Cited by 20Misinformation and Its ImpactsSocial Media and PoliticsMedia Influence and Politics

Manufacturing rage: The Russian Internet Research Agency’s political astroturfing on social media

Open access
Al-Rawi, Ahmed, Rahman, Anis·2020·First Monday

Abstract

This paper examines social media ads purchased by the Russian Internet Research Agency (IRA). Using a public dataset, we employ a mixed method to analyze the thematic and strategic patterns of these ads. Due to Facebook and Instagram’s promotional features, IRA managed to microtarget audiences mostly located in the United States fitting its messages to suit the audiences’ political, racial, gendered, and in some cases religious backgrounds. The findings reveal the divisive nature and topics that are dominant in the dataset including: race, immigration, and police brutality. By expanding on the theoretical conceptualization of astroturfing strategy that focuses on carefully concealing the identity and intention of actors behind social media activities, we argue that IRA has added political astroturfing as a powerful tool at a low cost contributing to the broader Russian geopolitical disinformation campaign strategies. The IRA made use of the business model of Facebook and Instagram in an attempt to further divide its targeted audiences and by highlighting mostly negative issues with a potential goal of fuelling political rage.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5210/fm.v25i9.10801

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Disinformation and astroturfing both mislead the public and can negatively affect public debates, which thereby lose authenticity, but the two phenomena are not intrinsically and systematically linked.

    “Disinformation and astroturfing both mislead the public (Chen et al., 2021) and can negatively affect public debates (García-Orosa, 2021;Schoch et al., 2022), which thereby lose authenticity (Al-Rawi & Rahman, 2020;Chan, 2022;Lits, 2021a;Lock & Seele, 2017), but it does not follow that the two phenomena are intrinsically and systematically linked.”
  • In the literature, astroturfing is often associated with the intention to create the illusion of grassroots public support and backing that exceeds its actual scale.

    “astroturfing is often associated with the intention to create the illusion of grassroots public support and backing that exceeds its actual scale”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Al-Rawi, A., & Rahman, A.
Affiliations
Simon Fraser University (CA)
Venue
First Monday
Published
2020-08-16
ISSN
  • 1396-0458 (ISSN-L)
  • 1396-0466
OpenAlex
W3082019726
Cited by
20
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2021: 3
FWCI
2.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • First Monday (publishedVersion)
  • First Monday (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
Keywords
astroturfing, political disinformation, social media advertising, microtargeting, Facebook, Instagram, political polarization, race and immigration, police brutality, Russian geopolitical strategy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review