The DOI matches its DataCite record.
GIS-BASED COMPARATIVE ARCHAEOLOGICAL PREDICTIVE MODELS: A FIRST APPLICATION TO IRON AGE SITES IN THE BEKAA (LEBANON)
Abstract
This study tests the use of Frequency Ratio (FR), Statistical Index (Wi), and Binary Logistic Regression (BLR) methods for establishing predictive maps for Iron Age sites in the Bekaa (Lebanon). As such it stands as the first attempt to use archaeological predictive modelling on a national level. The models were generated using an archaeological database consisting of 42 Iron Age I and 30 Iron Age II sites located in the Bekaa valley in Lebanon and six geo-environmental factors: distance to rivers, distance to cropland, slope, aspect, elevation, and terrain texture. The accuracy and predictive capacity of these models were tested using Kvamme’s Gain value. The results indicate that the FR method is more reliable in locating areas of archaeological potential than Wi and BLR. The analysis of the FR- and Wi-based models shows that distance to rivers, terrain texture, and elevation provide the most significant classes affecting settlement incidence. On the other hand, in the BLR, distance to crops and distance to rivers are the most statistically significant explanatory variables for identifying areas with high archaeological probability. The archaeological predictive maps produced in this study form a valuable tool for cultural heritage management and any future archaeological investigation of the Bekaa region.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Studies have demonstrated a marked preference for certain altitude ranges which offer more favorable environmental conditions.
“Studies have demonstrated a marked preference for certain altitude ranges which offer more favorable environmental conditions (Abou Diwan, 2020;Cui, 2024;Duffy et al., 2023).”
From Predictive modeling for targeted archaeological survey of arsacid period sites in the iranian borderland region of the araxes river valley (2026) · cites this paper as Abou Diwan, 2020
Machine learning for archaeological predictive modeling is a significantly more rigorous approach compared to subjective decision-making inherent in weighted methods.
“In this study, we followed several recent studies recommending using machine learning for archaeological predictive modeling as a significantly more rigorous approach compared to subjective decision-making inherent in weighted methods (Abou Diwan, 2020;Kvamme, 2023;Yaworsky et al., 2020).”
From Predictive modeling for targeted archaeological survey of arsacid period sites in the iranian borderland region of the araxes river valley (2026) · cites this paper as Abou Diwan, 2020
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wang, J., Soroush, M., Maziar, S., & Khazraee, E. (2026) · Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory · doi:10.1007/s10816-025-09733-5 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Abou Diwan, G.
- Venue
- Zenodo
- Publisher
- Zenodo
- Published
- 2020-06-01
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review