The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 4 of the 8 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? – Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Abstract. Both the root mean square error (RMSE) and the mean absolute error (MAE) are regularly employed in model evaluation studies. Willmott and Matsuura (2005) have suggested that the RMSE is not a good indicator of average model performance and might be a misleading indicator of average error, and thus the MAE would be a better metric for that purpose. While some concerns over using RMSE raised by Willmott and Matsuura (2005) and Willmott et al. (2009) are valid, the proposed avoidance of RMSE in favor of MAE is not the solution. Citing the aforementioned papers, many researchers chose MAE over RMSE to present their model evaluation statistics when presenting or adding the RMSE measures could be more beneficial. In this technical note, we demonstrate that the RMSE is not ambiguous in its meaning, contrary to what was claimed by Willmott et al. (2009). The RMSE is more appropriate to represent model performance than the MAE when the error distribution is expected to be Gaussian. In addition, we show that the RMSE satisfies the triangle inequality requirement for a distance metric, whereas Willmott et al. (2009) indicated that the sums-of-squares-based statistics do not satisfy this rule. In the end, we discussed some circumstances where using the RMSE will be more beneficial. However, we do not contend that the RMSE is superior over the MAE. Instead, a combination of metrics, including but certainly not limited to RMSEs and MAEs, are often required to assess model performance.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This technical note argues against the recommendation by Willmott and Matsuura (2005) and Willmott et al. (2009) to abandon RMSE in favor of MAE, showing that RMSE is not ambiguous in meaning and is more appropriate when errors are expected to be Gaussian. The authors also demonstrate that RMSE satisfies the triangle inequality required of a distance metric, contrary to the earlier claims, while concluding that a combination of metrics is often needed.
Key findings
- RMSE is not ambiguous in its meaning, contrary to Willmott et al. (2009); it is more appropriate than MAE when the error distribution is expected to be Gaussian, whereas MAE suits uniformly distributed errors.
- Using randomly generated zero-mean, unit-variance Gaussian pseudo-errors, RMSEs converge to the true standard deviation (SE = 1) once n ≥ 100, with standard deviation within 5% of truth; MAEs converge to 0.8, approximating the expectation of √(2/π). Neither metric is robust at n = 4 or n = 10.
- RMSE satisfies the triangle inequality required for a distance metric: the example in Willmott et al. (2009) (d(a,c)=4, d(a,b)=2, d(b,c)=3) actually represents the MSE, not the RMSE, and the L2-norm proof in Eqs. (5)–(7) shows RMSE does satisfy it.
- RMSE has practical advantages: it avoids absolute values (useful for gradients/sensitivities and data assimilation cost functions) and is generally better at discriminating among model results by weighting unfavorable conditions more heavily.
Methods
- Technical note / commentary design: no new observational dataset; the argument is analytical, using norm theory (L1- and L2-norms linked to MAE and RMSE) and a proof of the triangle inequality for the L2-norm.
- A Monte Carlo-style demonstration: five sets of pseudo-errors of size n = 4, 10, 100, 1000, 10 000, and 1000 000 drawn from a zero-mean, unit-variance Gaussian distribution with different random seeds, comparing RMSEs and MAEs (Table 1).
- Reference to prior empirical example: Chai et al. (2009) reported RMSE-to-MAE ratios of 1.63 to 2.29 for model NO2 column predictions versus SCIAMACHY satellite observations.
Limitations
- Stated by the authors: the analysis assumes unbiased errors and does not consider uncertainties from observation errors or the method used to compare model and observations; all statistics are less useful with limited sample sizes (e.g., n = 4 or 10), where presenting the errors themselves may be more appropriate; for non-normal distributions, additional moments (mean, variance, skewness, flatness) are needed; outliers several orders larger than other samples may justifiably be removed when sample numbers are limited, and systematic errors may need removal before computing RMSEs.
- Evident from the text: the demonstration relies on synthetic Gaussian pseudo-errors rather than real model–observation comparisons, so the convergence results are conditional on the Gaussian assumption; the authors explicitly do not claim RMSE is superior to MAE, so the note offers guidance rather than a definitive metric selection rule.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
14 Own interpretation · 6 No basis given · 4 Supported · 3 Sources not found · 3 Own result · 1 No full text of the sources · 1 Not checked yet
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Using hypothetical sets of four errors, Willmott and Matsuura (2005) demonstrated that while keeping the MAE as a constant of 2.0, the RMSE varies from 2.0 to 4.0.”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 1 Introduction
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Willmott and Matsuura (2005) source
Table 1 identifies five hypothetical sets of four errors, and Section 3 says their RMSE increases as the error magnitudes become more variable. The paper gives the bounds as MAE ≤ RMSE ≤ √n × MAE; with four errors and an MAE of 2.0, those bounds are 2.0 and 4.0. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)
boostedstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, we show that the RMSE satisfies the triangle inequality requirement for a distance metric, whereas Willmott et al. (2009) indicated that the sums-ofsquares-based statistics do not satisfy this rule.”
