Braahms: A Novel Adaptive Musical Interface Based On Users' Cognitive State
Open accessAbstract
We present a novel brain-computer interface (BCI) integrated with a musical instrument that adapts implicitly (with no extra effort from user) to users' changing cognitive state during musical improvisation. Most previous musical BCI systems use either a mapping of brainwaves to create audio signals or use explicit brain signals to control some aspect of the music. Such systems do not take advantage of higher level semantically meaningful brain data which could be used in adaptive systems or without detracting from the attention of the user. We present a new type of real-time BCI that assists users in musical improvisation by adapting to users' measured cognitive workload implicitly. Our system advances the state of the art in this area in three ways: 1) We demonstrate that cognitive workload can be classified in real-time while users play the piano using functional near-infrared spectroscopy. 2) We build a real-time, implicit system using this brain signal that musically adapts to what users are playing. 3) We demonstrate that users prefer this novel musical instrument over other conditions and report that they feel more creative.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cognitive workload is a dynamic measure that fluctuates during a learning task.
“However, cognitive workload is a dynamic measure that fluctuates during a learning task [54].”
From Learn Piano with BACh: An Adaptive Learning Interface that Adjusts Task Difficulty Based on Brain State (2016) · cites this paper as [54]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Brainput: enhancing interactive systems with streaming fnirs brain input
Solovey, E., Schermerhorn, P., Scheutz, M., Sassaroli, A., Fantini, S., & Jacob, R. (2012) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2207676.2208372 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Survey on Measuring Cognitive Workload in Human-Computer Interaction
Kosch, T., Karolus, J., Zagermann, J., Reiterer, H., Schmidt, A., & Woźniak, P. W. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3582272 · Cited by 304 · see citing works
Yuksel, B. F., Oleson, K. B., Harrison, L., Peck, E. M., Afergan, D., Chang, R., & Jacob, R. J. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2858036.2858388 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Self-citationDavanzo, N., & Avanzini, F. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3019978 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
- Authors
- Yuksel, B. F., Afergan, D., Peck, E., Griffin, G., Harrison, L., Chen, N., Chang, R., & Jacob, R.
- Affiliations
- Tufts University (US)
- Venue
- Zenodo
- Publisher
- Zenodo
- Published
- 2015-06-01
- Pages
- 136-139
- OpenAlex
- W2551367023
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 1.67
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- zenodo.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (cc-by)
- New Interfaces for Musical Expression
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1065154, 1218170)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Music Technology and Sound Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
- Keywords
- brain-computer interface, musical improvisation, mental workload, functional near-infrared spectroscopy, real-time classification, piano, musical creativity, user preferences
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review