The DOI matches its Crossref record.
ChatGPT in Higher Education: A Risk Management Approach to Academic Integrity, Critical Thinking, and Workforce Readiness
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Relying on AI for assignments leads to superficial learning, where students produce well-structured responses without demonstrating deep understanding or critical engagement.
“Moreover, relying on AI for assignments leads to super -ficial learning, where students produce well-structured responses without demonstrating deep understanding or critical engagement [ 66, 67 ].”
From Redefining student assessment in AI-infused learning environments: a systematic review of challenges and strategies for academic integrity (2026) · cites this paper as [66]
Improving AI detection tools to accurately identify AI-generated content while reducing false positives and negatives is an approach to maintain academic integrity.
“One approach involves improving AI detec -tion tools to accurately identify AI-generated content while reducing false positives and negatives that may affect aca -demic integrity enforcement [ 31, 54, 57, 66, 91, 106].”
From Redefining student assessment in AI-infused learning environments: a systematic review of challenges and strategies for academic integrity (2026) · cites this paper as [66]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ncube, P. D. N., Dzvapatsva, G. P., Matobobo, C., & Ranga, M. M. (2026) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-025-00871-w · Cited by 31
“To maintain academic integrity in an AI-infused environ - ment, there is a growing need to redesign assessment prac - tices in ways that emphasise critical thinking and creativity [ 54, 57, 66, 91 ].”
Influential
Metadata
- Authors
- Chang, V., Ansari, Y., & Arami, M.
- Affiliations
- Aston University (GB)
- Northeastern University London (GB)
- ORCID
- Chang, Victor
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Finance, Economics, Management and IT Business
- Published
- 2024
- Pages
- 79-85
- OpenAlex
- W4396554379
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3
- FWCI
- 1.52
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- International Conference on Finance, Economics, Management and IT Business (FEMIB) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Academic integrity and plagiarism
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Keywords
- ChatGPT, large language models, academic integrity, critical thinking, career readiness, risk management, higher education, generative AI in education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
