Cited by 51

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Extraction of thalweg networks from DTMs: application to badlands

Thommeret, N., Bailly, J. S., Puech, C.·2010·Hydrology and Earth System Sciences

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Abstract. To study gully spatial patterns in the badlands using a continuous thalweg vector network, this paper presents methods to extract the badlands' thalweg network from a regular grid digital terrain model (DTM) by combining terrain morphology indices with a drainage algorithm. This method will delineate a thalweg only where the DTM denotes a significant curvature with respect to DTM accuracy and relies on three major steps. First, discontinuous concave areas were detected from the DTM using morphological criteria, either the plan curvature or the convergence index. Second, the concave areas were connected using a drainage algorithm, which provides a continuous, thick, tree-structured scheme. We assumed that these areas were physically significant and corresponded to a gully floor. Finally, the thick path was reduced to its main course and vectorised to obtain a thalweg network. The methods were applied to both virtual and actual DTM cases. The actual case was a LiDAR DTM of the Draix badlands in the French Alps. The obtained networks were quantitatively compared, both with a network obtained using the usual drainage area criteria and with a reference network mapped in the field. The CI-based network showed the great potential for thalweg network extraction.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5194/hess-14-1527-2010

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other geomorphological characteristics can be altered due to changes in watershed delineation, such as the length of the main river, the number of segments, aspect, and slope.

    “Other geomorphological characteristics can also be altered due to changes in watershed delineation, such as the length of the main river, the number of segments, aspect, and slope [60,61].”

    From ANADEM: A Digital Terrain Model for South America (2024) · cites this paper as [60]

    The Discussion and conclusions table reports different total thalweg-network lengths for three extraction methods in the Moulin catchment. That supports the narrower point that how a network is delineated can affect measured length, but it does not establish that changes in watershed delineation alter the main river’s length, segment count, aspect, or slope. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Previous studies demonstrate a loss of drainage delineation accuracy in areas with high vegetation cover.

    “This coincides with previous studies demonstrating a loss of drainage delineation accuracy in areas with high vegetation cover [60,62].”

    From ANADEM: A Digital Terrain Model for South America (2024) · cites this paper as [60]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Bretar, F., Chauve, A., Bailly, J.-S., Mallet, C., and Jacome, A.: Terrain surfaces and 3-D landcover classification from small footprint full-waveform lidar data: application to badlands, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 1531–1544, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-1531-2009, 2009. · DOI
  2. Dodds, P. S. and Rothmann, D. H.: Geometry of river networks I: scaling, fluctuation and deviation, Physical Review E., 63, 016115, 13 pp., 2001. · DOI
  3. Evans, I. S.: General geomorphometry, derivatives of altitude, and descriptive statistics, in: Spatial Analysis in Geomorphology, edited by: Chorley, R. J., Methuen, London, 17–90, 1972. · DOI
  4. Horton, R. E.: Erosional development or streams and their drainage basins: hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology, Bull. Geol. Soc. Am., 56, 275–370, 1945. · DOI
  5. Kiss, R.: Determination of drainage network in digital elevation model, utilities and limitations, Journal of Hungarian Geomathematics, 2, 16–29, 2004.
  6. Lashermes, B., Foufoula-Georgiou, E., and Dietrich, W. E.: Channel network extraction from high resolution topography using wavelets, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L23S04, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL031140, 2007. · DOI
  7. Lea, N. J.: An aspect-driven kinematic algorithm, in: Overland flow: hydraulics and erosion mechanics, edited by: Parson, A. J. and Abrahams, A. D., UCL Press, London, 393–407, 1992.
  8. Martz, L. W. and Garbrecht, J.: Automated recognition of valley lines and drainage networks from grid digital elevation models: a review and a new method–Comment, J. Hydrol., 167, 393–396, 1995. · DOI
  9. Martz, L. W. and Garbrecht J.: An outlet breaching algorithm for the treatment of closed depressions in a raster DEM, Computers & Geosciences, 25(7), 835–844, 1999. · DOI
  10. Molly, I. and Stepinski, T. F.: Automatic mapping of valley networks on Mars, Computers & Geosciences, 33, 728–738, 2007. · DOI
  11. Montgomery, D. R. and Dietrich, W. E.: Landscape dissection and area-slope thresholds, in: Process Models and Theoretical Geomorphology, edited by: Kirkby, M. J., John Wiley, New York, 221–246, 1994.
  12. Montgomery, D. R. and Dietrich, W. E.: Where do channels begins?, Nature, 336, 232–234, 1988. · DOI
  13. O'Callaghan, J. and Mark, D.: The extraction of drainage networks from digital elevation data, Computer vision, graphics and image processing, 28, 323–344, 1984. · DOI
  14. Peuker, T. K. and Douglas, D. H.: Detection of surface-specific points by local parallel processing of discrete terrain elevation data, Computer Graphics Image Processing, 4, 375–387, 1975. · DOI
  15. Pirotti, F. and Tarolli, P.: Suitability if LiDAR point density and derived landform curvature maps for channel network extraction, Hydrol. Processes, 24(9), 1187-1197, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7582, 2010. · DOI
  16. Planchon, O. and Darboux, F.: A fast, simple and versatile algorithm to fill the depression of digital elevation models, Catena, 46, 159–176, 2001. · DOI
  17. Quinn, P. F., Beven, K. J., Chevallier, P., and Planchon, O.: The prediction of hillslope flow paths for distributed hydrological modeling using digital terrain models, Hydrol. Processes, 5, 59–79, 1991 · DOI
  18. Rana, S.: Use of plan curvature variations for the identification of ridges and channels on DEM, Spatial Data Handling Proceedings, 789–804, 2006. · DOI
  19. Tarboton, D. G. and Ames, D. P.: Advances in the mapping of flow networks from digital elevation data, in: Proceedings of World Water and Environmental Resources Congress, Orlando, Florida, 20-24 May, 2001. · DOI
  20. Tarboton, D. G.: A new method for the determination of flow directions and contributing areas in grid digital elevation models, Water Resour. Res., 33(2), 309–319, 1997. · DOI · Paper page
  21. Tarolli, P. and Dalla Fontana, G.: Hillslope to valley transition morphology: new opportunities from high resolution DTMs, Geomorphology, 113, 47–56, 2009. · DOI
  22. Turcotte, R., Fortin, J. P., Rousseau, A. N., Massicotte, S., and Villeneuve J. P.: Determination of the drainage structure of a watershed using a digital elevation model and a digital river and lake network, J. Hydrol., 240, 225–242, 2001. · DOI
  23. Wilson, J. P. and Gallant, J. C. (Eds.): Terrain Analysis, Principles and Applications, John Wiley, New York, 1–28, 2000.
  24. Wilson, J. P., Lam, C. S., and Deng, Y.: Comparison of the performance of flow-routing algorithms used in GIS-based hydrologic analysis, Hydrol. Processes, 21, 1026–144, 2007. · DOI
  25. Wood, J. D.: The geomorphological characterisation of digital elevation models, PhD Thesis, University of Leicester, UK, http://www.soi.city.ac.uk/ jwo/phd, last access: 12 June 2009, 1996.
  26. Zevenbergen, L. W. and Thorne, C. R.: Quantitative analysis of land surface topography, Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 12, 47–56, 1987. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Thommeret, N., Bailly, J. S., & Puech, C.
Venue
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
Published
2010-08-10
Volume
14
Issue
8
Pages
1527-1536
ISSN
1607-7938
Cited by
51
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review