The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epidemiologic estimate of the proportion of fatalities related to occupational factors in Finland
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: This study attempts to estimate the proportion of annual deaths related to occupational factors in Finland and considers related methodological issues and associated uncertainties. METHODS: Statistics on causes of death, numbers of subjects exposed, and risk ratios obtained from the epidemiologic literature were used to estimate the population attributable fraction and disease burden for causes of death from work-related diseases. Gender-, age- and disease-specific numbers of deaths were provided by Statistics Finland for 1996. Information on the size of the population, broken down by gender, age, occupation, and industry, was acquired from population censuses. A Finnish job-exposure matrix supplied data on the prevalence of exposure for specific agents and the level of exposure among exposed workers. RESULTS: The attributable fraction of work-related mortality in the relevant disease and age categories was estimated to be 7% (10% for men and 2% for women), and for all diseases and ages the fraction was 4%. For the main cause-of-death categories, the attributable fraction became 12% for circulatory system diseases, 8% for malignant neoplasms, 4% for respiratory system diseases, 4% for mental disorders, 3% for nervous system diseases, and 3% for accidents and violence. The following estimates were obtained for specific important diseases: 24% for lung cancer, 17% for ischemic heart disease, 12% for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and 11% for stroke. Based on these fractions, the total number of work-related deaths that occurred in Finland in 1996 was calculated to be on the order of 1800 (employed work force of 2.1 million); 86% involved men. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality epidemiologic studies and national survey data are essential for obtaining reliable estimates of the proportion of deaths attributable to occupational factors. The magnitude of work-related mortality is an insufficiently recognized contributor to total mortality in Finland, especially from circulatory diseases and other diseases caused by exposure to agents other than asbestos.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Global mortality, disability, and the contribution of risk factors: Global Burden of Disease Study
Murray, C. J., & Lopez, A. D. (1997) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(96)07495-8 · Cited by 4,492
The Causes of Cancer: Quantitative Estimates of Avoidable Risks of Cancer in the United States Today
Doll, R., & Peto, R. (1981) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/66.6.1192 · Cited by 3,927 · cited 6×
“Previously it has been estimated that less than 5% of cancer deaths (and at most 15%) among men and 1% of cancer deaths among women (and no more than 5%) can be attributed to occupational factors (258).”
BackgroundInfluentialUse and misuse of population attributable fractions
Rockhill, B., Newman, B., & Weinberg, C. (1998) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.88.1.15 · Cited by 1,683
PROPORTION OF DISEASE CAUSED OR PREVENTED BY A GIVEN EXPOSURE, TRAIT OR INTERVENTION1
MIETTINEN, O. S. (1974) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a121617 · Cited by 1,036 · cited 8×
“If the unadjusted RR were available, then an unbiased estimate can be obtained by replacing Pc in equation 2 by the expression P × RR / [P (RR – 1) + 1] to obtain (20):”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialEnvironmental tobacco smoke exposure and ischaemic heart disease: an evaluation of the evidence
Law, M. R., Morris, J. K., & Wald, N. J. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7114.973 · Cited by 604
On the Comparable Quantification of Health Risks: Lessons from the Global Burden of Disease Study
Murray, C. J. L., & Lopez, A. D. (1999) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/00001648-199909000-00029 · Cited by 310
Shift work, occupation and coronary heart disease over
Tenkanen, L., Sjöblom, T., Kalimo, R., Alikoski, T., & Härmä, M. (1997) · Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health · doi:10.5271/sjweh.218 · Cited by 194
Cited by
Breast Cancer, Version 4.2017, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology
Gradishar, W. J., Anderson, B. O., Balassanian, R., Blair, S. L., Burstein, H. J., Cyr, A., Elias, A. D., Farrar, W. B., Forero, A., Giordano, S. H., et al. (2018) · Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network · doi:10.6004/jnccn.2018.0012 · Cited by 1,609
Global Estimates of the Burden of Injury and Illness at Work in 2012
Takala, J., Hämäläinen, P., Saarela, K. L., Yun, L. Y., Manickam, K., Jin, T. W., Heng, P., Tjong, C., Kheng, L. G., Lim, S., et al. (2014) · Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene · doi:10.1080/15459624.2013.863131 · Cited by 548
Hnizdo, E. (2002) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwf105 · Cited by 346
Sleep and Metabolism: An Overview
Sharma, S., & Kavuru, M. (2010) · International Journal of Endocrinology · doi:10.1155/2010/270832 · Cited by 272
Asbestos, Smoking and Lung Cancer: An Update
Klebe, S., Leigh, J., Henderson, D. W., & Nurminen, M. (2019) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17010258 · Cited by 170
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Nurminen, M., & Karjalainen, A.
- Venue
- Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health
- Published
- 2001-06
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 161-213
- ISSN
- 0355-3140 (ISSN-L)
- 1795-990X
- OpenAlex
- W2072397545
- Cited by
- 308
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 27.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Epidemiologic estimate of the proportion of fatalities related to occupational factors in Finland. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5271/sjweh.605
- The paper
- Nurminen, M., & Karjalainen, A. (2001). Epidemiologic estimate of the proportion of fatalities related to occupational factors in Finland. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.605
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.