The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Utility of daily vs. monthly large-scale climate data: an intercomparison of two statistical downscaling methods
Open accessAbstract
Abstract. Downscaling of climate model data is essential to local and regional impact analysis. We compare two methods of statistical downscaling to produce continuous, gridded time series of precipitation and surface air temperature at a 1/8-degree (approximately 140 km2 per grid cell) resolution over the western U.S. We use NCEP/NCAR Reanalysis data from 1950–1999 as a surrogate General Circulation Model (GCM). The two methods included are constructed analogues (CA) and a bias correction and spatial downscaling (BCSD), both of which have been shown to be skillful in different settings, and BCSD has been used extensively in hydrologic impact analysis. Both methods use the coarse scale Reanalysis fields of precipitation and temperature as predictors of the corresponding fine scale fields. CA downscales daily large-scale data directly and BCSD downscales monthly data, with a random resampling technique to generate daily values. The methods produce generally comparable skill in producing downscaled, gridded fields of precipitation and temperatures at a monthly and seasonal level. For daily precipitation, both methods exhibit limited skill in reproducing both observed wet and dry extremes and the difference between the methods is not significant, reflecting the general low skill in daily precipitation variability in the reanalysis data. For low temperature extremes, the CA method produces greater downscaling skill than BCSD for fall and winter seasons. For high temperature extremes, CA demonstrates higher skill than BCSD in summer. We find that the choice of most appropriate downscaling technique depends on the variables, seasons, and regions of interest, on the availability of daily data, and whether the day to day correspondence of weather from the GCM needs to be reproduced for some applications. The ability to produce skillful downscaled daily data depends primarily on the ability of the climate model to show daily skill.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kharin, V. V., Zwiers, F. W., Zhang, X., & Hegerl, G. C. (2007) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/jcli4066.1 · Cited by 1,103
Cited by
Cannon, A. J., Sobie, S. R., & Murdock, T. Q. (2015) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/jcli-d-14-00754.1 · Cited by 1,700
Seasonal Drought Prediction: Advances, Challenges, and Future Prospects
Hao, Z., Singh, V. P., & Xia, Y. (2018) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1002/2016rg000549 · Cited by 607
Bias-corrected climate projections for South Asia from Coupled Model Intercomparison Project-6
Mishra, V., Bhatia, U., & Tiwari, A. D. (2020) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/s41597-020-00681-1 · Cited by 472
Chien, H., Yeh, P. J.-F., & Knouft, J. H. (2013) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.03.026 · Cited by 202
Masud, M. B., McAllister, T., Cordeiro, M. R. C., & Faramarzi, M. (2018) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.004 · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- Maurer, E. P., & Hidalgo, H. G.
- Venue
- Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
- Publisher
- Copernicus GmbH
- Published
- 2008-03-13
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 551-563
- ISSN
- 1027-5606 (ISSN-L)
- 1607-7938
- OpenAlex
- W2143082107
- Cited by
- 540
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 19.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Utility of daily vs. monthly large-scale climate data: an intercomparison of two statistical downscaling methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5194/hess-12-551-2008
- The paper
- Maurer, E. P., & Hidalgo, H. G. (2008). Utility of daily vs. monthly large-scale climate data: an intercomparison of two statistical downscaling methods. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-12-551-2008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.