The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 4 of the 8 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? – Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Abstract. Both the root mean square error (RMSE) and the mean absolute error (MAE) are regularly employed in model evaluation studies. Willmott and Matsuura (2005) have suggested that the RMSE is not a good indicator of average model performance and might be a misleading indicator of average error, and thus the MAE would be a better metric for that purpose. While some concerns over using RMSE raised by Willmott and Matsuura (2005) and Willmott et al. (2009) are valid, the proposed avoidance of RMSE in favor of MAE is not the solution. Citing the aforementioned papers, many researchers chose MAE over RMSE to present their model evaluation statistics when presenting or adding the RMSE measures could be more beneficial. In this technical note, we demonstrate that the RMSE is not ambiguous in its meaning, contrary to what was claimed by Willmott et al. (2009). The RMSE is more appropriate to represent model performance than the MAE when the error distribution is expected to be Gaussian. In addition, we show that the RMSE satisfies the triangle inequality requirement for a distance metric, whereas Willmott et al. (2009) indicated that the sums-of-squares-based statistics do not satisfy this rule. In the end, we discussed some circumstances where using the RMSE will be more beneficial. However, we do not contend that the RMSE is superior over the MAE. Instead, a combination of metrics, including but certainly not limited to RMSEs and MAEs, are often required to assess model performance.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This technical note argues against the recommendation by Willmott and Matsuura (2005) and Willmott et al. (2009) to abandon RMSE in favor of MAE, showing that RMSE is not ambiguous in meaning and is more appropriate when errors are expected to be Gaussian. The authors also demonstrate that RMSE satisfies the triangle inequality required of a distance metric, contrary to the earlier claims, while concluding that a combination of metrics is often needed.
Key findings
- RMSE is not ambiguous in its meaning, contrary to Willmott et al. (2009); it is more appropriate than MAE when the error distribution is expected to be Gaussian, whereas MAE suits uniformly distributed errors.
- Using randomly generated zero-mean, unit-variance Gaussian pseudo-errors, RMSEs converge to the true standard deviation (SE = 1) once n ≥ 100, with standard deviation within 5% of truth; MAEs converge to 0.8, approximating the expectation of √(2/π). Neither metric is robust at n = 4 or n = 10.
- RMSE satisfies the triangle inequality required for a distance metric: the example in Willmott et al. (2009) (d(a,c)=4, d(a,b)=2, d(b,c)=3) actually represents the MSE, not the RMSE, and the L2-norm proof in Eqs. (5)–(7) shows RMSE does satisfy it.
- RMSE has practical advantages: it avoids absolute values (useful for gradients/sensitivities and data assimilation cost functions) and is generally better at discriminating among model results by weighting unfavorable conditions more heavily.
Methods
- Technical note / commentary design: no new observational dataset; the argument is analytical, using norm theory (L1- and L2-norms linked to MAE and RMSE) and a proof of the triangle inequality for the L2-norm.
- A Monte Carlo-style demonstration: five sets of pseudo-errors of size n = 4, 10, 100, 1000, 10 000, and 1000 000 drawn from a zero-mean, unit-variance Gaussian distribution with different random seeds, comparing RMSEs and MAEs (Table 1).
- Reference to prior empirical example: Chai et al. (2009) reported RMSE-to-MAE ratios of 1.63 to 2.29 for model NO2 column predictions versus SCIAMACHY satellite observations.
Limitations
- Stated by the authors: the analysis assumes unbiased errors and does not consider uncertainties from observation errors or the method used to compare model and observations; all statistics are less useful with limited sample sizes (e.g., n = 4 or 10), where presenting the errors themselves may be more appropriate; for non-normal distributions, additional moments (mean, variance, skewness, flatness) are needed; outliers several orders larger than other samples may justifiably be removed when sample numbers are limited, and systematic errors may need removal before computing RMSEs.
- Evident from the text: the demonstration relies on synthetic Gaussian pseudo-errors rather than real model–observation comparisons, so the convergence results are conditional on the Gaussian assumption; the authors explicitly do not claim RMSE is superior to MAE, so the note offers guidance rather than a definitive metric selection rule.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
14 Own interpretation · 6 No basis given · 4 Supported · 3 Sources not found · 3 Own result · 1 No full text of the sources · 1 Not checked yet
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Using hypothetical sets of four errors, Willmott and Matsuura (2005) demonstrated that while keeping the MAE as a constant of 2.0, the RMSE varies from 2.0 to 4.0.”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 1 Introduction
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Willmott and Matsuura (2005) source
Table 1 identifies five hypothetical sets of four errors, and Section 3 says their RMSE increases as the error magnitudes become more variable. The paper gives the bounds as MAE ≤ RMSE ≤ √n × MAE; with four errors and an MAE of 2.0, those bounds are 2.0 and 4.0. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)
boostedstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, we show that the RMSE satisfies the triangle inequality requirement for a distance metric, whereas Willmott et al. (2009) indicated that the sums-ofsquares-based statistics do not satisfy this rule.”
