IoT-based supply chain disruption management in Saudi GIGA construction projects: An empirical study of NEOM and QIDDIYA
Open accessAbstract
Under its Vision 2030, Saudi Arabia has heavily invested in mega construction projects such as NEOM and QIDDIYA, where logistics resilience is critical due to environmental, infrastructural, and operational uncertainties. This study proposes an IoT-enabled framework for managing project disruptions via real-time sensing, environmental stress indicators, and predictive modeling. Using a dataset of 1,000 logistics events, multiple statistical and machine learning models were applied to evaluate the impact of IoT deployment on delivery delays caused by disruptions, cost variability, and environmental stress. The findings indicate that IoT integration significantly reduces delay volatility and enhances cost predictability. However, disruptions like traffic and weather partially attenuate these benefits. Environmental stress had a minor but consistent influence on logistics risk exposure. A mediation analysis revealed no significant indirect effect of IoT on delay through environmental stress, suggesting a more direct intervention pathway. A decision dashboard is also proposed to visualize delay triggers and automate risk signaling. Theoretical implications extend the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) to construction logistics, emphasizing real-time sensing as the key performance enabler. Managerial implications suggest full IoT adoption in NEOM and QIDDIYA logistics and real-time SCM dashboarding. Future research may incorporate ensemble learning and edge-based IoT to improve predictive capacity. This study demonstrates the feasibility and strategic value of IoT-based disruption control in transforming mega-infrastructure supply chains.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
- Authors
- Muniruddin, T. I., & Siddiqui, A. W.
- Affiliations
- Al Yamamah University (SA)
- ORCID
- Siddiqui, Atiq W.
- Venue
- Journal of Project Management
- Publisher
- Growing Science
- Published
- 2026
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 669-682
- ISSN
- 2371-8366 (ISSN-L)
- 2371-8374
- OpenAlex
- W7163903327
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Journal of Project Management (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Construction Project Management and Performance
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › BIM and Construction Integration
- Keywords
- Internet of Things, supply chain disruption management, construction logistics, megaprojects, NEOM, logistics resilience, delivery delays, cost predictability, environmental stress, UTAUT, Saudi Vision 2030, real-time sensing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review