Cited by 48Impact of Technology on AdolescentsSexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyChild Development and Digital Technology

The influence of parental and peer attachment on Internet usage motives and addiction

Open access
Soh, Patrick Chin-Hooi, Charlton, John P., Chew, Kok-Wai·2014·First Monday

Abstract

The impact of parental and peer attachment on four Internet usage motives and Internet addiction was compared using path modelling of survey data from 1,577 adolescent Malaysian school students. The model accounted for 31 percent of Internet addiction score variance. Lesser parental attachment was associated with greater Internet addiction risk. Psychological escape motives were more strongly related to Internet addiction than other motives, and had the largest mediating effect upon the parental attachment–addiction relationship. Peer attachment was unrelated to addiction risk, its main influence on Internet usage motives being encouragement of use for social interaction. It is concluded that dysfunctional parental attachment has a greater influence than peer attachment upon the likelihood of adolescents becoming addicted to Internet–related activities. It is also concluded that the need to relieve dysphoria resulting from poor adolescent–parent relationships may be a major reason for Internet addiction, and that parents’ fostering of strong bonds with their children should reduce addiction risk.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5210/fm.v19i7.5099

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Escapism appears to contribute to addictive behavior online.

    “Escapism appears to contribute to addictive behavior online (Soh et al. 2014).”
  • A stronger parental attachment is related to less motivation to use the internet to escape from everyday problems.

    “findings indicate that a stronger parental attachment is related to less motivation to use the internet to escape from everyday problems (Soh et al. 2014).”
  • Attachment to parents fulfills children's intimacy needs, giving them what they are looking for, and not forcing them to seek escapism.

    “Attachment to parents fulfills children's intimacy needs, giving them what they are looking for, and not forcing them to seek escapism (Mazaheri Nejadfard and Hosseinsabet 2017;Soh et al. 2014).”
  • A gratification model provides a useful framework in which to understand the effects of parental attachment on internet and social media addiction.

    “Thus, the findings presented here suggest that a gratification model provides a useful framework in which to understand the effects of parental attachment on internet and social media addiction (Soh et al. 2014).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Soh, P. C.-H., Charlton, J. P., & Chew, K.-W.
Affiliations
  • Multimedia University (MY)
  • University of Greater Manchester (GB)
Venue
First Monday
Published
2014-07-08
ISSN
  • 1396-0458 (ISSN-L)
  • 1396-0466
OpenAlex
W2117988010
Cited by
48
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • First Monday (publishedVersion)
  • First Monday (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
Keywords
internet addiction, parental attachment, peer attachment, adolescents, parent-child relationship, social interaction motives, dysphoria, Malaysian adolescents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review