- Also stated in: § 3 Triangle inequality of a metric · boosted
“This proves that RMSE satisfies the triangle inequality required for a distance function metric.”
- Also stated in: § 4 Summary and discussion · boosted
“In addition, we demonstrate that the RMSE satisfies the triangle inequality required for a distance function metric.”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > Abstract
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 3 Triangle inequality of a metric · boosted
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“When the sample size reaches 100 or above, using the calculated RMSEs one can re-construct the error distribution close to its “truth” or “exact solution”, with its standard deviation within 5 % to its truth (i.e., SE = 1).”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 2 Interpretation of RMSE and MAE
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The errors are unbiased and follow a normal distribution when presenting the RMSE.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The uncertainties brought in by observation errors or the method used to compare model and observations are not considered.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For instance, Table 1 shows that neither the RMSEs nor the MAEs are robust when only 4 or 10 samples are used to calculate those values.”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 2 Interpretation of RMSE and MAE
plainn = 10- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The errors are unbiased and follow a normal distribution when presenting the RMSE.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The uncertainties brought in by observation errors or the method used to compare model and observations are not considered.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The RMSE is more appropriate to represent model performance than the MAE when the error distribution is expected to be Gaussian.”
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · plain
“When the error distribution is expected to be Gaussian and there are enough samples, the RMSE has an advantage over the MAE to illustrate the error distribution.”
- Also stated in: § 4 Summary and discussion · plain
“We present that the RMSE is not ambiguous in its meaning, and it is more appropriate to use than the MAE when model errors follow a normal distribution.”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Model errors are likely to have a normal distribution rather than a uniform distribution.
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · plain
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Giving higher weighting to the unfavorable conditions, the RMSE usually is better at revealing model performance differences.”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 4 Summary and discussion
hedgedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The L1-norm and L2-norm are closely related to the MAE and the RMSE, respectively, as shown in Eqs. ( 3) and ( 4): Horn and Johnson, 1990).”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 3 Triangle inequality of a metric
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Horn and Johnson, 1990
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
In the paper
“In this technical note, we demonstrate that the RMSE is not ambiguous in its meaning, contrary to what was claimed by Willmott et al. (2009).”
- Also stated in: § 4 Summary and discussion · plain
“We present that the RMSE is not ambiguous in its meaning, and it is more appropriate to use than the MAE when model errors follow a normal distribution.”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Willmott et al. (2009)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 4 Summary and discussion · plain
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“One distinct advantage of RMSEs over MAEs is that RM-SEs avoid the use of absolute value, which is highly undesirable in many mathematical calculations.”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 4 Summary and discussion
boostedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Similarly, one can readily show that, for several sets of errors with the same RMSE, the MAE would vary from set to set.”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 1 Introduction
hedgedstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 10
- It may state two separate claims as one. 2
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“They summarized that the RMSE tends to become increasingly larger than the MAE (but not necessarily in a monotonic fashion) as the distribution of error magnitudes becomes more variable.”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 1 Introduction
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Willmott and Matsuura (2005) source
The Concluding Remarks state the attributed point directly, including the qualification that the increase need not be monotonic. (LLM, conf=0.95)
hedgedstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“They concluded that the RMSE varies with the variability of the the error magnitudes and the total-error or averageerror magnitude (MAE), and the sample size n.”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 1 Introduction
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Willmott and Matsuura (2005) source
The Concluding Remarks state that RMSE depends on error-magnitude variability, MAE, and the square root of sample size. The claim says it varies with sample size n, which accurately conveys that dependence without asserting that the relationship is linear. (LLM, conf=0.93)
boostedstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Willmott and Matsuura (2005) have simply proved that the RMSE is not equivalent to the MAE, and one cannot easily derive the MAE value from the RMSE (and vice versa).”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 1 Introduction
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Willmott and Matsuura (2005) source
Section 3 describes an inconsistent relationship between MAE and RMSE, including cases where RMSE changes with error-magnitude variance. Section 4 explains that RMSE depends on MAE, the distribution of error magnitudes, and the number of errors. This supports the claim that the measures are not equivalent and that one cannot generally derive either value from the other alone. (LLM, conf=0.90)
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Table 1 shows that the MAEs converge to 0.8, an approximation to the expectation of 2 π .”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 2 Interpretation of RMSE and MAE
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The errors are unbiased and follow a normal distribution when presenting the RMSE.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The uncertainties brought in by observation errors or the method used to compare model and observations are not considered.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“When both metrics are calculated, the RMSE is by definition never smaller than the MAE.”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 1 Introduction
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The MAE is suitable to describe uniformly distributed errors.”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 2 Interpretation of RMSE and MAE
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For other kinds of distributions, more statistical moments of model errors, such as mean, variance, skewness, and flatness, are needed to provide a complete picture of the model error variation.”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 4 Summary and discussion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The ratio of RMSE to MAE ranged from 1.63 to 2.29 (see Table 1 of Chai et al., 2009).”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 1 Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Chai et al., 2009 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In many of the model sensitivity studies that use only RMSE, a detailed interpretation is not critical because variations of the same model will have similar error distributions.”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 4 Summary and discussion
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As every statistical measure condenses a large number of data into a single value, it only provides one projection of the model errors emphasizing a certain aspect of the error characteristics of the model performance.”
