Cited by 2Congenital Heart Disease StudiesCardiovascular Conditions and TreatmentsCardiovascular and Diving-Related Complications

Prevalence and pattern of congenital heart disease in South Libya

Open access
Abraheem M. Mansour·2018·Journal of Medical Sciences

Abstract

Aim: This research was performed to study the prevalence of Congenital Heart Disease (CHD) in south Libya.. Data on the prevalence of CHD were collected and analyzed from the major hospital in South Libya from 2015 to 2016. Congenital heart disease is the most common congenital problem in children. Presentation can vary from asymptomatic, accidental finding to severe cardiac decomposition and death. Early recognition has great implications on prognosis. This study was carried out to identify the specific types of CHD, sex and age distribution and the most common pattern of presentation among hospitalized patient. The study also aims at studying age, gender distribution and frequency of congenital heart disease in children referred to echocardiography in Sebha Medical Center.Methods: This is a prospective descriptive study of most patients (inpatient and outpatient) with clinical finding i.e. cyanosis, systolic murmur, family history of CHD, congenital malformation and recurrent chest infection. From September 2015 to September 2016. Infants of diabetic mothers are referred for echocardiography. Patients from day one of life until 14 years are included in the study.Results: Out of the 1600 total cases, 425 (26.5%) were diagnosed with congenital heart disease. There was a male preponderance. There were 219 males and 206 females with a M:Fratio of 1:0.9 The mean age of all the patients with CHD was days. Of the total cases, 116 (26.8%) had patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), 63 (14.8%) had atrial septal defect (ASD), 63 (14.8%) had PR, 56 (13.2%) had ventricular septal defect (VSD), 43 (10.1%) had Mixed CHD, 18 (4.2%) had TR, 15 (3.5%) had IVSH, 13 (3.1%) had Pulmonary stenosis, 11 (2.6%) had tetralogy of fallot (TOF), and 10 (2.4%) had transposition of great arteries (TGA), 8 (1.9%) had aortic stenosis, 4 (0.9%) had AVCD, 1 (0,2%) each was diagnosed to have Truncus arterioses, Coarctation of aorta, Dextrocardia and Aortic regurgitation. Conclusion: The majority of patients with CHD defects had non-cyanotic CHD. TGA is the most common cyanotic lesion and PDA non-cyanotic lesion. In order to avoid complications, early detection of congenital heart disease is of utmost importance for proper treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.51984/joms.v13i1.317

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Authors
Mansour, A. M.
Corresponding author
Abraheem M. Mansour
Venue
Journal of Medical Sciences
Published
2018-12-20
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
17-23
ISSN
  • 2706-9443 (ISSN-L)
  • 2708-8553
OpenAlex
W3015328375
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Sebha University Journal of Medical Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Congenital Heart Disease Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiovascular Conditions and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cardiovascular and Diving-Related Complications
Keywords
congenital heart disease, prevalence, patent ductus arteriosus, atrial septal defect, ventricular septal defect, tetralogy of Fallot, transposition of the great arteries, pulmonary stenosis, sex distribution, age distribution, echocardiography referral, cyanosis, pediatric congenital heart disease, hospitalized patients

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review