The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Removal of Malachite Green Dye from Aqueous Solution Using Lemon Leaf Powder as an Adsorbent
Abstract
The majority of developing nations experience significant water contamination from textile sector wastewater. The use of low-cost, environmentally friendly adsorbents has been researched as a means of addressing problems of water contamination and high costs for waste - water treatment processes. Malachite green is an incredibly dangerous colour that not only damages mammalian cells but also has a key influence in the growth of liver cancers. The life cycle of aquatic creatures, plants, and people is hampered by dye released into bodies of water without sufficient treatment. In this study, the powdered lemon leaves are utilized for removal of the aniline green dye. By using batch-style setting and design of the experiment (the Box– Behnken technique) adsorbent has been investigated & have been developed to evaluate the process's critical factors, including agitation time, size of adsorbent, dosage of adsorbent, pH, initial concentration and temperature. The acquired values were fitted with adsorption isotherms. Malachite green dye sequestration onto Lemon Leaf Powder was chosen using kinetic models. The results of the trials showed that employing powdered lemon leaves, malachite green could be removed to a maximum of 82.21%. Malachite green dye concentration of 50 mg/L, temp of solution 303 K, and dosage of adsorbent 20 g/L are the ideal parameters. Lemon leaf powders have a maximum sorption capacity (qmax) of 8.08 mg/g. The equilibrium was more accurately modelled using the Freundlich isotherm. When compared to other models, the data which fits the pseudo 2nd order kinetics model is better. Previously researchers had proved several low– cost materials such as wheat bran, marina alga, wood apple shell etc In the current work, to remove malachite green dyes the efficacy of citrus lemon leaves is thoroughly done. The operating parameters that are optimized include dye solution concentration, initial solution pH, sorbent dose, and temperature. Studies on thermodynamics have demonstrated that the adsorption process was endothermic & spontaneous.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The highest sorption capacity (q max ) of lemon leaf powders is 8.08 mg/g [157].”
From Recent Advances in the Remediation of Textile-Dye-Containing Wastewater: Prioritizing Human Health and Sustainable Wastewater Treatment (2024) · cites this paper as [157]
In the citing paper
“The experimental findings indicate that the utilization of powdered lemon leaves resulted in the removal of Malachite Green up to a maximum efficiency of 82.21%.”
From Recent Advances in the Remediation of Textile-Dye-Containing Wastewater: Prioritizing Human Health and Sustainable Wastewater Treatment (2024) · cites this paper as [157]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Journal of Hazardous Materials, 3, 774
- Chemistry Central Journal, 1, 81
- Journal of Saudi Chemical Society, 3, 200
- Dyes and Pigments, 3, 595
- IJRPC, 201, 2
- Dyes and Pigments, 1, 143
- Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research, 1, 284
- Journal of Environmental Management, 4, 1032
- Adsorption of malachite green dye from aqueous solution using corn cob, 0200, 36
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Periyasamy, A. P. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16020495 · Cited by 652
Metadata
- Authors
- Babu, S. B., & Priyanka, S. V.
- Affiliations
- Dept. of Chemical Engineering, S.V. University College of Engineering, Tirupati, India
- Venue
- The Journal of Solid Waste Technology and Management
- Published
- 2023-06-29
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 141-151
- ISSN
- 1088-1697
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review