- Also stated in: § 4 Summary and discussion · plain
“As stated earlier, any single metric provides only one projection of the model errors and, therefore, only emphasizes a certain aspect of the error characteristics.”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 1 Introduction
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Also stated in: § 4 Summary and discussion · plain
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A combination of metrics, including but certainly not limited to RMSEs and MAEs, are often required to assess model performance.”
- Also stated in: § 4 Summary and discussion · plain
“A combination of metrics, including but certainly not limited to RMSEs and MAEs, are often required to assess model performance.”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Also stated in: § 4 Summary and discussion · plain
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While the MAE gives the same weight to all errors, the RMSE penalizes variance as it gives errors with larger absolute values more weight than errors with smaller absolute values.”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 1 Introduction
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The authors state this as an assumption.
The errors are unbiased and follow a normal distribution when presenting the RMSE.
“The underlying assumption when presenting the RMSE is that the errors are unbiased and follow a normal distribution.”
“We also assume the error sample set is unbiased.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Model errors are likely to have a normal distribution rather than a uniform distribution.
“Because model errors are likely to have a normal distribution rather than a uniform distribution, the RMSE is a better metric to present than the MAE for such a type of data.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The uncertainties brought in by observation errors or the method used to compare model and observations are not considered.
“The uncertainties brought in by observation errors or the method used to compare model and observations are not considered here.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There are often hundreds of observations available to calculate model statistics.
“Fortunately, there are often hundreds of observations available to calculate model statistics, unlike the examples with n = 4 (Willmott and Matsuura, 2005) and n = 10 ( Willmott et al., 2009).”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 4 Summary and discussion
“| 4 | 0.92, 0.65, 1.48, 1.02, 0.79 0.70, 0.57, 1.33, 1.16, 0.76 | |”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 1 Introduction
“When both metrics are calculated, the RMSE is by definition never smaller than the MAE.”
Citations
Cites
Horn, R. A., & Johnson, C. R. (1985) · Cited by 22,203
David, F. N., & Tukey, J. W. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529486 · Cited by 12,707
Willmott, C., & Matsuura, K. (2005) · Climate Research · doi:10.3354/cr030079 · Cited by 6,512 · cited 4×
“Further, Willmott et al. (2009) concluded that the sums-of-squaresbased error statistics such as the RMSE and the standard error have inherent ambiguities and recommended the use of alternates such as the MAE.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialHuber, P. J., & Ronchetti, E. M. (2009) · Wiley series in probability and statistics · doi:10.1002/9780470434697 · Cited by 1,823
Ambiguities inherent in sums-of-squares-based error statistics
Willmott, C. J., Matsuura, K., & Robeson, S. M. (2008) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.10.005 · Cited by 212 · cited 1×
“Fortunately, there are often hundreds of observations available to calculate model statistics, unlike the examples with n= 4 (Willmott and Matsuura, 2005) and n= 10 (Willmott et al., 2009).”
BackgroundMcKeen, S. A., Wilczak, J. M., Grell, G., et al. (2005) · Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2005jd005858 · Cited by 208
Savage, N., Agnew, P., Davis, L. S., Ordóñez, C., Thorpe, R., Johnson, C. E., O’Connor, F. M., & Dalvi, M. (2013) · Geoscientific model development · doi:10.5194/gmd-6-353-2013 · Cited by 128
Taylor, M. H., Lösch, M., Wenzel, M., et al. (2013) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/jcli-d-13-00089.1 · Cited by 93
Chai, T., Kim, H. C., Lee, P., et al. (2013) · Geoscientific model development · doi:10.5194/gmd-6-1831-2013 · Cited by 87
Self-citationA multi-physics ensemble of present-day climate regional simulations over the Iberian Peninsula
Jerez, S., Montávez, J. P., Jiménez‐Guerrero, P., et al. (2012) · Climate Dynamics · doi:10.1007/s00382-012-1539-1 · Cited by 80 · cited 2×
“(2009) (e.g., Taylor et al., 2013; Chatterjee et al., 2013; Jerez et al., 2013).”
