Cited by 8Music Technology and Sound StudiesMusicology and Musical AnalysisDiverse Musicological Studies

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

Fourteen years of nime: the value and meaning of 'community' in interactive music research

Open access

Abstract

This paper examines the notion of community as commonly employed within NIME discourses. Our aim is to clarify and define the term through the community of practice framework. We argue that through its formal use and application, the notion of community becomes a significant space for the examination of emergent musical practices that could otherwise be overlooked. This paper defines community of practice, as originally developed in the social sciences by Lave and Wegener, and applies it within the NIME context through the examination of existing communities of practice such as the laptop performance community, laptop orchestras, as well as the Satellite CCRMA and Patchblocks communities.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.5281/zenodo.1179128

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Marquez-Borbon, A., & Stapleton, P.
Venue
Zenodo
Publisher
Zenodo
Published
2015-06-01
OpenAlex
W6930149170
Cited by
8
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Music Technology and Sound Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Musicology and Musical Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Diverse Musicological Studies
Keywords
Nîmes, communities of practice, interactive music, laptop performance, laptop orchestra, community definition, Lave and Wenger

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review