Cited by 37Software System Performance and ReliabilitySoftware Engineering ResearchDistributed systems and fault tolerance

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Root Cause Analysis of Failures in Microservices Through Causal Discovery

Ikram, Azam, Chakraborty, Sarthak, Mitra, Subrata, Saini, Shiv, Bagchi, Saurabh, Kocaoglu, Murat·2022·Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.52202/068431-2259

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ikram, A., Chakraborty, S., Mitra, S., Saini, S., Bagchi, S., & Kocaoglu, M.
Venue
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35
Published
2022
Pages
31158-31170
ISSN
1049-5258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7133209642
Cited by
35
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 35
FWCI
0.00
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
neural information processing systems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Software System Performance and Reliability
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Distributed systems and fault tolerance
Keywords
root cause analysis, microservices, causal discovery, fault location, causal inference

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review