 · Cited by 3
A Comparative Study of Learning Algorithms on a Call Flow Entering of a Call Center
Aattouri, I., Rida, M., & Mouncif, H. (2021) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-73103-8_36 · Cited by 3
Rajagopal, H., Mokhtar, N. B., Khairuddin, A. S. M., et al. (2021) · Proceedings of International Conference on Artificial Life and Robotics · doi:10.5954/icarob.2021.os1-1 · Cited by 3
Kumari, K., & Goswami, M. (2021) · Journal of Signal Processing Systems · doi:10.1007/s11265-021-01685-9 · Cited by 3
Madjid, H. A., Ambarwati, A., & Latipah, L. (2021) · Jurnal Sistem dan Teknologi Informasi (JustIN) · doi:10.26418/justin.v9i3.45796 · Cited by 3
Predicting credit card fraud using multipurpose classification based on evolutionary rules
Di̇ri̇k, M. (2022) · Security and Privacy · doi:10.1002/spy2.239 · Cited by 3
Allias, N., Noor, M. N. M. M., Ismail, M. T., et al. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Automatic Control and Intelligent Systems (I2CACIS) · doi:10.1109/i2cacis54679.2022.9815466 · Cited by 3
PM2.5 Spatial-Temporal Long Series Forecasting Based on Deep Learning and EMD
Zhang, Q., Yang, G., & Yuan, E. (2022) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-981-19-3610-4_1 · Cited by 4
Closed-Form Models of Accuracy Loss due to Subsampling in SVD Collaborative Filtering
Poudel, S., & Bikdash, M. U. (2022) · Big Data Mining and Analytics · doi:10.26599/bdma.2022.9020024 · Cited by 3
Siebald, H., Pforte, F., Kulig, B., et al. (2023) · Biosystems Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2022.12.007 · Cited by 3
Autonomous Quadrotor Flight Stabilisation Based on a Complementary Filter and a PID Controller
Derkach, M., Skarga-Bandurova, I., Matiuk, D., et al. (2022) · International Conference on Dependable Systems, Services and Technologies (DESSERT) · doi:10.1109/dessert58054.2022.10018623 · Cited by 3
Manifold and transfer subspace learning for cross-domain vehicle recognition in dynamic systems
Mendoza-Schrock, O. L., Rizki, M. M., & Velten, V. J. (2015) · Cited by 3
Wikarsa, L., Paseru, D., & Pangemanan, V. T. (2015) · doi:10.1109/iceei.2015.7352570 · Cited by 3
Comparing the Performance of Different Data Mining Techniques in Evaluating Loan Applications
Riasi, A., & Wang, D. (2016) · International Business Research · doi:10.5539/ibr.v9n7p164 · Cited by 3
ESTIMATION OF PHOSPHORUS EMISSIONS IN THE UPPER IGUAZU BASIN (BRAZIL) USING GIS AND THE MORE MODEL
Acosta, E., Kishi, R. T., Fuchs, S., et al. (2016) · The international archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences/International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences · doi:10.5194/isprs-archives-xli-b8-299-2016 · Cited by 3
Forecasting Patient Outflow from Wards having No Real-Time Clinical Data
Gopakumar, S., Tran, T., Luo, W., et al. (2016) · IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI) · doi:10.1109/ichi.2016.26 · Cited by 3
Improved personalized recommendation system with better user experience
Ghanwat, P., & Chacko, A. M. (2017) · International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI) · doi:10.1109/icacci.2017.8126008 · Cited by 3
Application of blind deconvolution and Lucy-Richardson Deconvolution for image deblurring
Abang, M. Z., Ramli, M. S., & Halim, S. A. (2018) · Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences · doi:10.4314/jfas.v9i5s.17 · Cited by 3
Author profiling using a graph enrichment approach
Castillo, E., Cervantes, O., & Vilariño, D. (2018) · Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.3233/jifs-169485 · Cited by 3
Which Friction Factor Model Is the Best? A Comparative Analysis of Model Selection Criteria
Kamel, A. H., Shaqlaih, A. S., & Rozyyev, A. (2018) · Journal of Energy and Power Engineering · doi:10.17265/1934-8975/2018.03.006 · Cited by 3
Mitigation of multipath fading in indoor radiometric fingerprinting systems
Agel, M. M., Habaebi, M. H., & Islam, M. R. (2018) · Computers & Electrical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compeleceng.2018.11.002 · Cited by 3
Forecasting annual energy consumption using machine learnings: Case of Indonesia
Kurniawan, R., & Managi, S. (2019) · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science · doi:10.1088/1755-1315/257/1/012032 · Cited by 3
