Cited by 71Climate Change and GeoengineeringMarine and coastal ecosystemsCO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions

Climate targets, carbon dioxide removal, and the potential role of ocean alkalinity enhancement

Open access
Oschlies, Andreas, Bach, Lennart T., Rickaby, Rosalind E. M., Satterfield, Terre, Webb, Romany, Gattuso, Jean-Pierre·2023·State of the Planet

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Abstract. The Paris Agreement to limit global warming to well below 2 °C requires ambitious emission reduction and the balancing of remaining emissions through carbon sinks, i.e. the deployment of carbon dioxide removal (CDR). While ambitious climate protection scenarios until now consider primarily land-based CDR methods, there is growing concern about their potential to deliver sufficient CDR, and marine CDR options receive more and more interest. Based on idealized theoretical studies, Ocean Alkalinity Enhancement (OAE) appears as a promising marine CDR method. However, the knowledge base is insufficient for a robust assessment of its practical feasibility, of its side effects, social and governance aspects as well as monitoring, reporting and verification issues. A number of research efforts aim to improve this in a timely manner. We provide an overview on the current situation of developing OAE as marine CDR method, and describe the history that has led to the creation of the OAE research Best Practices Guide.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5194/sp-2-oae2023-1-2023

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • OAE induces dynamic shifts in the carbonate chemistry in seawater that may impact marine organism physiology, community composition, and trophic interactions during and/or after equilibration with the atmosphere.

    “OAE induces dynamic shifts in the carbonate chemistry in seawater that may impact marine organism physiology, community composition, and trophic interactions during and/or after equilibration with the atmosphere (Oschlies et al., 2023; Renforth and Henderson, 2017).”

    From Biogeochemical responses to ocean alkalinity enhancement in the North China Sea (2026) · cites this paper as Oschlies et al., 2023

