The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An Approach to Prediction of Mental Resilience in Fighter Pilot Selection
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Emotionally based strategic communications as a new tool in defensive cognitive warfare
Ćosić, K., Popović, S., & Wiederhold, B. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1751406 · Cited by 4
Self-citationCosic, K., Kuljanac, A., & Palermo, S. (2026) · Frontiers in psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1821242 · Cited by 3
“…stress, fatigue, mental health, stress resilience, attention, working memory, cognitive overload, situational awareness, decision-making capacities and operational readiness which are increasingly recognized as key operational defense capabilities (Ćosić et al., 2022; Palermo, 2020a, 2020b, 2020c).”
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ćosić, K., Popović, S., Šarlija, M., Kesedžić, I., & Gambiraža, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Zagreb (HR)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Cognitive Aircraft Systems
- Published
- 2022
- Pages
- 83-87
- OpenAlex
- W4386433448
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 2.26
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- dx.doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- International Conference on Cognitive Aircraft Systems (ICCAS) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Keywords
- psychological resilience, pilot selection, resilience prediction, aviation personnel selection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
