The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Response to Reviewer 2 by Qin et al.
Open accessAbstract
Dear Reviewer
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
Citations
Metadata
- Authors
- Hao, L.
- Corresponding author
- Hao, Lu
- Publisher
- Copernicus GmbH
- Published
- 2017-07-16
- OpenAlex
- W4253820958
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