PREDIKSI PENJUALAN OBAT HERBAL HP PRO MENGGUNAKAN ALGORITMA NEURAL NETWORK
Wibowo, D. A. (2018) · Technologia Jurnal Ilmiah · doi:10.31602/tji.v9i1.1100 · Cited by 3
The Pearson Type IV distribution function employed to describe the parametric flow hydrograph
Baziak, B., & Gądek, W. (2019) · Acta Geophysica · doi:10.1007/s11600-019-00327-w · Cited by 3
A Data-Based Approach for Sensor Fault Detection and Diagnosis of Electro-Pneumatic Brake
Lu, Y., Fan, X., Gao, D., et al. (2019) · IEEE Conference on Prognostics and Health Management · doi:10.1109/icphm.2019.8819443 · Cited by 3
Rivera, M. M., Padilla, A., Gallegos, J. C. P., et al. (2019) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-33749-0_45 · Cited by 3
IMPACT OF INTEGRAL DIMENSIONS ON HALTON AND SOBOL SEQUENCES PERFORMANCE
MOHAMMED, N., & ABDULLAH, S. (2019) · The Journal of The University of Duhok · doi:10.26682/sjuod.2019.22.1.3 · Cited by 3
Predictive Control for Distributed Smart Street Light Network
Lee, P. Z., Ping, S., & Eng, C. (2019) · International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications · doi:10.14569/ijacsa.2019.0101244 · Cited by 3
Hanggoro, W., Yuanshu, J., Cudemus, L., & Zhihao, J. (2020) · Water · doi:10.3390/w12020381 · Cited by 4
Android App Success Prediction based on Reviews
Suresh, K. P., & Urolagin, S. (2020) · International Conference on Computation, Automation and Knowledge Management (ICCAKM) · doi:10.1109/iccakm46823.2020.9051529 · Cited by 3
A Rapid Scalable Embedding and Mapping Model for Recommendation
Zhang, S., Yang, C. Z., & Luo, W. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3000894 · Cited by 3
Genetic Algorithm Optimization of Lift Distribution in Subsonic Low-Range Designs
Ferrero-Guillén, R., Álvarez, R., Díez-González, J., et al. (2020) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-57802-2_50 · Cited by 3
Dolinina, E. S., & Parfenyuk, E. V. (2021) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma14040963 · Cited by 3
Saikhu, A., Hudiyanti, C. V., Buliali, J. L., et al. (2021) · IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering · doi:10.1088/1757-899x/1077/1/012055 · Cited by 3
Automated User Experience Testing through Multi-Dimensional Performance Impact Analysis
Biringa, C. U., & Kul, G. (2021) · doi:10.1109/ast52587.2021.00024 · Cited by 3
Genetic Algorithmised Neuro Fuzzy System for Forecasting the Online Journal Visitors
Mahmudy, W. F., Wibawa, A. P., Sari, N. R., et al. (2021) · International Journal of Computing · doi:10.47839/ijc.20.2.2165 · Cited by 3
Severity Estimation of Depression Using Convolutional Neural Network
Jenei, A. Z., & Kiss, G. J. (2021) · Periodica Polytechnica Electrical Engineering and Computer Science · doi:10.3311/ppee.15958 · Cited by 3
Spatiotemporal Traffic Prediction Using Hierarchical Bayesian Modeling
Alghamdi, T., Elgazzar, K., & Sharaf, T. (2021) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi13090225 · Cited by 3
Nonlinear modeling of industrial boiler NOx emissions
Ronquillo-Lomelí, G., Rodríguez-Olivares, N. A., Barriga‐Rodríguez, L., et al. (2021) · Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association · doi:10.1080/10962247.2021.1980451 · Cited by 3
Aken, I. A., Okanga-Guay, M., Assoumou, E. O., et al. (2021) · European Scientific Journal ESJ · doi:10.19044/esj.2021.v17n34p172 · Cited by 3
Tran, V. Q. (2021) · Lecture notes in civil engineering · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-7160-9_197 · Cited by 3
SAYDAM, D. B., Çerçi, K. N., & Hürdoğan, E. (2021) · Mühendislik Bilimleri ve Tasarım Dergisi · doi:10.21923/jesd.935201 · Cited by 3
IoT and Reality Mining for Real-Time Disease Prediction
Asri, H. (2022) · EAI/Springer Innovations in Communication and Computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-90083-0_7 · Cited by 3
Estimation of the Torques Produced by Human Upper Limb during Eating Activities Using NARX-NN
Hussain, Z., & Azlan, N. Z. (2022) · Applied Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1080/08839514.2022.2033472 · Cited by 3
Villalobos, H. L. R., Samani, Z., Brown, C. P., et al. (2022) · Tecnología y Ciencias del Agua · doi:10.24850/j-tyca-13-06-05 · Cited by 3