Method
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 5,101–5,200 of 7,174
QSAR Regression Models for Predicting the Activity of Inhibitors of Staphylococcus Epidermidis
Desai, S. A. (2022) · International Journal of Quantitative Structure-Property Relationships · doi:10.4018/ijqspr.313712 · Cited by 1
Robb, S., Nion, Y. A., Anggreini, T., et al. (2023) · International Journal of Wildland Fire · doi:10.1071/wf22067 · Cited by 1
Empirical Study of Stacked Model for Predicting Various Data
Bhosale, U. R., Sutaone, M., & Narkhede, M. (2022) · International Conference on Signal and Information Processing · doi:10.1109/iconsip49665.2022.10007438 · Cited by 1
Exploiting high-slip flow regimes to improve inference of glacier bed topography
Morin, A., Flowers, G. E., Nolan, A., et al. (2023) · Journal of Glaciology · doi:10.1017/jog.2022.121 · Cited by 1
Geophysical Data Inversion in a Gold-Rich Porphyry System: A Case Study of the Dalli Deposit, Iran
Moshtaghian, K., Hajheidari, M., Forooshani, S. M. A., et al. (2023) · Natural Resources Research · doi:10.1007/s11053-023-10165-9 · Cited by 1
Kiram, J. J., Yunus, R. M., Japarudin, Y., et al. (2023) · AIP conference proceedings · doi:10.1063/5.0110076 · Cited by 1
On the Performance of Bayesian Generalized Dissimilarity Model Estimator
Lusiana, E. D., Astutik, S., Nurjannah, N., & Sambah, A. B. (2023) · Mathematics and Statistics · doi:10.13189/ms.2023.110118 · Cited by 2
Self-Control and Procrastination during the Covid-19 Pandemic
Sarirah, T., & Sihombing, D. D. S. (2023) · Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research/Advances in social science, education and humanities research · doi:10.2991/978-2-494069-49-7_2 · Cited by 1
The Research on the Prediction of Cryptocurrency Based on Linear Regression and LSTM
Ding, F. (2023) · Atlantis Highlights in Computer Sciences/Atlantis highlights in computer sciences · doi:10.2991/978-94-6463-102-9_154 · Cited by 1
Comparative analysis of methods for the similarity assessment of geofields
Gvozdev, O. G., Викторович, М. А., & A.А., M. (2022) · Vestnik SSUGT (Siberian State University of Geosystems and Technologies) · doi:10.33764/2411-1759-2022-27-6-120-130 · Cited by 1
Medium and Long Term Power Load Forecasting Based on Stacked-GRU
Yang, Z., Cui, J., Zhang, Q., et al. (2023) · Strategic Planning for Energy and the Environment · doi:10.13052/spee1048-5236.4141 · Cited by 1
Distributed Item Recommendation Using Sentiment Analysis
Singh, T., Rajput, V., Sharma, N., et al. (2023) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-981-19-6631-6_19 · Cited by 1
FSRSI: New Deep Learning-Based Approach for Super-Resolution of Multispectral Satellite Images
Soufi, O., & Belouadha, F.-Z. (2023) · Ingénierie des systèmes d information · doi:10.18280/isi.280112 · Cited by 1
Implicit User Network Analysis of Communication Platform Open Data for Channel Recommendation
Bobić, A., Jakovljevic, I., Gütl, C., et al. (2022) · International Conference on Social Networks Analysis, Management and Security (SNAMS) · doi:10.1109/snams58071.2022.10062597 · Cited by 1
Pemodelan Kekuatan Gelombang di Pesisir Barat Kecamatan Kuta, Bali
Kenoly, T., Hendrawan, I. G., & Dirgayusa, I. G. N. P. (2023) · Journal of Marine Research and Technology · doi:10.24843/jmrt.2023.v06.i01.p06 · Cited by 1
Taha, A., Barakat, B., Taha, M. M. A., et al. (2023) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi15040134 · Cited by 1
Prediksi Harga Gabah Kering Panen Menggunakan Exponential Smoothing dan Weighted Moving Average
Darwati, I., & Hayuningtyas, R. Y. (2023) · Swabumi · doi:10.31294/swabumi.v11i1.15477 · Cited by 1
Frequency Seismic Response for EEWS Testing on Uniaxial Shaking Table
Donciu, C., Serea, E., & Temneanu, M. C. (2023) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e25040655 · Cited by 1
A Fast and Robust Photometric Redshift Forecasting Method Using Lipschitz Adaptive Learning Rate
Sen, S., Saha, S., Chakraborty, P., et al. (2023) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-1642-9_11 · Cited by 1