- Also stated in: § 3 Triangle inequality of a metric · boosted
“This proves that RMSE satisfies the triangle inequality required for a distance function metric.”
- Also stated in: § 4 Summary and discussion · boosted
“In addition, we demonstrate that the RMSE satisfies the triangle inequality required for a distance function metric.”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > Abstract
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 3 Triangle inequality of a metric · boosted
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“When the sample size reaches 100 or above, using the calculated RMSEs one can re-construct the error distribution close to its “truth” or “exact solution”, with its standard deviation within 5 % to its truth (i.e., SE = 1).”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 2 Interpretation of RMSE and MAE
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The errors are unbiased and follow a normal distribution when presenting the RMSE.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The uncertainties brought in by observation errors or the method used to compare model and observations are not considered.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For instance, Table 1 shows that neither the RMSEs nor the MAEs are robust when only 4 or 10 samples are used to calculate those values.”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 2 Interpretation of RMSE and MAE
plainn = 10- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The errors are unbiased and follow a normal distribution when presenting the RMSE.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The uncertainties brought in by observation errors or the method used to compare model and observations are not considered.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The RMSE is more appropriate to represent model performance than the MAE when the error distribution is expected to be Gaussian.”
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · plain
“When the error distribution is expected to be Gaussian and there are enough samples, the RMSE has an advantage over the MAE to illustrate the error distribution.”
- Also stated in: § 4 Summary and discussion · plain
“We present that the RMSE is not ambiguous in its meaning, and it is more appropriate to use than the MAE when model errors follow a normal distribution.”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Model errors are likely to have a normal distribution rather than a uniform distribution.
- Also stated in: § 1 Introduction · plain
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Giving higher weighting to the unfavorable conditions, the RMSE usually is better at revealing model performance differences.”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 4 Summary and discussion
hedgedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The L1-norm and L2-norm are closely related to the MAE and the RMSE, respectively, as shown in Eqs. ( 3) and ( 4): Horn and Johnson, 1990).”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 3 Triangle inequality of a metric
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Horn and Johnson, 1990
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
In the paper
“In this technical note, we demonstrate that the RMSE is not ambiguous in its meaning, contrary to what was claimed by Willmott et al. (2009).”
- Also stated in: § 4 Summary and discussion · plain
“We present that the RMSE is not ambiguous in its meaning, and it is more appropriate to use than the MAE when model errors follow a normal distribution.”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Willmott et al. (2009)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 4 Summary and discussion · plain
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“One distinct advantage of RMSEs over MAEs is that RM-SEs avoid the use of absolute value, which is highly undesirable in many mathematical calculations.”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 4 Summary and discussion
boostedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Similarly, one can readily show that, for several sets of errors with the same RMSE, the MAE would vary from set to set.”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 1 Introduction
hedgedstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 10
- It may state two separate claims as one. 2
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“They summarized that the RMSE tends to become increasingly larger than the MAE (but not necessarily in a monotonic fashion) as the distribution of error magnitudes becomes more variable.”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 1 Introduction
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Willmott and Matsuura (2005) source
The Concluding Remarks state the attributed point directly, including the qualification that the increase need not be monotonic. (LLM, conf=0.95)
hedgedstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“They concluded that the RMSE varies with the variability of the the error magnitudes and the total-error or averageerror magnitude (MAE), and the sample size n.”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 1 Introduction
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Willmott and Matsuura (2005) source
The Concluding Remarks state that RMSE depends on error-magnitude variability, MAE, and the square root of sample size. The claim says it varies with sample size n, which accurately conveys that dependence without asserting that the relationship is linear. (LLM, conf=0.93)
boostedstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Willmott and Matsuura (2005) have simply proved that the RMSE is not equivalent to the MAE, and one cannot easily derive the MAE value from the RMSE (and vice versa).”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 1 Introduction
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Willmott and Matsuura (2005) source
Section 3 describes an inconsistent relationship between MAE and RMSE, including cases where RMSE changes with error-magnitude variance. Section 4 explains that RMSE depends on MAE, the distribution of error magnitudes, and the number of errors. This supports the claim that the measures are not equivalent and that one cannot generally derive either value from the other alone. (LLM, conf=0.90)
