Cited by 39Digital Transformation in IndustryFood Supply Chain TraceabilityIoT and Edge/Fog Computing

Digital twin concepts for linking live sensor data with real-time models

Open access
Jedermann, Reiner, Singh, Kunal, Lang, Walter, Mahajan, Pramod·2023·Journal of sensors and sensor systems

Abstract

For taking most advantage of live or real-time sensor measurements, data have to be processed by a single or even by a chain of models on the fly, in contrast to earlier offline simulation solutions. This requirement can be best met by concepts developed under the general term “digital twin” (DT). The step from the Internet of Things (IoT) to a full exploitation of DT solutions entails new challenges but also provides new features, which we discuss based on our example DT solution for remote monitoring of fruit during ocean transportation. A crucial challenge is the transformation of models into an updateable format, necessary to keep the physical object and its modelled representation in sync. A basic new feature of DTs is new software solutions for easy and flexible linking of different models through a streaming platform by implementing an event-driven architecture. We demonstrate a solution for controlling model execution during multiple life cycle phases of the fruit as physical object. An evaluation of response times showed that server performance is sufficient to handle more than 100 DT instances per second.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5194/jsss-12-111-2023

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The interlinking mechanisms include IoT devices, data communication protocols, edge and cloud computing, machine learning algorithms, and feedback control systems.

    “The interlinking mechanisms include IoT devices, data communication protocols, edge and cloud computing, machine learning algorithms, and feedback control systems [26][27][28].”

    From Digital Twins in the IIoT: Current Practices and Future Directions Toward Industry 5.0 (2025) · cites this paper as [28]

    The Streaming platform section describes IoT sensors linked to models through MQTT, Kafka, and publish-subscribe interfaces; the Event-driven architecture section also describes control commands sent back to the physical object. The paper says machine-learning techniques can be applied, but does not establish cloud computing or machine-learning algorithms as components of its interlinking platform. The Platform performance section discusses an embedded computer and a server, which supports part of the computing description but not the full edge-and-cloud claim. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Brown, R. G. and Hwang, P. Y. C.: Introduction to random signals and applied Kalman filtering: with MATLAB exercises, 4th edn., Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, ISBN 978-0-470-60969-9, 2012.
  2. Jedermann, R. and Lang, W.: Model based estimation of biolog- ical heat generation during cold-chain transport and process- ing, 3rd IIR International Conference on Sustainability and the Cold Chain, St Mary's University, Twickenham, London, UK, ISBN 9782362150036, 2014.
  3. Tijskens, L. M. M.: Discovering the Future: Modelling Quality Mat- ters, PhD thesis, Food Quality/Agrotechnology and Food Sci- ences Group and Horticultural Production Chains Group, Uni- versity of Wageningen, ISBN 90-8504-017-5, 2004.
  4. Zarkani, S. and Rasmussen, C. H.: Remote reefer monitoring look- ing back and looking forward, in: Cool Logistics Global, oral presentation, 8th global conference, Bremen, Germany, 27-28 September 2016.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jedermann, R., Singh, K., Lang, W., & Mahajan, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Bremen (DE)
  • Leibniz Institute for Agricultural Engineering and Bioeconomy (DE)
Corresponding author
Jedermann, Reiner
Venue
Journal of sensors and sensor systems
Published
2023-04-11
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
111-121
ISSN
  • 2194-8771 (ISSN-L)
  • 2194-878X
OpenAlex
W4364365683
Cited by
35
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2
FWCI
4.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of sensors and sensor systems (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Bundesministerium für Forschung, Technologie und Raumfahrt (01IA10001)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Supply Chain Traceability
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Keywords
digital twin, real-time sensor data, Internet of Things, event-driven architecture, model linkage, maritime transport, model updating, server response time, remote monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review