Understanding Society: Waves 1-8, 2009-2017 and Harmonised BHPS: Waves 1-18, 1991-2009
Open accessAbstract
This release combines eight waves of Understanding Society data with harmonised data from all eighteen waves of the BHPS. As multi-topic studies, the purpose of Understanding Society and BHPS is to understand short- and long-term effects of social and economic change in the UK at the household and individual levels. The study has a strong emphasis on domains of family and social ties, employment, education, financial resources, and health. Understanding Society is an annual survey of each adult member of a nationally representative sample. The same individuals are re-interviewed in each wave approximately 12 months apart. When individuals move they are followed within the UK and anyone joining their households are also interviewed as long as they are living with them. The study has five sample components: the general population sample; a boost sample of ethnic minority group members; an immigrant and ethnic minority boost sample (from wave 6); participants from the BHPS; and the Innovation Panel (which is a separate standalone survey (see SN 6849). The fieldwork period is for 24 months. Data collection primarily uses computer assisted personal interviewing (CAPI), but includes a telephone mop up and from wave 7 of Understanding Society web interviews. One person completes the household questionnaire. Each person aged 16 or older participates in the individual adult interview and self-completed questionnaire. Youths aged 10 to 15 are asked to respond to a paper self-completion questionnaire. For the general and BHPS samples biomarker, genetic and epigenetic data are also available (see SN 7251). Further information may be found on the Understanding Society main stage webpage and links to publications based on the study can be found on the Understanding Society Latest Research webpage. Co-funders In addition to the Economic and Social Research Council, co-funders for the study included the Department of Work and Pensions, the Department for Education, the Department for Transport, the Department of Culture, Media and Sport, the Department for Community and Local Government, the Department of Health, the Scottish Government, the Welsh Assembly Government, the Northern Ireland Executive, the Department of Environment and Rural Affairs, and the Food Standards Agency. End User Licence, Special Licence and Secure Access versions: There are two versions of the main Understanding Society data. One is available under the standard End User Licence (EUL) agreement, and the other is a Special Licence (SL) version. The SL version contains month and year of birth variables instead of just age, more detailed country and occupation coding for a number of variables and various income variables have not been top-coded (see the documentation available with the SL version for more detail on the differences). Users are advised to first obtain the standard EUL version of the data to see if they are sufficient for their research requirements. The SL data have more restrictive access conditions; prospective users of the SL version will need to complete an extra application form and demonstrate to the data owners exactly why they need access to the additional variables in order to get permission to use that version. The SL versions of the main Understanding Society and Innovation Panel studies may be found under SNs 6931 and 7083 respectively. Low- and Medium-level geographical identifiers are also available subject to SL access conditions; see SNs 6666, 6668-6675, 7182, 7453-4, 7629-30, 7245 and 7248-9 (mainstage study) and 6908-6916, 7339 and 7637-41 (Innovation Panel). In addition, a fine detail geographic dataset (SN 6676) is available under more restrictive Secure Access conditions that contains British National Grid postcode grid references (at 1m resolution) for the unit postcode of each household surveyed, derived from the ONS National Statistics Postcode Directory (NSPD). For details on how to make an application for Secure Access dataset, please see the SN 6676 catalogue record. How to access genetic and/or bio-medical sample data from a range of longitudinal surveys: A useful overview of the governance routes for applying for genetic and bio-medical sample data, which are not available through the UK Data Service, can be found at Governance of data and sample access on the title=">METADAC (Managing Ethico-social, Technical and Administrative issues in Data Access) website. Latest edition information For the 11th edition (November 2018), Wave 8 data have been added and some minor changes made to Waves 1-7. With the exception of bw_indresp files, harmonised BHPS files have not been changed for this release. Suitable data analysis software These data are provided by the depositor in Stata format. Users are strongly advised to analyse them in Stata. Transfer to other formats may result in unforeseen issues. Stata SE or MP software is needed to analyse the larger files, which contain over 2,047 variables. Understanding Society (UK Household Longitudinal Study), which began in 2009, is conducted by the Institute for Social and Economic Research (ISER) at the University of Essex and the survey research organisations Kantar Public and NatCen. It builds on and incorporates, the British Household Panel Survey (BHPS), which began in 1991.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Social media’s enduring effect on adolescent life satisfaction
Orben, A., Dienlin, T., & Przybylski, A. K. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1902058116 · Cited by 485 · see citing works
Windows of developmental sensitivity to social media
Orben, A., Przybylski, A. K., Blakemore, S.-J., & Kievit, R. A. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-29296-3 · Cited by 387 · see citing works
A systematic map of research exploring the effect of greenspace on mental health
