The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The European Flood Alert System – Part 1: Concept and development
Open accessAbstract
Abstract. This paper presents the development of the European Flood Alert System (EFAS), which aims at increasing preparedness for floods in trans-national European river basins by providing local water authorities with medium-range and probabilistic flood forecasting information 3 to 10 days in advance. The EFAS research project started in 2003 with the development of a prototype at the European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), in close collaboration with the national hydrological and meteorological services. The prototype covers the whole of Europe on a 5 km grid. In parallel, different high-resolution data sets have been collected for the Elbe and Danube river basins, allowing the potential of the system under optimum conditions and on a higher resolution to be assessed. Flood warning lead-times of 3–10 days are achieved through the incorporation of medium-range weather forecasts from the German Weather Service (DWD) and the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF), comprising a full set of 51 probabilistic forecasts from the Ensemble Prediction System (EPS) provided by ECMWF. The ensemble of different hydrographs is analysed and combined to produce early flood warning information, which is disseminated to the hydrological services that have agreed to participate in the development of the system. In Part 1 of this paper, the scientific approach adopted in the development of the system is presented. The rational of the project, the system�s set-up, its underlying components, basic principles and products are described. In Part 2, results of a detailed statistical analysis of the performance of the system are shown, with regard to both probabilistic and deterministic forecasts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Rainfall–runoff modelling using Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks
(2018) · doi:10.5194/hess-22-6005-2018 · Cited by 2,114
Ensemble flood risk assessment in Europe under high end climate scenarios
Alfieri, L., Feyen, L., Dottori, F., & Bianchi, A. (2015) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.09.004 · Cited by 346
Hybrid forecasting: blending climate predictions with AI models
Slater, L. J., Arnal, L., Boucher, M.-A., Chang, A. Y.-Y., Moulds, S., Murphy, C., Nearing, G., Shalev, G., Shen, C., Speight, L., et al. (2023) · Hydrology and Earth System Sciences · doi:10.5194/hess-27-1865-2023 · Cited by 281
The TIGGE Project and Its Achievements
Swinbank, R., Kyouda, M., Buchanan, P., Froude, L., Hamill, T. M., Hewson, T. D., Keller, J. H., Matsueda, M., Methven, J., Pappenberger, F., et al. (2016) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/bams-d-13-00191.1 · Cited by 265
Moving from drought hazard to impact forecasts
Sutanto, S. J., van der Weert, M., Wanders, N., Blauhut, V., & Van Lanen, H. A. J. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-12840-z · Cited by 144
Metadata
- Authors
- Thielen, J., Bartholmes, J., Ramos, M.-H., & de Roo, A.
- Venue
- Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
- Publisher
- Copernicus GmbH
- Published
- 2009-02-05
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 125-140
- ISSN
- 1027-5606 (ISSN-L)
- 1607-7938
- OpenAlex
- W2012316213
- Cited by
- 549
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 26.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The European Flood Alert System – Part 1: Concept and development. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5194/hess-13-125-2009
- The paper
- Thielen, J., Bartholmes, J., Ramos, M.-H., & de Roo, A. (2009). The European Flood Alert System – Part 1: Concept and development. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-125-2009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.