Cited by 13EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesMusic Technology and Sound StudiesEmotion and Mood Recognition

Braahms: A Novel Adaptive Musical Interface Based On Users' Cognitive State

Open access
Yuksel, Beste Filiz, Afergan, Daniel, Peck, Evan, Griffin, Garth, Harrison, Lane, Chen, Nick, Chang, Remco, Jacob, Robert·2015·Zenodo

Abstract

We present a novel brain-computer interface (BCI) integrated with a musical instrument that adapts implicitly (with no extra effort from user) to users' changing cognitive state during musical improvisation. Most previous musical BCI systems use either a mapping of brainwaves to create audio signals or use explicit brain signals to control some aspect of the music. Such systems do not take advantage of higher level semantically meaningful brain data which could be used in adaptive systems or without detracting from the attention of the user. We present a new type of real-time BCI that assists users in musical improvisation by adapting to users' measured cognitive workload implicitly. Our system advances the state of the art in this area in three ways: 1) We demonstrate that cognitive workload can be classified in real-time while users play the piano using functional near-infrared spectroscopy. 2) We build a real-time, implicit system using this brain signal that musically adapts to what users are playing. 3) We demonstrate that users prefer this novel musical instrument over other conditions and report that they feel more creative.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.5281/zenodo.1181417

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yuksel, B. F., Afergan, D., Peck, E., Griffin, G., Harrison, L., Chen, N., Chang, R., & Jacob, R.
Affiliations
Tufts University (US)
Venue
Zenodo
Publisher
Zenodo
Published
2015-06-01
Pages
136-139
OpenAlex
W2551367023
Cited by
13
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2
FWCI
1.67
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (cc-by)
  • New Interfaces for Musical Expression
Funders
National Science Foundation (1065154, 1218170)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Music Technology and Sound Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
Keywords
brain-computer interface, musical improvisation, mental workload, functional near-infrared spectroscopy, real-time classification, piano, musical creativity, user preferences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review