The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Key differences between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0
Open accessAbstract
Web 2.0 is a buzzword introduced in 2003-04 which is commonly used to encompass various novel phenomena on the World Wide Web. Although largely a marketing term, some of the key attributes associated with Web 2.0 include the growth of social networks, bi-directional communication, various 'glue' technologies, and significant diversity in content types. We are not aware of a technical comparison between Web 1.0 and 2.0. While most of Web 2.0 runs on the same substrate as 1.0, there are some key differences. We capture those differences and their implications for technical work in this paper. Our goal is to identify the primary differences leading to the properties of interest in 2.0 to be characterized. We identify novel challenges due to the different structures of Web 2.0 sites, richer methods of user interaction, new technologies, and fundamentally different philosophy. Although a significant amount of past work can be reapplied, some critical thinking is needed for the networking community to analyze the challenges of this new and rapidly evolving environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A stage to engage: Social media use and corporate reputation
Dijkmans, C., Kerkhof, P., & Beukeboom, C. J. (2015) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2014.09.005 · Cited by 515
Adams, S. A. (2010) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.01.006 · Cited by 244
Understanding and Changing Older Adults' Perceptions and Learning of Social Media
Xie, B., Watkins, I., Golbeck, J., & Huang, M. (2012) · Educational Gerontology · doi:10.1080/03601277.2010.544580 · Cited by 195
Hassan, G., Brouillette-Alarie, S., Alava, S., Frau-Meigs, D., Lavoie, L., Fetiu, A., Varela, W., Borokhovski, E., Venkatesh, V., Rousseau, C., et al. (2018) · International Journal of Developmental Science: Biopsychosocial Mechanisms of Change, Human Development, and Psychopathology - Perspectives from Psychology, Neuroscience, and Genetics · doi:10.3233/dev-170233 · Cited by 142
Diagnosis Blog: Checking Up on Health Blogs in the Blogosphere
Miller, E. A., & Pole, A. (2010) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2009.175125 · Cited by 129
Metadata
- Authors
- Cormode, G., & Krishnamurthy, B.
- Venue
- First Monday
- Publisher
- University of Illinois Libraries
- Published
- 2008-04-25
- ISSN
- 1396-0458 (ISSN-L)
- 1396-0466
- OpenAlex
- W2127350894
- Cited by
- 636
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 90.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Key differences between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5210/fm.v13i6.2125
- The paper
- Cormode, G., & Krishnamurthy, B. (2008). Key differences between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0. First Monday. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v13i6.2125
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.