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Table 1 shows that the MAEs converge to 0.8, an approximation to the expectation of 2 π .”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 2 Interpretation of RMSE and MAE
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The errors are unbiased and follow a normal distribution when presenting the RMSE.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The uncertainties brought in by observation errors or the method used to compare model and observations are not considered.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“When both metrics are calculated, the RMSE is by definition never smaller than the MAE.”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 1 Introduction
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The MAE is suitable to describe uniformly distributed errors.”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 2 Interpretation of RMSE and MAE
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For other kinds of distributions, more statistical moments of model errors, such as mean, variance, skewness, and flatness, are needed to provide a complete picture of the model error variation.”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 4 Summary and discussion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The ratio of RMSE to MAE ranged from 1.63 to 2.29 (see Table 1 of Chai et al., 2009).”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 1 Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Chai et al., 2009 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In many of the model sensitivity studies that use only RMSE, a detailed interpretation is not critical because variations of the same model will have similar error distributions.”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 4 Summary and discussion
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As every statistical measure condenses a large number of data into a single value, it only provides one projection of the model errors emphasizing a certain aspect of the error characteristics of the model performance.”
- Also stated in: § 4 Summary and discussion · plain
“As stated earlier, any single metric provides only one projection of the model errors and, therefore, only emphasizes a certain aspect of the error characteristics.”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 1 Introduction
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Also stated in: § 4 Summary and discussion · plain
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A combination of metrics, including but certainly not limited to RMSEs and MAEs, are often required to assess model performance.”
- Also stated in: § 4 Summary and discussion · plain
“A combination of metrics, including but certainly not limited to RMSEs and MAEs, are often required to assess model performance.”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Also stated in: § 4 Summary and discussion · plain
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While the MAE gives the same weight to all errors, the RMSE penalizes variance as it gives errors with larger absolute values more weight than errors with smaller absolute values.”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 1 Introduction
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The authors state this as an assumption.
The errors are unbiased and follow a normal distribution when presenting the RMSE.
“The underlying assumption when presenting the RMSE is that the errors are unbiased and follow a normal distribution.”
“We also assume the error sample set is unbiased.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Model errors are likely to have a normal distribution rather than a uniform distribution.
“Because model errors are likely to have a normal distribution rather than a uniform distribution, the RMSE is a better metric to present than the MAE for such a type of data.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The uncertainties brought in by observation errors or the method used to compare model and observations are not considered.
“The uncertainties brought in by observation errors or the method used to compare model and observations are not considered here.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There are often hundreds of observations available to calculate model statistics.
“Fortunately, there are often hundreds of observations available to calculate model statistics, unlike the examples with n = 4 (Willmott and Matsuura, 2005) and n = 10 ( Willmott et al., 2009).”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 4 Summary and discussion
“| 4 | 0.92, 0.65, 1.48, 1.02, 0.79 0.70, 0.57, 1.33, 1.16, 0.76 | |”
§ Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? -Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature > 1 Introduction
“When both metrics are calculated, the RMSE is by definition never smaller than the MAE.”
Citations
Cites
Horn, R. A., & Johnson, C. R. (1985) · Cited by 22,203
David, F. N., & Tukey, J. W. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529486 · Cited by 12,707
Willmott, C., & Matsuura, K. (2005) · Climate Research · doi:10.3354/cr030079 · Cited by 6,512 · cited 4×
“Further, Willmott et al. (2009) concluded that the sums-of-squaresbased error statistics such as the RMSE and the standard error have inherent ambiguities and recommended the use of alternates such as the MAE.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialHuber, P. J., & Ronchetti, E. M. (2009) · Wiley series in probability and statistics · doi:10.1002/9780470434697 · Cited by 1,823
Ambiguities inherent in sums-of-squares-based error statistics
Willmott, C. J., Matsuura, K., & Robeson, S. M. (2008) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.10.005 · Cited by 212 · cited 1×
“Fortunately, there are often hundreds of observations available to calculate model statistics, unlike the examples with n= 4 (Willmott and Matsuura, 2005) and n= 10 (Willmott et al., 2009).”
