The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Estimation uncertainty of direct monetary flood damage to buildings
Open accessAbstract
Abstract. Traditional flood design methods are increasingly supplemented or replaced by risk-oriented methods which are based on comprehensive risk analyses. Besides meteorological, hydrological and hydraulic investigations such analyses require the estimation of flood impacts. Flood impact assessments mainly focus on direct economic losses using damage functions which relate property damage to damage-causing factors. Although the flood damage of a building is influenced by many factors, usually only inundation depth and building use are considered as damage-causing factors. In this paper a data set of approximately 4000 damage records is analysed. Each record represents the direct monetary damage to an inundated building. The data set covers nine flood events in Germany from 1978 to 1994. It is shown that the damage data follow a Lognormal distribution with a large variability, even when stratified according to the building use and to water depth categories. Absolute depth-damage functions which relate the total damage to the water depth are not very helpful in explaining the variability of the damage data, because damage is determined by various parameters besides the water depth. Because of this limitation it has to be expected that flood damage assessments are associated with large uncertainties. It is shown that the uncertainty of damage estimates depends on the number of flooded buildings and on the distribution of building use within the flooded area. The results are exemplified by a damage assessment for a rural area in southwest Germany, for which damage estimates and uncertainty bounds are quantified for a 100-year flood event. The estimates are compared to reported flood damages of a severe flood in 1993. Given the enormous uncertainty of flood damage estimates the refinement of flood damage data collection and modelling are major issues for further empirical and methodological improvements.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Applied nonparametric regression
(1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-0364 · Cited by 2,580
Applied Nonparametric Regression
Härdle, W. (1990) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/ccol0521382483 · Cited by 2,457
Flood damage estimation - A review of urban stage-damage curves and loss functions
Smith, D. I. (1994) · Water SA · Cited by 343
Bristol Floods 1968. Controlled Survey of Effects on Health of Local Community Disaster
Bennet, G. (1970) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.3.5720.454 · Cited by 175
Urban Flood Protection Benefits: A Project Appraisal Guide
Parker, D. J., Green, C. H., & Thompson, P. M. (1987) · Cited by 137
ASSESSING THE THREAT TO LIFE FROM DAM FAILURE1
Brown, C. A., & Graham, W. J. (1988) · JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association · doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.1988.tb03051.x · Cited by 126
Decision Analysis: A Method for Taking Uncertainties into Account in Risk-Based Decision Making
Peterman, R. M., & Anderson, J. L. (1999) · Human and Ecological Risk Assessment An International Journal · doi:10.1080/10807039991289383 · Cited by 123
SUICIDE AFTER NATURAL DISASTERS
Rug, E. T. G. K., Resnow, M. A. J. K., Eddicord, O. P. P., Ahlberg, L., Owell, K. E. E. P., Lex, A., Rosby, E. C., & Oseph, J. (1999) · Cited by 113
Cited by
Review article "Assessment of economic flood damage"
Merz, B., Kreibich, H., Schwarze, R., & Thieken, A. (2010) · Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences · doi:10.5194/nhess-10-1697-2010 · Cited by 1,295
Self-citationUrban flood impact assessment: A state-of-the-art review
Hammond, M. J., Chen, A. S., Djordjević, S., Butler, D., & Mark, O. (2015) · Urban Water Journal · doi:10.1080/1573062x.2013.857421 · Cited by 698
Flood risk analyses—how detailed do we need to be?
Apel, H., Aronica, G. T., Kreibich, H., & Thieken, A. H. (2009) · Natural Hazards · doi:10.1007/s11069-008-9277-8 · Cited by 586
Self-citationFlood maps in Europe – methods, availability and use
de Moel, H., van Alphen, J., & Aerts, J. C. J. H. (2009) · Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences · doi:10.5194/nhess-9-289-2009 · Cited by 503
Comparative flood damage model assessment: towards a European approach
Jongman, B., Kreibich, H., Apel, H., Barredo, J. I., Bates, P. D., Feyen, L., Gericke, A., Neal, J., Aerts, J. C. J. H., & Ward, P. J. (2012) · Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences · doi:10.5194/nhess-12-3733-2012 · Cited by 472
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Merz, B., Kreibich, H., Thieken, A., & Schmidtke, R.
- Venue
- Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
- Publisher
- Copernicus GmbH
- Published
- 2004-03-09
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 153-163
- ISSN
- 1561-8633 (ISSN-L)
- 1684-9981
- OpenAlex
- W2132967462
- Cited by
- 444
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 3.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimation uncertainty of direct monetary flood damage to buildings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5194/nhess-4-153-2004
- The paper
- Merz, B., Kreibich, H., Thieken, A., & Schmidtke, R. (2004). Estimation uncertainty of direct monetary flood damage to buildings. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-4-153-2004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.