Cited by 13Physical Activity and HealthSports and Physical Education StudiesPhysical Education and Sports Studies

Big 10 Institution Campus Recreation: A Review of Current Values, Policies, and Practices

Penn State University, Wilson, Oliver, Guthrie, David, Bopp, Melissa·2020·Journal of Campus Activities Practice and Scholarship

Abstract

Purpose: To systematically examine the institutional values and campus recreational policies and practices of all Big 10 institutions to determine whether equitable physical activity opportunities are being provided. Approach: Websites were systematically searched, and data extracted were analyzed using thematic analysis. Findings: Community (n=13) and diversity and inclusion (n=12), emerged among the most common institutional values. All but one institution funded campus recreation through mandatory student fees. Health and/or wellness (n = 12), recreation, activity, and/or fitness (n=12), and community (n=11) emerged as dominant themes, as did diversity and inclusion (n=9). Despite the proclaimed commitment to diversity and inclusion, one institution offered women-specific programming, and considerably more intramural sport opportunities were available for men. Implications: Findings indicate all students fund shortcomings regarding the provision of equitable student physical activity opportunities, especially given that campus recreation and that institutions purportedly value community, diversity, and inclusion.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.52499/2020014

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous research has utilized the Big Ten sample to study campus recreation, ethnicity diversity, sexual harassment, and transgender policy in HEIs.

    “Previous research has also utilized this sample to study campus recreation [47], ethnicity diversity [48], sexual harassment [49], and transgender policy [50] in HEIs.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Penn State University, Wilson, O., Guthrie, D., & Bopp, M.
Venue
Journal of Campus Activities Practice and Scholarship
Published
2020-09
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
72-79
OpenAlex
W4293119684
Cited by
13
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5
FWCI
1.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Life-span and Life-course Studies › Sports and Physical Education Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Physical Education and Sports Studies
Keywords
campus recreation, institutional values, leisure policy, diversity and inclusion, student fees, gender equity in athletics, community participation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review