Fu, T., Zheng, W., Li, Z., et al. (2023) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs15082188 · Cited by 1
Guangzhou Housing Price Prediction Based On Machine Learning Regression Models
Huang, Z., Li, K., Wang, C., et al. (2023) · Highlights in Science Engineering and Technology · doi:10.54097/hset.v44i.7355 · Cited by 1
Galleto, F. A., Cabatuan, M. K., & Africa, A. D. M. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Humanoid, Nanotechnology, Information Technology, Communication and Control, Environment, and Management (HNICEM) · doi:10.1109/hnicem57413.2022.10109477 · Cited by 1
An Integrative Approach Towards Recommending Farming Solutions for Sustainable Agriculture
Ghuriani, V., Wassan, J. T., Deolal, P., et al. (2023) · Journal of Experimental Biology and Agricultural Sciences · doi:10.18006/2023.11(2).306.315 · Cited by 1
Predicción de la presión de burbujeo utilizando aprendizaje automático
Gil, O. (2023) · Innovación y software · doi:10.48168/innosoft.s11.a82 · Cited by 1
Evolutionary Parameter Optimization on Neural Network Models for Earthquake Prediction
Gunawan, G., Andriani, W., Purnomo, H. D., et al. (2023) · doi:10.1109/iccosite57641.2023.10127850 · Cited by 1
Diamond Price Prediction Using Machine Learning Algorithms
Mankawade, A., Kokate, C., Soman, K. P., et al. (2023) · International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology · doi:10.22214/ijraset.2023.52741 · Cited by 1
Vazifehkhah, S., Kahya, E., Gao, W., et al. (2023) · Theoretical and Applied Climatology · doi:10.1007/s00704-023-04492-3 · Cited by 1
Satellite Imagery-based Prediction of Poverty using Faster R-CNN
Raman, D. R., Vidhya, S., & Navinkumar, N. M. (2023) · International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Control Systems (ICICCS) · doi:10.1109/iciccs56967.2023.10142570 · Cited by 1
Solar Prediction Strategy for Managing Virtual Power Stations
Cahyadi, C. I., Suwarno, S., Dewi, A. A., Kona, M., Arif, M., & Akbar, M. C. (2023) · International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy · doi:10.32479/ijeep.14124 · Cited by 1
Tripathi, A. N., & Sharma, B. (2023) · Lecture notes in mechanical engineering · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-2921-4_3 · Cited by 1
Leyva-López, S., Hernández-Nava, G., Mena-Camilo, E., et al. (2023) · IEEE Conference on Artificial Intelligence (CAI) · doi:10.1109/cai54212.2023.00078 · Cited by 1
Developing Energy Demand Forecasting Methods
Takano, W. Y., & Asada, E. N. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-97940-9_47 · Cited by 1
Çizmeci, İ. H., & Altun, A. A. (2023) · Applied Bionics and Biomechanics · doi:10.1155/2023/9169050 · Cited by 1
Chinchilla-Sánchez, M., Gaona, J. L. S., Martínez‐Crespo, J., et al. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering and IEEE Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Europe (EEEIC / I&CPS Europe) · doi:10.1109/eeeic/icpseurope57605.2023.10194755 · Cited by 1
A Study on Future Lockdown Predictions using ANN
Das, S. S., Anik, A. S., Hossain, M. M., et al. (2023) · International Conference on Next-Generation Computing, IoT and Machine Learning (NCIM) · doi:10.1109/ncim59001.2023.10212686 · Cited by 1
Calibração de métodos empíricos para estimativa de vapotranspiração de referência no oeste do Paraná
Giovanella, T. H., de Oliveira, F. C., Tluszcz, J., et al. (2023) · OBSERVATÓRIO DE LA ECONOMÍA LATINOAMERICANA · doi:10.55905/oelv21n8-138 · Cited by 1
Forecasting and Evaluation of Non-Performing Loans in the Turkish Banking Sector
Altınbaş, H., & Hanişoğlu, G. S. (2023) · Istanbul Business Research · doi:10.26650/ibr.2023.52.994354 · Cited by 1
Akın, D., Raja, A. A., AlAteah, A. H., Almonbhi, A. O., Sisiopiku, V. P., & Al-Sodani, K. A. A. (2023) · Atmospheric Pollution Research · doi:10.1016/j.apr.2023.101920 · Cited by 1
Non-invasive Prediction of Hemoglobin using Picture of Conjunctiva
Kwon, M., Jang, I., & Kim, K. (2023) · International Conference on Platform Technology and Service · doi:10.1109/platcon60102.2023.10255170 · Cited by 1