BackgroundMcKeen, S. A., Wilczak, J. M., Grell, G., et al. (2005) · Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2005jd005858 · Cited by 208
Savage, N., Agnew, P., Davis, L. S., Ordóñez, C., Thorpe, R., Johnson, C. E., O’Connor, F. M., & Dalvi, M. (2013) · Geoscientific model development · doi:10.5194/gmd-6-353-2013 · Cited by 128
Taylor, M. H., Lösch, M., Wenzel, M., et al. (2013) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/jcli-d-13-00089.1 · Cited by 93
Chai, T., Kim, H. C., Lee, P., et al. (2013) · Geoscientific model development · doi:10.5194/gmd-6-1831-2013 · Cited by 87
Self-citationA multi-physics ensemble of present-day climate regional simulations over the Iberian Peninsula
Jerez, S., Montávez, J. P., Jiménez‐Guerrero, P., et al. (2012) · Climate Dynamics · doi:10.1007/s00382-012-1539-1 · Cited by 80 · cited 2×
“(2009) (e.g., Taylor et al., 2013; Chatterjee et al., 2013; Jerez et al., 2013).”
Method
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 5,201–5,300 of 7,174
Li, H., Ren, K., Sun, W., et al. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2024.3457010 · Cited by 1
Enhancing Face Recognition Systems by Focusing on Pose Robustness
Pailus, R. H. (2024) · Studies in systems, decision and control · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-67317-7_28 · Cited by 1
Trajectory Privacy-Protection Mechanism Based on Multidimensional Spatial–Temporal Prediction
Xi, J., Shi, M., Zhang, W., Xu, Z., & Liu, Y. (2024) · Symmetry · doi:10.3390/sym16091248 · Cited by 1
Prediction of Health Indicators Based on Exercise, Sleep, and Water Intake
Ashraf, H., Jhanjhi, N. Z., Ihsan, U., et al. (2024) · Advances in human and social aspects of technology book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-8939-3.ch010 · Cited by 1
A Deep Learning Based System For a Long-term Elderly Behavioral Drift Detection
Zekri, D., Snoun, A., Delot, T., & Thilliez, M. (2024) · SN Computer Science · doi:10.1007/s42979-024-03207-3 · Cited by 1
Lin, W., Chen, Y., Wu, X., Chen, Y., Gao, Y., & Zuo, C. (2024) · Optical Engineering · doi:10.1117/1.oe.63.11.111812 · Cited by 1
Is This Code the Best? Or Can It Be Further Improved? Developer Stats to the Rescue
Ahmed, W., & Harbaoui, A. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3472481 · Cited by 1
Vahedi, J., Niazifar, M., Ghahremanzadeh, M., Taghizadeh, A., Abachi, S., Palangı, V., & Lackner, M. K. (2024) · World · doi:10.3390/world5040044 · Cited by 1
Si, Y., Li, S., & He, S. (2024) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2024.128674 · Cited by 1
Optimizing sheep growth curves using a meta-heuristic algorithm
Benvenga, M. A. C., Nääs, I. D. A., Lima, N. D. D. S., et al. (2024) · Tropical Animal Health and Production · doi:10.1007/s11250-024-04188-4 · Cited by 1
Babaali, H., Dehghani, R., & Dehghani, F. (2024) · Environmental Challenges · doi:10.1016/j.envc.2024.101039 · Cited by 1
Jha, V., & Tripathi, P. (2024) · Ad Hoc Networks · doi:10.1016/j.adhoc.2024.103700 · Cited by 1
Geometry-Aware Mixed Reality Navigation Framework for Robotic Endoscopic Cannulation
Liu, H., Yang, Y., Zhang, Y., et al. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Cyber Technology in Automation, Control, and Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1109/cyber63482.2024.10749119 · Cited by 1
Aitouhanni, I., & Berqia, A. A. (2024) · Lecture notes in information systems and organisation · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-75329-9_8 · Cited by 1
Assessing the Impact Of Time Intervals On PM2.5 Prediction Using LSTM Neural Networks
Boulkamh, S., Zeghib, N., & Yaddaden, Y. (2024) · International Conference on Advanced Electrical Engineering (ICAEE) · doi:10.1109/icaee61760.2024.10783332 · Cited by 1
Fundus-Based RNFL Quadrant Map Generation Using Depth Estimation
Sangchocanonta, S., Patchimnan, K., Pooprasert, P., Munthuli, A., Puangarom, S., Phienphanich, P., Itthipanichpong, R., Ratanawongphaibul, K., Chansangpetch, S., Manassakorn, A., et al. (2024) · Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) · doi:10.1109/embc53108.2024.10782592 · Cited by 1
