Cited by 79Indian and Buddhist StudiesClassical Studies and PhilologyLinguistics and language evolution

The DOI matches its DataCite record; its reference list is not available.

Indian epigraphy : a guide to the study of inscriptions in Sanskrit, Prakrit, and the other Indo-Aryan languages

Open access
Salomon, Richard·1998·Zenodo

Abstract

Salomon, Richard. Indian Epigraphy: A Guide to the Study of Inscriptions in Sanskrit, Prakrit, and the Other Indo-Aryan Languages. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.5281/zenodo.3524126

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

Cited by 79

Metadata

Authors
Salomon, R.
Corresponding author
Salomon, Richard
Venue
Zenodo
Publisher
Zenodo
Published
1998-02-20
OpenAlex
W4300582455
Cited by
79
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Classical Studies and Philology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and language evolution
Keywords
Indian epigraphy, inscriptions, Sanskrit inscription, Indo-Aryan languages, epigraphic studies, ancient India

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review