The DOI matches its DataCite record.
ASReview Dory - New and exciting models for ASReview
Abstract
What's Changed Refactor text input cleaning to adhere to stronger sentence-transformers typechecking by @timovdk in https://github.com/asreview/asreview-dory/pull/47 General maintenance of Dory by @timovdk in https://github.com/asreview/asreview-dory/pull/48 Full Changelog: https://github.com/asreview/asreview-dory/compare/v1.2.2...v1.2.3
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Optimization was conducted leveraging the Optuna package46 (https://github.com/asreview/asreview-optuna), with the goal of minimizing the mean loss across all datasets and prior combinations; see Van der Kuil et al. for the data, scripts, and results.47”
From ASReview LAB v.2: Open-source text screening with multiple agents and a crowd of experts (2025) · cites this paper as [47]
Citations
Cited by
ASReview LAB v.2: Open-source text screening with multiple agents and a crowd of experts
de Bruin, J., Lombaers, P., Kaandorp, C., Teijema, J., van der Kuil, T., Yazan, B., Dong, A., & van de Schoot, R. (2025) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2025.101318 · Cited by 27
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- van der Kuil, T., Teijema, J. J., de Bruin, J., & van de Schoot, R.
- Venue
- Zenodo
- Publisher
- Zenodo
- Published
- 2026-04-28
- References
- 0
- Licence
- opensource.org/licenses/MIT
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ASReview Dory - New and exciting models for ASReview. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5281/zenodo.15649247
- The paper
- van der Kuil, T., Teijema, J. J., de Bruin, J., & van de Schoot, R. (2026). ASReview Dory - New and exciting models for ASReview. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15649247