Soulis, K. X., Nikitakis, E., Katsogiannou, A., & Kalivas, D. P. (2024) · AIMS Geosciences · doi:10.3934/geosci.2024044 · Cited by 1
Toward Debugging Deep Reinforcement Learning Programs with RLExplorer
Bouchoucha, R., Yahmed, A. H., Patil, D., Rajendran, J., Nikanjam, A., Chandar, S., & Khomh, F. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance (ICSM) · doi:10.1109/icsme58944.2024.00019 · Cited by 1
Random Multimodal Convolutional Forward Taylor Network for Personality Prediction using MBTI Data
Sabeeha, V., & Alwahhab, A. B. A. (2024) · Journal of Al-Qadisiyah for Computer Science and Mathematics · doi:10.29304/jqcsm.2024.16.41785 · Cited by 1
An Efficient Statistical Inference Approach for Model Calibration Using Griddy Gibbs Sampling
Wright, S. J., Stewart, H., Sharma, S., et al. (2025) · ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems Part B Mechanical Engineering · doi:10.1115/1.4067669 · Cited by 1
Black Box Adversarial Face Transformation Network
Sunderhaft, A., Bhagat, R., Birchwood, J., et al. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-77392-1_25 · Cited by 1
Liu, T., Liu, Z., Zhang, K., et al. (2025) · Unconventional Resources · doi:10.1016/j.uncres.2025.100147 · Cited by 1
Predictive Analysis of Public Transportation Delays Using Machine Learning Models on GTFS Data
Vijaya, A., Gudissa, B. L., Angreani, L. S., & Wicaksono, H. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM) · doi:10.1109/ieem62345.2024.10857111 · Cited by 2
Zakaria, E., Wijaya, D. R., & Gunawan, T. (2023) · doi:10.1109/airosip58759.2023.10873954 · Cited by 1
Imprecise reasoning: extracting precision in imprecision for knowledge discovery in cognitive IoT
Jha, V., & Tripathi, P. (2025) · Iran Journal of Computer Science · doi:10.1007/s42044-025-00236-w · Cited by 1
de Medeiros, G. C., Marcondes, F. S., Oliveira, P., et al. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-80366-6_25 · Cited by 1
Remediation of chaos in cognitive Internet of Things sensor network
Jha, V., & Tripathi, P. (2025) · Ad Hoc Networks · doi:10.1016/j.adhoc.2025.103830 · Cited by 1
The effect of the construction method on the tombolo process at Palabuhanratu seaport
Nugroho, E. O., Riyana, C., Natakusumah, D. K., et al. (2025) · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science · doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1464/1/012019 · Cited by 1
Problem Solving-Oriented Programming Knowledge Tracing from Behavior to Thought
Huang, T., Tang, L., Yang, H., Ou, X., Hu, S., Geng, J., & Hu, J. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp49660.2025.10889146 · Cited by 1
LTOS: Layout-controllable Text-object Synthesis via Adaptive Cross-attention Fusions
Zhao, X., Wu, T., Lai, Y., Tian, Z., Huang, Z., Liu, Y., He, Z., & Li, D. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp49660.2025.10890356 · Cited by 2
Pang, Y., Tang, X., Wang, C., et al. (2025) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su17062488 · Cited by 1
Liu, Z., Shi, Y., Li, C., et al. (2025) · Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences · doi:10.32604/cmes.2025.062426 · Cited by 1
Seun, A. I., Otsuka, Y., Abdelwahab, M. M., & Mahrous, A. M. (2025) · Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics · doi:10.1016/j.jastp.2025.106495 · Cited by 3
Integrating Machine Learning and AI into IoT-Enabled Smart Parking
Knights, V., Petrovska, O., & Prchkovska, M. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-72029-1_5 · Cited by 1
Srivastava, N., & Gohil, B. N. (2025) · Lecture notes in civil engineering · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-1037-2_23 · Cited by 1
A Sentiment-Augmented Machine Learning Approach to Forecasting IHSG Prices Using XGBoost
Wiratama, M. R., Aquarini, N., & Gunawan, P. H. (2025) · International Conference on Advancement in Data Science, E-learning and Information System (ICADEIS) · doi:10.1109/icadeis65852.2025.10933440 · Cited by 1
Comparative Analysis of Transformer and LSTM Networks for Food Production Forecasting
Alkaabi, N., Shakya, S. K., Mizouni, R., et al. (2025) · Studies in computational intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-85252-7_9 · Cited by 1
