Cited by 564Media and Digital CommunicationGender, Feminism, and MediaDigital Marketing and Social Media

Mapping Internet Celebrity on TikTok: Exploring Attention Economies and Visibility Labours

Open access
Abidin, Crystal·2020·Cultural Science Journal

Abstract

With its rapid uptake among young people around the world, it is no surprise that TikTok is buzzing with cultures and practices of internet celebrity. Most notably, the platform is becoming more commercial and professionalized with the rise of TikTok Influencers, advertising networks, and agencies dedicated to monetizing content and embedding advertising on TikTok, and top TikTok Influencers raking in millions in income annually. However, little is known about the constitution of internet celebrity on TikTok yet, and existing models of internet celebrity on predecessor apps like Instagram and YouTube do not neatly apply to the distinctive terrain of TikTok. As such, this paper is an exploratory study into the makings of internet celebrity cultures on TikTok, focused on how attention economy and visibility labour practices have emerged as a result of the app’s features. With empirical data drawn from an extended period in-depth digital ethnography, and analyses and insights informed and supported by traditional anthropological participant observation and personal interviews with TikTok Influencers and agencies, this scoping paper offers a foundation for how celebrity, attention, and visibility are constituted across TikTok’s platform norms and features.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5334/csci.140

Cites

42 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Lobato, R. 2018. On discoverability. Flow Journal, 24(8).
  2. Neyaz, A, Kumar, A, Krishnan, S, Placker, J and Liu, Q. 2020. Security, privacy & steganographic analysis of Faceapp & TikTok. International Journal of Computer Science & Security, 14(2): 38-59.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abidin, C.
Affiliations
Curtin University (AU)
Corresponding author
Abidin, Crystal
Venue
Cultural Science Journal
Published
2020-01-01
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
77-103
ISSN
1836-0416 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3123415290
Cited by
564
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 135 · 2025: 133 · 2024: 116 · 2023: 94 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 23
FWCI
21.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cultural Science Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Tencent
  • Curtin University of Technology
  • Australian Research Council (DE190100789)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
Keywords
internet celebrities, TikTok, attention economy, TikTok influencers, influencer marketing, youth, digital labor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review