The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fully Convolutional Crowd Counting on Highly Congested Scenes
Open accessAbstract
In this paper we advance the state-of-the-art for crowd counting in high density scenes by further exploring the idea of a fully convolutional crowd counting model introduced by (Zhang et al., 2016). Producing an accurate and robust crowd count estimator using computer vision techniques has attracted significant research interest in recent years. Applications for crowd counting systems exist in many diverse areas including city planning, retail, and of course general public safety. Developing a highly generalised counting model that can be deployed in any surveillance scenario with any camera perspective is the key objective for research in this area. Techniques developed in the past have generally performed poorly in highly congested scenes with several thousands of people in frame (Rodriguez et al., 2011). Our approach, influenced by the work of (Zhang et al., 2016), consists of the following contributions: (1) A training set augmentation scheme that minimises redundancy among training samples to improve model generalisation and overall counting performance; (2) a deep, single column, fully convolutional network (FCN) architecture; (3) a multi-scale averaging step during inference. The developed technique can analyse images of any resolution or aspect ratio and achieves state-of-the-art counting performance on the Shanghaitech Part B and UCF CC 50 datasets as well as competitive performance on Shanghaitech Part A.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database
Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L.-J., Li, K., & Fei-Fei, L. (2009) · 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2009.5206848 · Cited by 65,333
Cited by
Learning From Synthetic Data for Crowd Counting in the Wild
Wang, Q., Gao, J., Lin, W., & Yuan, Y. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00839 · Cited by 654
CNN-Based cascaded multi-task learning of high-level prior and density estimation for crowd counting
Sindagi, V. A., & Patel, V. M. (2017) · 2017 14th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Video and Signal Based Surveillance (AVSS) · doi:10.1109/avss.2017.8078491 · Cited by 536
Leveraging Unlabeled Data for Crowd Counting by Learning to Rank
Liu, X., van de Weijer, J., & Bagdanov, A. D. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00799 · Cited by 308
PCC Net: Perspective Crowd Counting via Spatial Convolutional Network
Gao, J., Wang, Q., & Li, X. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology · doi:10.1109/tcsvt.2019.2919139 · Cited by 284
Crowd Counting with Deep Negative Correlation Learning
Shi, Z., Zhang, L., Liu, Y., Cao, X., Ye, Y., Cheng, M.-M., & Zheng, G. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00564 · Cited by 283
Metadata
- Authors
- Marsden, M., McGuinness, K., Little, S., & E. O’Connor, N.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 12th International Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics Theory and Applications
- Published
- 2017
- Pages
- 27-33
- OpenAlex
- W2560481731
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.49
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fully Convolutional Crowd Counting on Highly Congested Scenes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5220/0006097300270033
- The paper
- Marsden, M., McGuinness, K., Little, S., & E. O’Connor, N. (2017). Fully Convolutional Crowd Counting on Highly Congested Scenes. Proceedings of the 12th International Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics Theory and Applications. https://doi.org/10.5220/0006097300270033
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.