Shafi, M. A., Rusiman, M. S., Jacob, K., et al. (2023) · Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.3233/jifs-231814 · Cited by 1
Root Mean Square Error of the Maximum Likelihood Estimate of the Parameters of Pareto Distribution
Cabanlit, E. A., & Cruz, K. D. D. (2023) · International Journal Of Scientific Advances · doi:10.51542/ijscia.v4i5.6 · Cited by 1
Research on Wheat Density Estimation Method Based on Multi-sensor Information Fusion
Zhang, Y., Zou, R., Li, R., et al. (2023) · International Symposium on Computer Engineering and Intelligent Communications (ISCEIC) · doi:10.1109/isceic59030.2023.10271231 · Cited by 1
Soltanian, A. R., Razdari, R. A., Mahjub, H., & Poorolajal, J. (2023) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-023-16879-y · Cited by 1
Abdillah, W., Fauziati, S., & Pratama, A. R. (2023) · International Conference on Computer, Control, Informatics and its Applications · doi:10.1109/ic3ina60834.2023.10285764 · Cited by 1
Research on Non-Invasive Blood Glucose Detection Method Based on PSO-GRNN
Zhang, J., Wu, Y., Sheng, M., Chen, W., Cao, R., Tan, H., & Zhang, J. (2022) · International Conference on Intelligent Manufacturing and Industrial Big Data (ICIMIBD) · doi:10.1109/icimibd58123.2022.00035 · Cited by 1
Modeling and Forecasting Exchange Rate Volatility in West Africa using GARCH models
Dukundane, D. (2023) · Journal of Statistical and Econometric Methods · doi:10.47260/jsem/1242 · Cited by 1
Donkor, L., Affrifah, N. S., Kunadu, A. P., et al. (2023) · International Journal of Food Science · doi:10.1155/2023/1011319 · Cited by 1
Enabling Inter-Product Transfer Learning on MCU Performance Screening
Bellarmino, N., Cantoro, R., Huch, M., et al. (2023) · Proceedings - Asian Test Symposium/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/ats59501.2023.10317992 · Cited by 1
Nozari, H., Vanaei, A., & Faraji, F. (2023) · Sustainable Water Resources Management · doi:10.1007/s40899-023-00977-1 · Cited by 1
Jianguo, G., Zhang, B., Liu, Y., et al. (2023) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app132413066 · Cited by 1
Srinivasan, U., Muthuveerappan, N., & Sudhindra, K. R. (2023) · Journal of Aerospace Sciences and Technologies · doi:10.61653/joast.v72i1.2020.80 · Cited by 1
Study on Autoencoder-based Plant Piping Leak Detection
Park, S., Kim, J., Yeo, D., et al. (2023) · The Journal of Korean Institute of Information Technology · doi:10.14801/jkiit.2023.21.11.1 · Cited by 1
Modeling and Forecasting the Domestic Retail Price of Teff in Ethiopia
Gagabo, S. Y. (2023) · International Journal of Data Science and Analysis · doi:10.11648/j.ijdsa.20230902.12 · Cited by 1
Anđelić, N., & Šegota, S. B. (2023) · Technologies · doi:10.3390/technologies11060185 · Cited by 1
Bitcoin price and return prediction based on LSTM
Yang, R. (2023) · Theoretical and Natural Science · doi:10.54254/2753-8818/26/20241021 · Cited by 1
Iqbal, S., & Mehran, K. (2023) · IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE) · doi:10.1109/ecce53617.2023.10362250 · Cited by 1
Predicting Twitter stock price using linear regression, random forest, and MLP regression
Huang, Z. (2024) · Theoretical and Natural Science · doi:10.54254/2753-8818/30/20241093 · Cited by 1
Studi Pemodelan Pengendalian Kendaraan Bermotor untuk Menurunkan Polusi Udara di Jakarta
Samudra, A. A., & Hertasning, B. (2024) · Jurnal Penelitian Transportasi Darat · doi:10.25104/jptd.v25i2.2280 · Cited by 1
Qur’ani, A. Y., & Widyaningrum, C. S. (2024) · Mikailalsys Journal of Mathematics and Statistics · doi:10.58578/mjms.v2i1.2673 · Cited by 1
SeaNet: A Deep Learning Architecture for Enhanced Sea Surface Temperature Forecasting
Chauhan, R., Saxena, A. K., Chauhan, D., et al. (2023) · doi:10.1109/ici60088.2023.10420923 · Cited by 1
Dassamiour, M., Samai, D., Faghmous, N., & Boustila, R. (2024) · International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1007/s13762-023-05452-0 · Cited by 1
Evaluating Depth Estimation Algorithms in Unstructured Driving Environments
Patil, K., Patil, P., & Kaveshgar, M. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) · doi:10.1109/itsc57777.2023.10421800 · Cited by 1