    Section 3 (lines 115–120) explains that OAE changes seawater pH and CO₂ chemistry and promotes air–sea CO₂ exchange. Section 3 (lines 155–165) discusses possible ecological impacts and mentions coral calcification, but our copy does not specify effects on community composition or trophic interactions, or distinguish effects during versus after atmospheric equilibration. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. R. Albright, L. Caldeira, J. Hosfelt, L. Kwiatkowski, J. K. Maclaren, B. M. Mason, Y. Nebuchina, A. Ninokawa, J. Pongratz, K. L. Ricke, T. Rivlin, K. Schneider, M. Sesboue, K. Shamberger, J. Silverman, K. Wolfe, K. Zhu, and K. Caldeira. Reversal 240 of ocean acidification enhances net coral reef calcification. Nature, 531(7594):362-365, 2016.
  2. M. R. Allen, P. Friedlingstein, C. A. J. Girardin, S. Jenkins, Y. Malhi, E. Mitchell-Larson, G. P. Peters, and L. Rajamani. Net zero: Science, origins, and implications. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 47(1):849-887, 2022. 245
  3. D. Archer and V. Brovkin. The millennial atmospheric lifetime of anthropogenic CO2. Climatic Change, 90(3):283-297, 2008.
  4. D. Archer, M. Eby, V. Brovkin, A. Ridgwell, L. Cao, U. Mikolajewicz, K. Caldeira, K. Matsumoto, G. Munhoven, A. Montenegro, and K. Tokos. Atmospheric lifetime of fossil fuel carbon dioxide. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 37(1):117-134, 2009. 250
  5. H. J. Buck, W. Carton, J. F. Lund, and N. Markusson. Why residual emissions matter right now. Nature Climate Change, 255 13(4):351-358, 2023.
  6. C. A. Carlson, N. R. Bates, D. A. Hansell, and D. K. Steinberg. Carbon Cycle, pages 477-486. Academic Press, Oxford, 2001. https://doi.org/10.5194/sp-2023-13 Discussions Preprint. Discussion started: 28 June 2023 c Author(s) 2023. CC BY 4.0 License. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 36(5):e2021GB007246, 2022. · DOI
  7. A. Ferderer, Z. Chase, F. Kennedy, K. G. Schulz, and L. T. Bach. Assessing the influence of ocean alkalinity enhancement on a coastal phytoplankton community. Biogeosciences, 19(23):5375-5399, 2022.
  8. O. Geden and A. Löschel. Define limits for temperature overshoot targets. Nature Geoscience, 10(12):881-882, 2017.
  9. J. Hartmann, N. Suitner, C. Lim, J. Schneider, L. Marin-Samper, J. Aristegui, P. Renforth, J. Taucher, and U. Riebesell. Stability of alkalinity in ocean alkalinity enhancement (OAE) approaches -consequences for durability of CO2 storage. Biogeosciences, 20(4):781-802, 2023. 280
  10. L. D. D. Harvey. Mitigating the atmospheric CO2 increase and ocean acidification by adding limestone powder to upwelling regions. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 113(C4), 2008.
  11. J. Hauck, P. Köhler, D. Wolf-Gladrow, and C. Völker. Iron fertilisation and century-scale effects of open ocean dissolution of 285 olivine in a simulated CO2 removal experiment. Environmental Research Letters, 11(2):024007, 2016.
  12. J. He and M. D. Tyka. Limits and CO2 equilibration of near-coast alkalinity enhancement. Biogeosciences, 20(1):27-43, 2023.
  13. T. Ilyina, D. Wolf-Gladrow, G. Munhoven, and C. Heinze. Assessing the potential of calcium-based artificial ocean 290 alkalinization to mitigate rising atmospheric CO2 and ocean acidification. Geophysical Research Letters, page 2013GL057981, 2013. https://doi.org/10.5194/sp-2023-13 Discussions Preprint. Discussion started: 28 June 2023 c Author(s) 2023. CC BY 4.0 License. D. C. Jones, T. Ito, Y. Takano, and W.-C. Hsu. Spatial and seasonal variability of the air-sea equilibration timescale of carbon dioxide. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 28(11):1163-1178, 2014. 295 · DOI
  14. H. S. Kheshgi. Sequestering atmospheric carbon dioxide by increasing ocean alkalinity. Energy, 20(9):915-922, 1995.
  15. H. D. Matthews, N. P. Gillett, P. A. Stott, and K. Zickfeld. The proportionality of global warming to cumulative carbon emissions. Nature, 459(7248):829-832, 06 2009.
  16. C. A. Moras, L. T. Bach, T. Cyronak, R. Joannes-Boyau, and K. G. Schulz. Ocean alkalinity enhancement -avoiding runaway CaCO3 precipitation during quick and hydrated lime dissolution. Biogeosciences, 19(15):3537-3557, 2022. 310
  17. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2021. A Research Strategy for Ocean-based Carbon Dioxide Removal and Sequestration. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/26278. · DOI
  18. S. Nawaz, G. Peterson St-Laurent, and T. Satterfield. Public evaluations of four approaches to ocean-based carbon dioxide 315 removal. Climate Policy, pages 1-16, 02 2023.
  19. Riebesell et al., 2010: Guide to Best Practices in Ocean Acidification Research and Data Reporting (Eds: Riebesell U., Fabry V. J., Hansson L. & Gattuso J.-P., 2010. 260 p. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union S. M. Smith, O. Geden, G. F. Nemet, M. J. Gidden, W. F. Lamb, C. Powis, R. Bellamy, M. W. Callaghan, A. Cowie, E. Cox, 325 S. Fuss, T. Gasser, G. Grassi, J. Greene, S. Lu ck, A. Mohan, F. Mu ller-Hansen, G. P. Peters, Y. Pratama, T. Repke, K. Riahi, https://doi.org/10.5194/sp-2023-13 Discussions Preprint. Discussion started: 28 June 2023 c Author(s) 2023. CC BY 4.0 License. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oschlies, A., Bach, L. T., Rickaby, R. E. M., Satterfield, T., Webb, R., & Gattuso, J.-P.
Affiliations
  • GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel (DE)
  • University of Tasmania (AU)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Oschlies, Andreas
Venue
State of the Planet
Published
2023-11-27
Volume
2-oae2023
Issue
0
Pages
1-9
ISSN
2752-0706 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4389051022
Cited by
71
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 2
FWCI
7.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • State of the Planet (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Informationszentrum Lebenswissenschaften (ZB MED) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel (GEOMAR) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • ClimateWorks Foundation (22-0296)
  • Prince Albert II of Monaco Foundation (n/a)
  • Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
  • Bundesministerium für Forschung, Technologie und Raumfahrt (03F0895)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Geoengineering
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine and coastal ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
Keywords
ocean alkalinity enhancement, carbon dioxide removal, Paris Agreement, climate targets, greenhouse gas emissions, carbon sink, monitoring and verification, adverse effects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review