Shiri, N., Kişi, Ö., Karimi, S., & Shiri, J. (2025) · ISH Journal of Hydraulic Engineering · doi:10.1080/09715010.2025.2485301 · Cited by 1
Tanyildizi-Kökkülünk, H. (2025) · Biomedizinische Technik/Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1515/bmt-2024-0620 · Cited by 1
Enforcing Equity in Neural Climate Emulators
Yik, W., & Silva, S. J. (2025) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2024gl113050 · Cited by 2
Ukekwe, E. C., Ezeora, N. J., Obayi, A. A., et al. (2025) · Computer Applications in Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/cae.70054 · Cited by 1
Reconstructing the upwind field of wind turbines using LiDAR data
Khezri, M., Maghrebi, M. J., Mahmoodi, E., et al. (2025) · Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments · doi:10.1016/j.seta.2025.104382 · Cited by 1
Reducing Bias in Student Peer Evaluation: A Variational Inference Approach
Lazzari, J., Santambrogio, M. D., & Magarini, M. (2025) · IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) · doi:10.1109/educon62633.2025.11016627 · Cited by 1
Phoophiwfa, T., Chomphuwiset, P., Prahadchai, T., Suraphee, S., Volodin, A. I., & Busababodhin, P. (2025) · Lobachevskii Journal of Mathematics · doi:10.1134/s1995080225604953 · Cited by 1
An energy-efficient knowledge discovery in cognitive IoT
Jha, V., & Tripathi, P. (2025) · OPSEARCH · doi:10.1007/s12597-025-00977-z · Cited by 1
Al-Rawabdeh, A., Alzu’bi, F., & Almagbile, A. (2025) · The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science · doi:10.1016/j.ejrs.2025.06.002 · Cited by 1
Prediction of soil thermal conductivity using Zebra algorithm-optimized machine learning model
Yu, B., Lei, Y., & Liu, Y. (2025) · Engineering Computations · doi:10.1108/ec-10-2024-0964 · Cited by 1
Symbolic regression-aided hyperparameter relationship for developing ANN for fragility prediction
Parvizi, M., Nasserasadi, K., & Tafakori, E. (2025) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2025.113485 · Cited by 1
Forecasting Inflation From Disaggregated Data
Martínez‐Rivera, W., González-Molano, E. R., & Caicedo-García, E. (2025) · Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry · doi:10.1002/asmb.70023 · Cited by 1
Using GPT-4o as a factor extractor for Brazilian consumer law judgments*
Pereira, L. D. C. R., Junior, M. M., Santos, G. D. B., Sabo, I. C., Pont, T. R. D., Maurmann, A. S. V., Bollmann, L., Vieira, M. F., Mohr, J. G., Alchini, C. A., et al. (2025) · Artificial Intelligence and Law · doi:10.1007/s10506-025-09466-6 · Cited by 1
Advanced Forecasting of CCPP Output Power Using Regression and Neural Network Models
Baniaghil, S. A., Shah, V. V., Fadia, L., et al. (2025) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-94937-1_7 · Cited by 1
Urcan, H., Cengil, E., & Canayaz, M. (2025) · Natural Hazards · doi:10.1007/s11069-025-07569-6 · Cited by 1
Energy Load Forecasting with Machine Learning: Models, Metrics, and Future Directions
Manzoor, M. F. (2025) · Premier Journal of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.70389/pjai.100018 · Cited by 1
Eroğlu, M., & Aslan, S. (2025) · Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi · doi:10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.1695149 · Cited by 1
Predicting Box Office Revenue Using Machine Learning
Khilari, S., Kawarkhe, R., Khaire, P., et al. (2025) · doi:10.1109/icetetsip64213.2025.11156596 · Cited by 1
Liu, Z., Li, E., & Zhou, J. P. (2025) · Materials Today Communications · doi:10.1016/j.mtcomm.2025.113842 · Cited by 1
Keskin, M. Z., Arra, A. A., Gemici, E., et al. (2025) · Natural Hazards · doi:10.1007/s11069-025-07664-8 · Cited by 1
An Approach to Estimating Cloud Resources Prior to New Business Startup
Hasan, M. M., & Hossain, M. S. (2016) · American Scientific Research Journal for Engineering, Technology, and Sciences · Cited by 1
Wilches-Visbal, J. H., & da Costa, A. M. (2016) · Revista Brasileira de Física Médica · doi:10.29384/rbfm.2016.v10.n3.p7-10 · Cited by 1
Repeatability of force signals in aerial circus straps
