Cited by 1Ecocriticism and Environmental LiteratureIndigenous Cultures and HistoryPoetry Analysis and Criticism

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Good Mind and Trans-Systemic Thinking in the Two-Row Poems of Mohawk Poet Peter Blue Cloud

Coleman·2019·Studies in American Indian Literatures

Abstract

The Good Mind and Trans-Systemic Thinking in the Two-Row Poems of Mohawk Poet Peter Blue Cloud Daniel Coleman (bio) This article explores the far-reaching philosophical, environmental, and legal profundity of Peter Blue Cloud's (1933–2011) two-column poems with reference to Haudenosaunee (Six Nations) teachings about the Good Mind. In order to illustrate the far-reaching implications of Blue Cloud's two-column enactments of the Good Mind, I discuss one of the most famous uses of Haudenosaunee two-column thinking in the Two Row Wampum before I turn, toward the end of this article, to Chickasaw legal theorist James (Sa'ke'j) Youngblood Henderson's concept of "trans-systemic" analysis as a way to map out the importance of Two Row thinking for recalibrating relations between Indigenous and settler-colonial legal regimes. But first, one of Blue Cloud's two-column poems: first light First light, a dark outline evening of a mountain peak and too pines their morning scent will carried on first breezes, call, stars a naked brilliance to pulsing to coyote cries sleep And keening chorus, again, a cricket's tentative chirping, the long pauses, mind the fall of an oak leaf is a bird's sudden question, dreaming, that deepest blue of sky mind And now the stars turn is brighter, a a sliver of moon nation followed by a star of And then the pink of morning people sky as vast and open in as a child's dreaming, search, a carpet of leaves, hazy mind grey to mist of yellow is the oak growing a cliff face Creation reaching out for balance, space, a dog bark crawling over a hill, mind a snapping conversation of twigs is and branches in fire, space I wrap myself in morning is as echoes void of a silly dream is linger my mind crowded And I smile to it, lodge, my urine splashes the ground mind sending up an acrid steam, is a long, ribbed cloud I reach for, memory I want to of Soar on hawk wings and whistle a An all-consuming pride, way, I smell the pine and cedar a and the damp morning soil, people a flicker calls, seeking my feet are hooves a I run, law, taking great, soaring great leaps law above the trees, over hills of to meet lasting the sun. peace. (Clans 96–97) [End Page 55] Peter Blue Cloud loved to get up very early, around 3:00 a.m., and write until 6:00 or 7:00 a.m. each day (Blue Cloud, "Talking" 32).1 Like-wise, each of the four two-column poems included in his Clans of Many Nations: Selected Poems 1969–94 (1995) presents a speaker in the pre-dawn hours, attending to the waking earth of the new day. In each of these poems, the left-hand column presents Creation as alive and nurturing, and the speaker himself acknowledges his immersion in and wonder at each detail as the dawn emerges. By contrast with the rich, sensory images of the left-hand columns, the right-hand columns in these poems descend in one-word lines that trace, in very spare language, an essential thought or growing realization that runs like a thread beside the lush imagery of the left-hand column. How are we to read poems laid out like this? Are we to read one column at a time? Should we read some of one column, and then some of the other? Should we read across from left column to right? None of these poems is organized in such a way that the grammar reads smoothly across from one column to the next.2 You can't read Peter Blue Cloud's two-column poems without being confronted with your own habits of thought, your own assumptions about how to make meaning, which are challenged and made conscious by your simultaneous encounter with more than one way of doing things. The only comment by Blue Cloud about this two-column format that I have been able to find appears in the anthology New Voices from the Longhouse (1989), where he explains The visual structure is: seeing it...

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5250/studamerindilite.31.1-2.0054

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Coleman
Corresponding author
Coleman
Venue
Studies in American Indian Literatures
Publisher
Project MUSE
Published
2019
Volume
31
Issue
1-2
Pages
54
ISSN
0730-3238 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2976477564
Cited by
1
References
13
Citations by year
2021: 1
FWCI
2.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Studies in American Indian Literatures (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Poetry Analysis and Criticism
Keywords
Two Row Wampum, Indigenous-settler relations, environmental philosophy, Indigenous sovereignty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review