DINI: data imputation using neural inversion for edge applications
Tuli, S., & Jha, N. K. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-24369-1 · Cited by 3
Pahuriray, A. V., Basanta, J. D., Arroyo, J. C. T., et al. (2022) · International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering · doi:10.46338/ijetae1222_01 · Cited by 3
Multi-Relational Cognitive Diagnosis for Intelligent Education
Wu, K., Yang, Y., Zhang, K., et al. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-20500-2_35 · Cited by 3
Minimization of electricity demand and cost for multi-zone buildings: Part I—Modeling and validation
Ogunsola, O. T., Song, L., & Tang, C. Y. (2017) · Science and Technology for the Built Environment · doi:10.1080/23744731.2017.1327276 · Cited by 3
Accelerated stability transformation method for chaos control of discrete dynamical systems
Yang, D., Li, X., Chen, G., et al. (2018) · Nonlinear Dynamics · doi:10.1007/s11071-018-4418-4 · Cited by 3
Predicting Learning Achievement Using Big Data Cluster Analysis : Focusing on Longitudinal Study
Ko, S.-J. (2018) · Journal of Digital Contents Society · doi:10.9728/dcs.2018.19.9.1769 · Cited by 3
Accelerated method for the optimization of quadratic image filter
Uzun, S., & Akgün, D. (2019) · Journal of Electronic Imaging · doi:10.1117/1.jei.28.3.033036 · Cited by 3
Monte Carlo Simulations as a Decision Support to Interpret δ 15 N Values of Nitrate in Groundwater
Wild, L. M., Rein, A., & Einsiedl, F. (2019) · Ground Water · doi:10.1111/gwat.12936 · Cited by 3
Prediction of School Efficiency Rates through Ensemble Regression Application
do Nascimento, R. L. S., Fagundes, R. A. A., & Maciel, A. M. A. (2019) · IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) · doi:10.1109/icalt.2019.00050 · Cited by 3
Predictive Demand Analytics for Inventory Control in Refined Sugar Supply Chain Downstream
Ekawati, R., Kurnia, E., Wardah, S., & Djatna, T. (2019) · International Seminar on Application for Technology of Information and Communication (iSemantic) · doi:10.1109/isemantic.2019.8884293 · Cited by 3
Bai, R., Wang, W., Yu, Q., Zhang, Q., Kong, X., Sun, Y., Zhuang, X., Wang, Z., & Yuan, Z. (2020) · Waste and Biomass Valorization · doi:10.1007/s12649-019-00932-2 · Cited by 3
Business Matching for Event Management and Marketing in Mass Based on Predictive Algorithms
Sabbani, A., & Haddadi, A. E. (2019) · International Conference on Signal-Image Technology & Internet-Based Systems (SITIS) · doi:10.1109/sitis.2019.00102 · Cited by 3
Optimal frequency combination estimation for accurate ultrasound non‐destructive testing
Kumar, A., Shakya, S., & Goswami, M. (2020) · Electronics Letters · doi:10.1049/el.2020.1611 · Cited by 3
Zamzami, N., Koochemeshkian, P., & Bouguila, N. (2020) · IEEE International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration for Data Science (IRI) · doi:10.1109/iri49571.2020.00023 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Chai, T., & Draxler, R. R.
- Affiliations
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (US)
- Venue
- Geoscientific Model Development
- Publisher
- Copernicus GmbH
- Published
- 2014-06-30
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1247-1250
- ISSN
- 1991-959X (ISSN-L)
- 1991-9603
- OpenAlex
- W2102148524
- Semantic Scholar
- 8c42db1839098b46f18265907464c16e49bb7a1c
- Cited by
- 7,178
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1015 · 2025: 1120 · 2024: 980 · 2023: 873 · 2022: 751 · 2021: 683 · 2020: 538 · 2019: 411 · 2018: 324 · 2017: 235 · 2016: 175 · 2015: 59 · 2014: 13
- FWCI
- 106.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Geoscientific model development (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NA09NES4400006)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Forecasting Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- root mean square error, mean absolute error, model evaluation metrics, error distribution, Gaussian errors, triangle inequality, distance measures, model evaluation, hydrological model evaluation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-17, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-17 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
