The attention economy and the Net
Open accessAbstract
If the Web and the Net can be viewed as spaces in which we will increasingly live our lives, the economic laws we will live under have to be natural to this new space.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
La necesidad de seleccionar a qué insumo informativo procedente de internet se presta atención es un hecho constatable, en la línea de los estudios de Simon (1971), Goldhaber (1997), Shapiro y Varian (1999) y Davenport y Beck (2002), en el contexto del capitalismo cognitivo.
“La necesidad de seleccionar a qué insumo informativo procedente de internet se presta atención es un hecho constatable, que sigue la línea de los estudios de Simon (1971); Goldhaber (1997); Shapiro y Varian (1999) y Davenport y Beck (2002), en el contexto del capitalismo cognitivo ( Guillaud , 2018).”
From Redes sociales y consumo digital en jóvenes universitarios: economía de la atención y oligopolios de la comunicación en el siglo XXI (2020) · cites this paper as Goldhaber (1997)
Attention-economy theory holds that information abundance makes human attention the scarce resource around which communication systems reorganize.
“Attention-economy theory argues that information abundance makes human attention the scarce resource around which communication systems reorganize (Davenport & Beck, 2001;Goldhaber, 1997).”
From Sensational Headlines, Engagement, and Credibility in Nepal’s Online News (2025) · cites this paper as Goldhaber, 1997
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mapping Internet Celebrity on TikTok: Exploring Attention Economies and Visibility Labours
Abidin, C. (2020) · Cultural Science Journal · doi:10.5334/csci.140 · Cited by 564 · see citing works
The power of gifts: organizing social relationships in open source communities
Bergquist, M., & Ljungberg, J. (2001) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2575.2001.00111.x · Cited by 480 · see citing works
Boberg, S., Quandt, T., Schatto-Eckrodt, T., & Frischlich, L. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2004.02566 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
How Visibility and Divided Attention Constrain Social Contagion
Hodas, N. O., & Lerman, K. (2012) · 2012 International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2012 International Confernece on Social Computing · doi:10.1109/socialcom-passat.2012.129 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Baker, P., & Potts, A. (2013) · Critical Discourse Studies · doi:10.1080/17405904.2012.744320 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Giraldo-Luque, S., & Fernández-Rovira, C. (2020) · El profesional de la información · doi:10.3145/epi.2020.sep.28 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Mears, A. (2023) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/20563051231193027 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
“Everything is plentiful-except attention” attention data of scientific journals on social web tools
Kortelainen, T., & Katvala, M. (2012) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2012.06.004 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Heitmayer, M. (2025) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1093/iwc/iwae035 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
“As Goldhaber suggested: ‘Attention transactions, which already are far more numerous than monetary transactions will come to dominate even further.”
InfluentialGeorg Franck’s ‘the economy of attention’: mental capitalism and the struggle for attention
van Krieken, R. (2019) · Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1177/1440783318812111 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Cameron, S., & Hamidzadeh, B. (2024) · Telematics and Informatics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.teler.2024.100135 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Sensational Headlines, Engagement, and Credibility in Nepal’s Online News
Dahal, S. (2025) · Nepalese Journal of Development and Rural Studies · doi:10.3126/njdrs.v22i1.99390
- Authors
- Goldhaber, M. H.
- Corresponding author
- Goldhaber, Michael H.
- Venue
- First Monday
- Publisher
- University of Illinois Libraries
- Published
- 1997-04-07
- ISSN
- 1396-0458 (ISSN-L)
- 1396-0466
- OpenAlex
- W2014790997
- Cited by
- 805
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 51 · 2025: 63 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 73 · 2022: 71 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 58 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 28
- FWCI
- 17.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- First Monday (publishedVersion)
- First Monday (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Digital Media and Philosophy
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Personal Information Management and User Behavior
- Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Information Society and Technology Trends
- Keywords
- attention economy, internet, economic law, digital economy, online life
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review