Cited by 654Video Surveillance and Tracking MethodsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningAdvanced Neural Network Applications

Learning From Synthetic Data for Crowd Counting in the Wild

Open access
Wang, Qi, Gao, Junyu, Lin, Wei, Yuan, Yuan·2019·2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

Abstract

Recently, counting the number of people for crowd scenes is a hot topic because of its widespread applications (e.g. video surveillance, public security). It is a difficult task in the wild: changeable environment, large-range number of people cause the current methods can not work well. In addition, due to the scarce data, many methods suffer from over-fitting to a different extent. To remedy the above two problems, firstly, we develop a data collector and labeler, which can generate the synthetic crowd scenes and simultaneously annotate them without any manpower. Based on it, we build a large-scale, diverse synthetic dataset. Secondly, we propose two schemes that exploit the synthetic data to boost the performance of crowd counting in the wild: 1) pretrain a crowd counter on the synthetic data, then finetune it using the real data, which significantly prompts the model's performance on real data; 2) propose a crowd counting method via domain adaptation, which can free humans from heavy data annotations. Extensive experiments show that the first method achieves the state-of-the-art performance on four real datasets, and the second outperforms our baselines. The dataset and source code are available at https://gjy3035.github.io/GCC-CL/.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr.2019.00839

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Domain adaptation could be useful for AIoT applications when deploying models to new scenarios or new working modes of machines [128], [203], [204], [205], [206], e.g., 'synthetic → real', 'daytime → nighttime' or 'clear → rainy'.

    “Domain adaptation could be useful for AIoT applications when deploying models to new scenarios or new working modes of machines [128], [203], [204], [205], [206], e.g., 'synthetic → real', 'daytime → nighttime' or 'clear → rainy'.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, Q., Gao, J., Lin, W., & Yuan, Y.
Affiliations
Northwestern Polytechnical University (CN)
Venue
2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-06
Pages
8190-8199
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2963693541
Cited by
654
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 103 · 2023: 114 · 2022: 108 · 2021: 117 · 2020: 103 · 2019: 27
FWCI
28.93
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61632018, U1864204, 61773316)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province (U1864204, 2018KJXX‐024)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
crowd counting, synthetic data, synthetic data generation, data annotation, domain adaptation, pre-training and fine-tuning, overfitting, video surveillance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review