Cited by 17Network Security and Intrusion DetectionAdversarial Robustness in Machine LearningInformation and Cyber Security

Out of the Cage: How Stochastic Parrots Win in Cyber Security Environments

Open access
Rigaki, Maria, Lukáš, Ondřej, Catania, Carlos, Garcia, Sebastian·2024·Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have gained widespread popularity across diverse domains involving text generation, summarization, and various natural language processing tasks. Despite their inherent limitations, LLM-based designs have shown promising capabilities in planning and navigating open-world scenarios. This paper introduces a novel application of pre-trained LLMs as agents within cybersecurity network environments, focusing on their utility for sequential decision-making processes. We present an approach wherein pre-trained LLMs are leveraged as attacking agents in two reinforcement learning environments. Our proposed agents demonstrate similar or better performance against state-of-the-art agents trained for thousands of episodes in most scenarios and configurations. In addition, the best LLM agents perform similarly to human testers of the environment without any additional training process. This design highlights the potential of LLMs to efficiently address complex decision-making tasks within cybersecurity. Furthermore, we introduce a new network security environment named NetSecGame. The environment is designed to eventually support complex multi-agent scenarios within the network security domain. The proposed environment mimics real network attacks and is designed to be highly modular and adaptable for various scenarios.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5220/0012391800003636

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • LLM agents can achieve performance comparable to or better than extensively trained agents in sequential decision-making tasks, even without additional training.

    “Experiments show that LLM agents can achieve performance comparable to or better than extensively trained agents in sequential decision-making tasks, even without additional training.”

    From When LLMs meet cybersecurity: a systematic literature review (2025) · cites this paper as Rigaki et al. 2024

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rigaki, M., Lukáš, O., Catania, C., & Garcia, S.
Affiliations
  • Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Czech Republic, --- Select a Country ---
  • Czech Technical University in Prague (CZ)
  • Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR)
Venue
Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence
Published
2024
Pages
774-781
OpenAlex
W4392305745
Cited by
17
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5
FWCI
7.42
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence (ICAART) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Ministerstvo Vnitra České Republiky (VJ02010020)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
Keywords
network security, reinforcement learning agents, sequential decision making, network attacks, pre-trained language models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review