Cited by 739Advanced Image and Video Retrieval TechniquesAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsVisual Attention and Saliency Detection

Segmentation as selective search for object recognition

Open access
van de Sande, Koen E. A., Uijlings, Jasper R. R., Gevers, Theo, Smeulders, Arnold W. M.·2011·2011 International Conference on Computer Vision

Abstract

For object recognition, the current state-of-the-art is based on exhaustive search. However, to enable the use of more expensive features and classifiers and thereby progress beyond the state-of-the-art, a selective search strategy is needed. Therefore, we adapt segmentation as a selective search by reconsidering segmentation: We propose to generate many approximate locations over few and precise object delineations because (1) an object whose location is never generated can not be recognised and (2) appearance and immediate nearby context are most effective for object recognition. Our method is class-independent and is shown to cover 96.7% of all objects in the Pascal VOC 2007 test set using only 1,536 locations per image. Our selective search enables the use of the more expensive bag-of-words method which we use to substantially improve the state-of-the-art by up to 8.5% for 8 out of 20 classes on the Pascal VOC 2010 detection challenge.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iccv.2011.6126456

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van de Sande, K. E. A., Uijlings, J. R. R., Gevers, T., & Smeulders, A. W. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Trento (IT)
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
Venue
2011 International Conference on Computer Vision
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2011-11
Pages
1879-1886
OpenAlex
W2129305389
Cited by
739
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 72 · 2018: 63 · 2017: 89 · 2016: 87 · 2015: 77 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 19
FWCI
26.27
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica (CWI), the national research institute for mathematics and computer science in the Netherlands (submittedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
Keywords
selective search, image segmentation, object recognition, object localization, bag-of-words, Pascal VOC 2007

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review