Evidence for Soil Phosphorus Resource Partitioning in a Diverse Tropical Tree Community
Müller, R., Elsenbeer, H., & Turner, B. L. (2024) · Forests · doi:10.3390/f15020361 · Cited by 1
Dananjaya, R. H., Sutrisno, S., & Apriliani, T. (2024) · Matriks Teknik Sipil · doi:10.20961/mateksi.v11i3.65116 · Cited by 1
Towards Optimizing Hybrid Movie Recommender Systems
Khalil, H. A. (2024) · Revue d intelligence artificielle · doi:10.18280/ria.380116 · Cited by 1
Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, S. L. P., & Campos-Aranda, D. F. (2024) · Tecnología y Ciencias del Agua · doi:10.24850/j-tyca-15-02-01 · Cited by 1
Depth Estimation Using Weighted-Loss and Transfer Learning
Hafeez, M. A., Madden, M. G., Sistu, G., & Ullah, I. (2024) · International Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics Theory and Applications (VISIGRAPP) · doi:10.5220/0012461300003660 · Cited by 1
Distance Metric Analysis in Recommendation System Using Content-Based Filtering Method
CHRISTINA, C., Sanjaya, F., Cahyaningtyas, V. T., et al. (2023) · International Conference on Information and Communications Technology (ICOIACT) · doi:10.1109/icoiact59844.2023.10455814 · Cited by 1
Zhang, Z., Wang, P., & He, M. (2024) · The Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Journal (ACES) · doi:10.13052/2023.aces.j.380808 · Cited by 1
Comparative Analysis of ML Models for Currency Exchange Rate Prediction
Rami, K., Rajput, A., Shripathi, N., Patel, J. D., & Patel, R. (2024) · International Journal of Computer Science and Mobile Computing · doi:10.47760/ijcsmc.2024.v13i03.004 · Cited by 1
Harshith, K. V., Ragini, H. R., Meenakshi, J., et al. (2024) · International Journal of Environment and Climate Change · doi:10.9734/ijecc/2024/v14i34073 · Cited by 1
Che, J.-L., & Chang, S. (2024) · International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology · doi:10.1007/s40684-024-00611-1 · Cited by 1
Nguyen, V.-H., Le, T.-T., & Nguyen, A.-T. (2024) · Lecture notes in mechanical engineering · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-39090-6_23 · Cited by 1
Research Octane Number Prediction Based on Feature Selection and Multi-Model Fusion
Gu, J. (2024) · International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications · doi:10.14569/ijacsa.2024.01503114 · Cited by 1
TES-CVIDS: A Transmission Efficient Sub-Map Based Collaborative Dense VI-SLAM Framework
Zhang, T., Zhang, L., Zhang, F., Zhao, S., & Zhou, Y. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles · doi:10.1109/tiv.2024.3385452 · Cited by 1
Uzakov, G. N., Седнин, В. А., Safarov, A. B., et al. (2024) · ENERGETIKA Proceedings of CIS higher education institutions and power engineering associations · doi:10.21122/1029-7448-2024-67-2-97-114 · Cited by 1
Lee, B., Yeom, G., & Jeong, J. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Internet of Things (iThings) and IEEE Green Computing and Communications (GreenCom) and IEEE Cyber, Physical and Social Computing (CPSCom) and IEEE Smart Data (SmartData) · doi:10.1109/ithings-greencom-cpscom-smartdata-cybermatics60724.2023.00094 · Cited by 1
Xie, F., Guan, X., Peng, X., et al. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16093823 · Cited by 1
Babu, K. T. S., & Kodabagi, M. M. (2024) · SN Computer Science · doi:10.1007/s42979-024-02815-3 · Cited by 1
Lee, S. J., Kim, S. G., Kim, C., et al. (2024) · International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences · doi:10.1007/s42405-024-00751-3 · Cited by 1
Comparing Effectiveness of Statistical Versus Deep Learning for Time Series Forecasting
Yadav, H. N., Thakkar, A. R., Rochwani, N., & Patel, R. (2024) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-1313-4_22 · Cited by 1
Bhardwaj, A., Srivastava, H. S., & Singh, R. P. (2024) · doi:10.3390/ecrs2023-16887 · Cited by 1
Weather Data and Agro-climate Indices -- Comparative Study
Li, Y., Zainab, S. S. E., Dhelim, S., et al. (2024) · International Conference on Machine Learning and Computing (ICMLC) · doi:10.1145/3651671.3651729 · Cited by 1
