A Conceptual Decision Model for Capital Allocation Using Financial Analytics
Open accessAbstract
Capital allocation is central to achieving sustainable financial performance and strategic growth in both private and public enterprises. However, traditional models often rely on static budgeting or intuition-driven prioritization, which can misalign investment with long-term value creation. This review presents a conceptual decision model that integrates financial analytics into the capital allocation process to optimize portfolio decisions under uncertainty. It synthesizes insights from corporate finance, behavioral economics, and computational analytics to illustrate how quantitative models enhance transparency, accountability, and risk-adjusted return evaluation. The proposed framework emphasizes the integration of financial ratio analysis, discounted cash flow (DCF) modeling, sensitivity analysis, and multi-criteria decision methods (MCDM) within a dynamic analytics environment. Additionally, it highlights the role of predictive and prescriptive analytics in identifying capital deployment opportunities, forecasting performance outcomes, and supporting real-time investment rebalancing. By combining data-driven intelligence with managerial judgment, the model provides a structured approach for balancing liquidity constraints, cost of capital, and expected profitability. The paper concludes by identifying implementation challenges, including data integration, governance, and model interpretability, while outlining directions for future research on AI-enhanced decision systems in corporate capital budgeting. This conceptual review contributes to advancing the discourse on analytical capital allocation, bridging strategic finance theory with modern financial analytics applications.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Strategic resource allocation in nonprofits is a core strategic function that shapes what the organization can accomplish, how effectively it can serve beneficiaries, how resilient it remains under financial pressure, and how credibly it can pursue its mission over time.
“It is a core strategic function that shapes what the organization can accomplish, how effectively it can serve its beneficiaries, how resilient it remains under financial pressure, and how credibly it can pursue its mission over time (Lawal & Oduleye, 2021, Oduleye & Medon, 2021, Olamide & Badmus, 2021).”
From Conceptual Model for Financial Sustainability and Strategic Resource Allocation in Nonprofit Organizations (2025) · cites this paper as Lawal & Oduleye, 2021
Section 1.1 describes capital allocation as a critical strategic function linking investment decisions, resource optimization, and long-term value creation. It discusses corporate finance and modern enterprises, however, not nonprofit beneficiaries, mission credibility, or resilience under financial pressure; those parts of the attributed claim are not supported by this paper. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredFinancial stewardship is not merely about protecting money; it is about ensuring that entrusted resources are used in ways that preserve the organization's capacity to fulfill its purpose now and in the future.
“Financial stewardship is not merely about protecting money; it is about ensuring that entrusted resources are used in ways that preserve the organization's capacity to fulfill its purpose now and in the future (Lawal & Oduleye, 2021, Oduro & Omoegun, 2021, Olamide & Badmus, 2021).”
From Conceptual Model for Financial Sustainability and Strategic Resource Allocation in Nonprofit Organizations (2025) · cites this paper as Lawal & Oduleye, 2021
Section 1.1 links allocating limited resources to strategic alignment, sustainability, and long-term value creation. It does not specifically frame this as stewardship of entrusted resources or say that allocation preserves an organization’s capacity to fulfill its purpose now and in the future. (LLM, conf=0.80)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredMission drift often happens not because leaders lack commitment to the mission, but because they are trying to preserve jobs, maintain operations, or avoid closure in difficult financial conditions.
“This often happens not because leaders lack commitment to the mission, but because they are trying to preserve jobs, maintain operations, or avoid closure in difficult financial conditions (Lawal & Oduleye, 2021, Oduleye & Medon, 2021, Olamide & Badmus, 2021).”
From Conceptual Model for Financial Sustainability and Strategic Resource Allocation in Nonprofit Organizations (2025) · cites this paper as Lawal & Oduleye, 2021
The Introduction (§§1.1–1.2; page not provided) discusses capital allocation and decisions under financial uncertainty, but not mission drift or leaders’ efforts to preserve jobs, maintain operations, or avoid closure. Searches for those terms and related phrasing found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.74)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Aliliele, C., Eboh, E. E., & Odihi, F. (2025) · International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science Engineering and Information Technology · doi:10.32628/cseit251117154
- Authors
- Lawal, O. A., & Oduleye, T. E.
- Venue
- Zenodo
- Publisher
- Zenodo
- Published
- 2021-03-15
- OpenAlex
- W7172122471
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Analysis and Corporate Governance
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Capital Investment and Risk Analysis
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Financial Reporting and Valuation Research
- Keywords
- capital allocation, capital budgeting, financial analytics, decision models, financial ratio analysis, discounted cash flow, sensitivity analysis, multi-criteria decision making, predictive analytics, prescriptive analytics, risk-adjusted returns, cost of capital, model interpretability, corporate finance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
