The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Improving Spatial Support for Objects via Multiple Segmentations
Open accessAbstract
Sliding window scanning is the dominant paradigm in object recognition research today. But while much success has been reported in detecting several rectangular-shaped object classes (i.e. faces, cars, pedestrians), results have been much less impressive for more general types of objects. Several researchers have advocated the use of image segmentation as a way to get a better spatial support for objects. In this paper, our aim is to address this issue by studying the following two questions: 1) how important is good spatial support for recognition? 2) can segmentation provide better spatial support for objects? To answer the first, we compare recognition performance using ground-truth segmentation vs. bounding boxes. To answer the second, we use the multiple segmentation approach to evaluate how close can real segments approach the ground-truth for real objects, and at what cost. Our results demonstrate the importance of finding the right spatial support for objects, and the feasibility of doing so without excessive computational burden.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Histograms of Oriented Gradients for Human Detection
Dalal, N., & Triggs, B. (2005) · 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2005.177 · Cited by 33,584
Cited by
Edge Boxes: Locating Object Proposals from Edges
Zitnick, C. L., & Dollár, P. (2014) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10602-1_26 · Cited by 2,656
Multiscale Combinatorial Grouping
Arbelaez, P., Pont-Tuset, J., Barron, J., Marques, F., & Malik, J. (2014) · 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2014.49 · Cited by 1,155
Segmentation as selective search for object recognition
van de Sande, K. E. A., Uijlings, J. R. R., Gevers, T., & Smeulders, A. W. M. (2011) · 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.2011.6126456 · Cited by 739
What Makes for Effective Detection Proposals?
Hosang, J., Benenson, R., Dollar, P., & Schiele, B. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2015.2465908 · Cited by 727
Object Recognition in 3D Point Clouds Using Web Data and Domain Adaptation
Lai, K., & Fox, D. (2010) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/0278364910369190 · Cited by 152
Metadata
- Authors
- Malisiewicz, T., & Efros, A. A.
- Venue
- Procedings of the British Machine Vision Conference 2007
- Publisher
- British Machine Vision Association
- Published
- 2007
- Pages
- 55.1-55.10
- OpenAlex
- W2009685382
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.51
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improving Spatial Support for Objects via Multiple Segmentations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5244/c.21.55
- The paper
- Malisiewicz, T., & Efros, A. A. (2007). Improving Spatial Support for Objects via Multiple Segmentations. Procedings of the British Machine Vision Conference 2007. https://doi.org/10.5244/c.21.55
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
