The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Bioequivalence and safety study of letrozole tablet in healthy Chinese postmenopausal women volunteers
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The modified sensors displayed ultrasensitivity for the quantification of LTZ in plasma samples when compared with the reported method.
“The random analysis of plasma samples demonstrated that the modified sensors displayed ultrasenstivity for the quantification of LTZ when compared with the reported method.”
From Highly Functionalized Modified Metal Oxides Polymeric Sensors for Potentiometric Determination of Letrozole in Commercial Oral Tablets and Biosamples (2021) · cites this paper as [55]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Shawky, A. M., & El-Tohamy, M. F. (2021) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym13091384 · Cited by 34
“CuONPs coated wire sensors in comparison with a reported method [55].”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, Y., & Zhou, D.
- ORCID
- Liu, Yi
- Venue
- Journal of Chinese Pharmaceutical Sciences
- Published
- 2013-03-15
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 1003-1057 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2327124419
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Chinese Pharmaceutical Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Endocrinology › Estrogen and related hormone effects
- Keywords
- letrozole, bioequivalence, drug safety, postmenopausal women, healthy volunteers, aromatase inhibitors, tablet formulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