Hagelberg, A., André, D. B., & Finnis, M. V. (2024) · IET Radar Sonar & Navigation · doi:10.1049/rsn2.12588 · Cited by 1
Kurniawan, K., Ceasaro, B., & Sucipto, S. (2024) · Jurnal Edukasi dan Penelitian Informatika (JEPIN) · doi:10.26418/jp.v10i1.72866 · Cited by 1
Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, S. L. P., & Campos-Aranda, D. F. (2024) · Tecnología y Ciencias del Agua · doi:10.24850/j-tyca-2024-04-03 · Cited by 1
Setiyorini, T., & Frieyadie, F. (2024) · Jurnal Riset Informatika · doi:10.34288/jri.v6i3.288 · Cited by 1
Stock Price Prediction Using ARIMA, LR and LSTM
Jha, A., Kulkarni, S., Kulkarni, P., & Bhatt, A. (2024) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-3180-0_55 · Cited by 1
Venu, V., Anjitha, P. K., Vipin, P., et al. (2024) · Asian Journal of Dairy and Food Research · doi:10.18805/ajdfr.dr-2199 · Cited by 1
Hüsrevoğlu, M., & Karkınlı, A. E. (2024) · International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science Engineering and Information Technology · doi:10.32628/cseit24104116 · Cited by 1
Kim, M., & Lee, S.-J. (2024) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics13152901 · Cited by 1
Luo, Z., Liu, H., & Ouyang, Z. (2024) · International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics · doi:10.1142/s0219455425502074 · Cited by 1
Updated Lagrangian Particle Hydrodynamics (ULPH) Modeling of Natural Convection Problems
Xiong, J., Wang, Z., Li, S., et al. (2024) · Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences · doi:10.32604/cmes.2024.053078 · Cited by 1
Effects of Lockdown on Electricity Demand Patterns of Institutional Buildings
Alisoltani, N., Nefzaoui, E., & Oukhellou, L. (2024) · IEEE International Workshop on Metrology for Living Environment (MetroLivEnv) · doi:10.1109/metrolivenv60384.2024.10615277 · Cited by 1
SolvPredict: A Comprehensive Exploration of Predictive Models for Molecule Solubility
Aitouhanni, I., & Berqia, A. A. (2024) · International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Computer Vision (ISCV) · doi:10.1109/iscv60512.2024.10620130 · Cited by 1
Multimodal Fusion for Brain Medical Image Segmentation using MMSegNet
Sankar, S., Kumar, D. V. S., Kumar, P., & Kumar, M. R. (2024) · International Conference on Intelligent Technologies (CONIT) · doi:10.1109/conit61985.2024.10627205 · Cited by 1
A Robust Multiple Adaptive Derivative Face Recognition System on Pose and Illumination
Pailus, R. H., & Alfred, R. (2024) · Lecture notes in electrical engineering · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-2977-7_11 · Cited by 1
Xiao, Y., Cui, Y., Koskinen, J. H., et al. (2024) · Journal of Mechanical Design · doi:10.1115/1.4066426 · Cited by 1
Chen, W., Zhou, C., Zhang, H., et al. (2024) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app14178007 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Chai, T., & Draxler, R. R.
- Affiliations
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (US)
- Venue
- Geoscientific Model Development
- Publisher
- Copernicus GmbH
- Published
- 2014-06-30
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1247-1250
- ISSN
- 1991-959X (ISSN-L)
- 1991-9603
- OpenAlex
- W2102148524
- Semantic Scholar
- 8c42db1839098b46f18265907464c16e49bb7a1c
- Cited by
- 7,178
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1015 · 2025: 1120 · 2024: 980 · 2023: 873 · 2022: 751 · 2021: 683 · 2020: 538 · 2019: 411 · 2018: 324 · 2017: 235 · 2016: 175 · 2015: 59 · 2014: 13
- FWCI
- 106.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Geoscientific model development (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NA09NES4400006)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Forecasting Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- root mean square error, mean absolute error, model evaluation metrics, error distribution, Gaussian errors, triangle inequality, distance measures, model evaluation, hydrological model evaluation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-17, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-17 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
