A Qualitative Inquiry of Students' and Teachers' Perceptions on Feedback in Three Queensland Secondary Schools
Open accessAbstract
This study qualitatively analyses students' and teachers' perceptions on the effectiveness of formative and summative feedback, using a Critical Systems Theory theoretical framework. By considering feedback content, comparison and mode, this research uncovers perceptions of the strengths, weaknesses and effectiveness of different feedback types. Teacher feedback to students is one of a number of important school-based influences on student achievement. Pre-existing research highlights the benefits and impact of feedback, and the characteristics of effective feedback. However, few studies have investigated students' and teachers' perceptions. This study outlines potential opportunities and strategies to support effective formative and summative feedback practices for secondary school students.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Our review revealed that scholars used different terminology to represent perceptions, including beliefs, conceptions, voice, views, and perspectives.
“Our review (see also Fisk, 2017) revealed that scholars used different terminology to represent perceptions, including beliefs, conceptions, voice, views, and perspectives.”
From The Next Black Box of Formative Assessment: A Model of the Internal Mechanisms of Feedback Processing (2022) · cites this paper as Fisk, 2017
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lui, A. M., & Andrade, H. L. (2022) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2022.751548 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
“Our review (see also Fisk, 2017) revealed that scholars used different terminology to represent perceptions, including beliefs, conceptions, voice, views, and perspectives.”
BackgroundLui, A. M. (2020) · Scholars Archive - University at Albany (University at Albany, State University of New York) · doi:10.54014/7mg3-x499 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Fisk, S. M.
- Affiliations
- Queensland University of Technology (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Fisk, Selena M
- Venue
- Queensland University of Technology
- Publisher
- Queensland University of Technology
- Published
- 2017-01-01
- OpenAlex
- W2767882747
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2020: 1
- Type
- dissertation
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Queensland University of Technology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Communication in Education and Healthcare
- Keywords
- feedback, formative feedback, summative feedback, student perceptions, teacher perceptions, high school students, critical systems theory, feedback effectiveness, academic performance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
