The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Memory: A Contribution to Experimental Psychology
Open accessAbstract
The first scientific text on the psychology of memory. Relating retention to repetition, describing the shape of the forgetting curve, and measuring strength of association, Hermann Ebbinghaus extended the province of systematic, experimental research to the higher mental processes.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–103 of 103
Evaluating Memory in LLM Agents via Incremental Multi-Turn Interactions
Hu, Y., Wang, Y., & McAuley, J. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.05257 · Cited by 1
FadeMem: Biologically-Inspired Forgetting for Efficient Agent Memory
Wei, L., Peng, X., Dong, X., Xie, N., & Wang, B. (2026) · arXiv
Do Gains from Generative AI-Enabled Adaptive Pretesting Persist? Evidence from a Retention Study
Akgun, M., & Toker, S. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.22328
“Learning science has long distinguished short-term performance improvements from long-term retention, emphasizing that gains observed immediately after instruction may dissipate without continued practice [4].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Ebbinghaus, H.
- Corresponding author
- Ebbinghaus, Hermann
- Venue
- Annals of Neurosciences
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-10-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 155-6
- ISSN
- 0972-7531 (ISSN-L)
- 0976-3260
- PMC
- PMC4117135
- OpenAlex
- W2030007850
- Cited by
- 2,827
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 56 · 2025: 101 · 2024: 110 · 2023: 121 · 2022: 106 · 2021: 131 · 2020: 136 · 2019: 114 · 2018: 103 · 2017: 103 · 2016: 138 · 2015: 149 · 2014: 120 · 2013: 155
- FWCI
- 102.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Annals of Neurosciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › General Psychology › Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Keywords
- memory, retention, repetition, forgetting curve, associative strength, Hermann Ebbinghaus, history of experimental psychology, higher mental functions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review