Hybrid neural autoencoders for stimulus encoding in visual and other sensory neuroprostheses
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Computational optimization approaches can aid in the development of safe stimulation protocols because they allow faster exploration of the large parameter space and enable task-driven optimization of image processing strategies.
“Computational optimization approaches can also aid in the development of safe stimulation protocols, because they allow a faster exploration of the large parameter space and enable task-driven optimization of image processing strategies (Granley et al., 2022a; Fauvel and Chalk, 2022; White et al., 2019; Küçükoğlu et al., 2022; de Ruyter van Steveninck et al., 2022a; Ghaffari et al., 2021).”
From Towards biologically plausible phosphene simulation for the differentiable optimization of visual cortical prostheses (2024) · cites this paper as Granley et al., 2022a
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
van der Grinten, M., de Ruyter van Steveninck, J., Lozano, A., Pijnacker, L., Rueckauer, B., Roelfsema, P., van Gerven, M., van Wezel, R., Güçlü, U., & Güçlütürk, Y. (2024) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.85812 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
“…is required to condense complex visual information from the surroundings in an intelligible pattern of phosphenes ( de Ruyter van Steveninck et al., 2022a ; Lozano et al., 2020 ; Normann et al., 2009 ; Sanchez-Garcia et al., 2020 ; Troyk, 2017 ; Granley et al., 2022a ; Han et al., 2021 ).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBeyeler, M., & Sanchez-Garcia, M. (2022) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/aca69d · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Self-citationFares, H., Ronchini, M., Zamani, M., Farkhani, H., Chiappalone, M., Neftci, E. O., & Moradi, F. (2026) · npj Biomedical Innovations. · doi:10.1038/s44385-026-00074-w · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Percept-Aware Surgical Planning for Visual Cortical Prostheses with Vascular Avoidance
Pogoncheff, G., Wang, A., Granley, J., & Beyeler, M. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-38236-8_30
Self-citationGhosh, E., Wu, Y., Bahri, H., Pachauri, V., Gao, Z., Stegmaier, J., & Ingebrandt, S. (2026) · physica status solidi (a) · doi:10.1002/pssa.202600002
Scialom, E., Lonnqvist, B., Bornet, A., & Herzog, M. H. (2026) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/ae9227
Renshaw, K. T., & Pezaris, J. S. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197851494.003.0595
Deep Learning–Based Control of Electrically Evoked Activity in Human Visual Cortex
Moure, P., Granley, J., Grani, F., Soo, L., Lozano, A., López-Peco, R., Villamarin-Ortiz, A., Soto-Sanchez, C., Liu, S.-C., Beyeler, M., et al. (2025) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2025.09.24.678361
“This inverse network was trained alongside the forward model (with frozen weights), similar to an autoencoder [30, 33, 34].”
Self-citation
- Authors
- Granley, J., Relic, L., & Beyeler, M.
- Venue
- Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35
- Published
- 2022
- Pages
- 22671-22685
- ISSN
- 1049-5258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W7133218671
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- neural information processing systems (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
- Keywords
- stimulus encoding, neural decoding, artificial retina
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review