The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The use of questionnaires for acquiring information on public perception of natural hazards and risk mitigation – a review of current knowledge and practice
Open accessAbstract
Abstract. Questionnaires are popular and fundamental tools for acquiring information on public knowledge and perception of natural hazards. Questionnaires can provide valuable information to emergency management agencies for developing risk management procedures. Although many natural hazards researchers describe results generated from questionnaires, few explain the techniques used for their development and implementation. Methodological detail should include, as a minimum, response format (open/closed questions), mode of delivery, sampling technique, response rate and access to the questionnaire to allow reproduction of or comparison with similar studies. This article reviews current knowledge and practice for developing and implementing questionnaires. Key features include questionnaire design, delivery mode, sampling techniques and data analysis. In order to illustrate these aspects, a case study examines methods chosen for the development and implementation of questionnaires used to obtain information on knowledge and perception of volcanic hazards in a tourist region in southern Iceland. Face-to-face interviews highlighted certain issues with respect to question structure and sequence. Recommendations are made to overcome these problems before the questionnaires are applied in future research projects. In conclusion, basic steps that should be disclosed in the literature are provided as a checklist to ensure that reliable, replicable and valid results are produced from questionnaire based hazard knowledge and risk perception research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1990) · Cited by 24,217
Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches
Caldas, M. P. (2003) · Revista de Administração Contemporânea · doi:10.1590/s1415-65552003000100015 · Cited by 18,745
Qualitative evaluation and research methods
Ellis, D. (1990) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/0268-4012(90)90041-p · Cited by 17,943
Mackay, A. (2008) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq2008.0015br · Cited by 5,591
Questionnaire Design, Interviewing and Attitude Measurement
Albuam, G., & Oppenheim, A. N. (1993) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3172892 · Cited by 4,971
Losh-Hesselbart, S., & Fowler, F. J. (1985) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2288598 · Cited by 4,764
Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo
Bazeley, P., & Jackson, K. (2007) · Cited by 2,522
Goyder, J., & de Vaus, D. A. (1987) · Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers canadiens de sociologie · doi:10.2307/3340954 · Cited by 2,269
Slovic, P. (2016) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315661773 · Cited by 2,217
Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technical and Environmental Dangers
Robbins, T., Douglas, M., & Wildavsky, A. (1983) · Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion · doi:10.2307/1385678 · Cited by 1,653
Cited by
Perception and Communication of Flood Risks: A Systematic Review of Empirical Research
Kellens, W., Terpstra, T., & De Maeyer, P. (2013) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01844.x · Cited by 759
Bird, D. K., Gisladottir, G., & Dominey-Howes, D. (2010) · Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research · doi:10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2009.09.020 · Cited by 120
Self-citationMercado, R. M. (2016) · Procedia Environmental Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.proenv.2016.04.043 · Cited by 43
Saifudin, I. M. M. Y. (2023) · Journal of Community Empowerment for Health · doi:10.22146/jcoemph.86343 · Cited by 8
Wanda, M., & Pasaribu, P. (2023) · Journal of Business, Management, and Social Studies · doi:10.53748/jbms.v2i3.46 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Bird, D. K.
- Venue
- Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
- Publisher
- Copernicus GmbH
- Published
- 2009-07-31
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1307-1325
- ISSN
- 1561-8633 (ISSN-L)
- 1684-9981
- OpenAlex
- W2126966184
- Cited by
- 364
- References
- 66
- FWCI
- 26.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The use of questionnaires for acquiring information on public perception of natural hazards and risk mitigation – a review of current knowledge and practice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5194/nhess-9-1307-2009
- The paper
- Bird, D. K. (2009). The use of questionnaires for acquiring information on public perception of natural hazards and risk mitigation – a review of current knowledge and practice. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-9-1307-2009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.