PreprintCited by 614Reinforcement Learning in RoboticsArtificial Intelligence in GamesArtificial Intelligence Applications

OpenAI Gym

Open access
Brockman, Greg, Cheung, Vicki, Pettersson, Ludwig, Schneider, Jonas, Schulman, John, Tang, Jie, Zaremba, Wojciech·2016·arXiv

Abstract

OpenAI Gym is a toolkit for reinforcement learning research. It includes a growing collection of benchmark problems that expose a common interface, and a website where people can share their results and compare the performance of algorithms. This whitepaper discusses the components of OpenAI Gym and the design decisions that went into the software.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1606.01540

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SmartPlay takes a suite of benchmarks developed over different times to best represent a broad range of difficulties and skills.

    “SmartPlay takes a suite of benchmarks (Brockman et al., 2016; Hafner, 2021; Fan et al., 2022) developed over different times to best represent a broad range of difficulties and skills.”

    From SmartPlay: A Benchmark for LLMs as Intelligent Agents (2023) · cites this paper as Brockman et al., 2016

  • SmartPlay follows a unified OpenAI Gym interface for all games, with text-based observations, text-based manuals, text describing historical actions and observations, and flat categorical actions.

    “SmartPlay follows a unified OpenAI Gym interface (Brockman et al., 2016) for all games, with text-based observations, text-based manuals with content as described in Table 1, text describing historical actions and observations covering past steps of length 'history length', and flat categorical actions.”

    From SmartPlay: A Benchmark for LLMs as Intelligent Agents (2023) · cites this paper as Brockman et al., 2016

  • OpenAI Gym provides multiple environments for dexterous manipulation.

    “For instance, the Open AI Gym [77], one of the most widely used frameworks for reinforcement learning, provides multiple environments for dexterous manipulation.”
  • The environment layer's APIs are reconfigured into standard OpenAI gym-style environments.

    “They are reconfigured into standard OpenAI gym-style environments [5].”
  • FinRL provides strategy builders with a collection of universal training environments for various trading tasks.

    “Inspired by OpenAI Gym [5], FinRL provides strategy builders with a collection of universal training environments for various trading tasks.”

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brockman, G., Cheung, V., Pettersson, L., Schneider, J., Schulman, J., Tang, J., & Zaremba, W.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2016
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4394666657
Cited by
582
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 93 · 2023: 149 · 2022: 119 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 4
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence in Games
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
Keywords
OpenAI Gym, reinforcement learning, benchmark environments, software design, algorithm comparison, research toolkit

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review