Collins, R., Spake, R., Brown, K. A., Ogutu, B., Smith, D. M., & Eigenbrod, F. (2020) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103823 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Socioeconomic status and the structure of the self‐concept
Easterbrook, M. J., Kuppens, T., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2020) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12334 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
How people know their risk preference
Arslan, R. C., Brümmer, M., Dohmen, T., Drewelies, J., Hertwig, R., & Wagner, G. G. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-72077-5 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Social Capital and Mental Health Among Black and Minority Ethnic Groups in the UK
Bamford, J., Klabbers, G., Curran, E., Rosato, M., & Leavey, G. (2020) · Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health · doi:10.1007/s10903-020-01043-0 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Socioeconomic patterning of vaping by smoking status among UK adults and youth
Green, M. J., Gray, L., Sweeting, H. N., & Benzeval, M. (2020) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-020-8270-3 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Knies, G. (2021) · Journal of Happiness Studies · doi:10.1007/s10902-021-00457-3 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Lühr, M., Pavlova, M. K., & Luhmann, M. (2021) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-021-02777-6 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Work–family lifecourses and later-life health in the United Kingdom
Tosi, M., & Grundy, E. M. D. (2019) · Ageing and Society · doi:10.1017/s0144686x19001752 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Sexual orientation and life satisfaction
Bartram, D. (2021) · Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1177/14407833211017672 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Fathers’ Perceptions of the Availability of Flexible Working Arrangements: Evidence from the UK
Cook, R., O’Brien, M., Connolly, S., Aldrich, M., & Speight, S. (2020) · Work Employment and Society · doi:10.1177/0950017020946687 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Orben, A. C., Dienlin, T., & Przybylski, A. K. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1909553116 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Rouxel, P. L., Chandola, T., Meena Kumari, B., Seeman, T. E., & Benzeval, M. (2021) · Sociology of Health & Illness · doi:10.1111/1467-9566.13386 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Papachristou, E., Flouri, E., Kokosi, T., & Francesconi, M. (2019) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-019-02143-7 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Early-Life Circumstances, Health Behavior Profiles, and Later-Life Health in Great Britain
van den Broek, T. (2020) · Journal of Aging and Health · doi:10.1177/0898264320981233 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Donnaloja, V. (2020) · Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies · doi:10.1080/1369183x.2020.1715791 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Watts, P. N., Rance, S., McGowan, V. J., Brown, H., Bambra, C. L., Findlay, G., & Harden, A. (2020) · Pilot and Feasibility Studies · doi:10.1186/s40814-020-0550-2 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Maun, E., Glaser, K., & Corna, L. (2019) · Ageing and Society · doi:10.1017/s0144686x1800168x · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Urwin, S., Mason, T., & William, W. (2021) · Health Economics · doi:10.1002/hec.4422 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Aguda, O., & Ebohon, O. J. (2020) · International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis · doi:10.1108/ijhma-03-2020-0026 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
No Evidence That Siblings’ Gender Affects Personality Across Nine Countries
Dudek, T., Brenøe, A., Feld, J., & Rohrer, J. M. (2022) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/09567976221094630 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Does Happiness Foster Social Bonds? A Research Synthesis Using an Online Finding Archive
Sharma, N., Agrawal, S., & Veenhoven, R. (2025) · Journal of Happiness Studies · doi:10.1007/s10902-024-00747-6 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Kuha, J., Zhang, S., & Steele, F. (2023) · The Annals of Applied Statistics · doi:10.1214/22-aoas1680 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Measuring SES-related traits relating to technology usage: Two validated surveys
Chikezie, C., Chanpaisaeng, P., Agarwal, P., Afroz, S., Madhwani, B., Choudhuri, R., Anderson, A. W., Velhal, P., Morreale, P. A., Bogart, C., et al. (2025) · Empirical Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10664-025-10683-5 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
No Evidence that Siblings’ Gender Affects Personality Across Nine CountriesPreprint
Schilling, T. (., Brenøe, A., Feld, J., & Rohrer, J. M. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/vmqsk
- Authors
- University Of Essex, I. F. S.
- Corresponding author
- University Of Essex, Institute For Social
- Venue
- UK Data Service
- Publisher
- UK Data Service
- Published
- 2019
- OpenAlex
- W6967280371
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5
- Type
- dataset
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- UK Data Archive
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Data Analysis and Archiving
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Socioeconomic and Demographic Analysis
- Keywords
- Understanding Society, British Household Panel Survey, socio-economic change, family and social ties, employment, financial resources, ethnic minorities, immigrants, longitudinal survey data, UK households, Innovation Panel
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review