Cossin, M., Ross, A., & Gosselin, F. P. (2017) · Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part P Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology · doi:10.1177/1754337117732901 · Cited by 1
Design optimisation for optically tracked pointers
Coninck, B. D., Victor, J. M. K., Baets, P. D., et al. (2017) · International Journal Sustainable Construction & Design · doi:10.21825/scad.v8i1.6805 · Cited by 1
Comparison of PV estimation model with measured PV power output
Kittisontirak, S., Niemcharoen, S., Titiroongruang, W., et al. (2017) · International Electrical Engineering Congress (iEECON) · doi:10.1109/ieecon.2017.8075769 · Cited by 1
Forecasting Thailand’s Exports to ASEAN with Non-linear Models
Boonyakunakorn, P., Pastpipatkul, P., & Sriboonchitta, S. (2017) · Studies in computational intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-70942-0_24 · Cited by 1
Low-quality multivariate spatio-temporal serial data preprocessing
Yu, T., Li, L., Chen, L., et al. (2017) · Cluster Computing · doi:10.1007/s10586-017-1453-8 · Cited by 1
MFCC: An Efficient and Effective Matrix Factorization Model Based on Co-clustering
Yang, W., Wu, L., Liu, X., et al. (2018) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-8530-7_35 · Cited by 1
Kurt, F. E., & Senal, S. (2018) · Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi · doi:10.25095/mufad.465942 · Cited by 1
Gorodetskaya, Y., Goliatt, L., Tavares, G. G., et al. (2018) · doi:10.5753/eniac.2018.4413 · Cited by 1
Ngo, T., Georgescu, V., Gervet, C., Laurent, A., Libourel, T., & Mercier, G. (2019) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-13453-2_8 · Cited by 1
Application of Beta Random Variables to Category-based Collaborative Filtering
Kalamati, H., Akbarzadeh-T, M.-R., & Hossayni, S.-A. (2018) · International Symposium on Telecommunications · doi:10.1109/istel.2018.8661079 · Cited by 1
RESEARCH OF METABOLIC P SYSTEM FIELD PROGRAMMABLE GATE ARRAY IMPLEMENTATION
Kulakovskis, D. (2019) · doi:10.20334/2019-010-m · Cited by 1
Statistical modeling of the assembly of single-layer domes
Lebed, E. V. (2019) · E3S Web of Conferences · doi:10.1051/e3sconf/20199704004 · Cited by 1
Alves, E. D. L. (2019) · Boletim de Geografia · doi:10.4025/bolgeogr.v37i1.37346 · Cited by 1
Mirzaei, S. M., & Amirfakhrian, M. (2019) · Computational and Applied Mathematics · doi:10.1007/s40314-019-0950-1 · Cited by 1
Proposed agorithm for regression-based prediction with bulk noise
Jittawiriyanukoon, C. (2020) · Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science · doi:10.11591/ijeecs.v17.i1.pp543-550 · Cited by 1
Measuring Detection of Signature On Enterprise Computer Network
Alviana, S., & Sumitra, I. D. (2019) · IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering · doi:10.1088/1757-899x/662/5/052008 · Cited by 1
Analysis of Radiosonde Temperature Profile Measurement in Pamengpeuk
Rahayu, S. A., Maryadi, E., Sunarya, R., et al. (2019) · Journal of Physics Conference Series · doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1373/1/012003 · Cited by 1
YÜZ TANIMA SİSTEMLERİNDE DOĞRULUK PERFORMANSLARININ DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ
Aksoy, B. (2019) · Mühendislik Bilimleri ve Tasarım Dergisi · doi:10.21923/jesd.559887 · Cited by 1
Similarity Analysis of IPMC and EMG Signal With Comparative Study of Statistical Features
Paul, A., Dey, N., & Bhattacharya, S. (2020) · Advances in systems analysis, software engineering, and high performance computing book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-2584-5.ch001 · Cited by 1
Distribution of phytoplankton using remote sensing in Cimandiri Estuary, Sukabumi, West Java
Firdaus, F., Pin, T. G., & Supriatna, S. (2020) · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science · doi:10.1088/1755-1315/481/1/012066 · Cited by 1
Jia, Q., Wan, X., Hei, B., et al. (2020) · Remote Sensing Letters · doi:10.1080/2150704x.2020.1752409 · Cited by 1
Quantitative Assessment of the Airway Response to Bronchial Tests Based on a Spirometric Curve Shift
Polak, A. G., Obojski, A., & Mroczka, J. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2020.3004907 · Cited by 1
Yan, B., Cui, H., Fu, H., et al. (2020) · Mathematical Problems in Engineering · doi:10.1155/2020/3876367 · Cited by 1
Giráldez-Cru, J., Chica, M., Cordón, O., & Herrera, F. (2020) · IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.1109/fuzz48607.2020.9177712 · Cited by 1
KAYAKUŞ, M., & ÇEVİK, K. K. (2020) · Journal of Turkish Studies · doi:10.7827/turkishstudies.44299 · Cited by 1
Comparison between transforms a behavior qualitative analysis of various biomedical signals
Sousa, J., Almeida, V. R., Saraiva, A. A., et al. (2020) · Research Society and Development · doi:10.33448/rsd-v9i10.8657 · Cited by 1
Gounder, H., Yaseen, Z. M., & Deo, R. C. (2020) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-817772-3.00007-0 · Cited by 1
Haryanto, T., Jayanegara, A., Febrisahrozi, D., & Kustiyo, A. (2020) · International Conference on Computer Science and Its Application in Agriculture (ICOSICA) · doi:10.1109/icosica49951.2020.9243221 · Cited by 1
Huang, X., Peng, L., Lu, C. Y., Bi, J., & Yuan, H. (2020) · IEEE International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control (ICNSC) · doi:10.1109/icnsc48988.2020.9238105 · Cited by 1
Bus Travel-Time Prediction Based on Deep Spatio-Temporal Model
Zhang, K., Lai, Y., Jiang, L., & Yang, F. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-62005-9_27 · Cited by 1
Incorporating Unsupervised Deep Learning into Meta Learning for Energy Time Series Forecasting
Shahoud, S., Khalloof, H., Düpmeier, C., & Hagenmeyer, V. (2020) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-63128-4_25 · Cited by 2
A semblance measure for model comparison
Commer, M. (2020) · Geophysical Journal International · doi:10.1093/gji/ggaa513 · Cited by 1
Sung, W.-G., choi, J., Yu, J.-J., et al. (2020) · Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society · doi:10.5762/kais.2020.21.10.361 · Cited by 1
Automatic segmentation and quantification of hair follicle orientation
Hussein, S. (2020) · Informatics in Medicine Unlocked · doi:10.1016/j.imu.2020.100498 · Cited by 1
Clustering Analysis to Improve Web Search Ranking Using PCA and RMSE
Ko’adan, M. A., Bamatraf, M., & Sha'Afal, K. Q. (2020) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-6048-4_9 · Cited by 1
Salihu, A. C., Abdulkadir, A., Nsofor, G. N., et al. (2020) · International Journal of Hydrology Research · doi:10.18488/journal.108.2020.51.1.16 · Cited by 1
Sun, X., Jia, X., Zheng, Y., & Wang, Z. (2021) · Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering · doi:10.1631/fitee.2000181 · Cited by 1
Clavon, & Dock, M. (2017) · Cited by 1
Data Mining to Predict COVID-19 Patients’ Recovery on a Balanced Dataset
Valdiviezo-Díaz, P. (2021) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-71503-8_26 · Cited by 1
Physically Based Soap Bubble Synthesis for VR
Yoo, S., Lee, C., & Chin, S. (2021) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app11073090 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Chai, T., & Draxler, R. R.
- Affiliations
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (US)
- Venue
- Geoscientific Model Development
- Publisher
- Copernicus GmbH
- Published
- 2014-06-30
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1247-1250
- ISSN
- 1991-959X (ISSN-L)
- 1991-9603
- OpenAlex
- W2102148524
- Semantic Scholar
- 8c42db1839098b46f18265907464c16e49bb7a1c
- Cited by
- 7,178
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1015 · 2025: 1120 · 2024: 980 · 2023: 873 · 2022: 751 · 2021: 683 · 2020: 538 · 2019: 411 · 2018: 324 · 2017: 235 · 2016: 175 · 2015: 59 · 2014: 13
- FWCI
- 106.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Geoscientific model development (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NA09NES4400006)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Forecasting Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- root mean square error, mean absolute error, model evaluation metrics, error distribution, Gaussian errors, triangle inequality, distance measures, model evaluation, hydrological model evaluation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-17, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-17 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
