Cited by 2

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

Dataset of first appearances of the scholarly bibliographic references on English Wikipedia articles as of 1 March 2017 and as of 1 October 2021

Kikkawa, Jiro, Takaku, Masao, Fuyuki Yoshikane·2021·Zenodo

Abstract

Abstract We developed a methodology to detect the oldest scholarly reference added to Wikipedia articles by which a certain paper is uniquely identifiable as the "first appearance of the scholarly reference." We identified the first appearances of 923,894 scholarly references (611,119 unique DOIs) in180,795 unique pages on English Wikipedia as of March 1, 2017, and stored them in the dataset. Moreover, we assessed the precision of the dataset, which was and it was a high precision regardless of the research field. In this version, it is available not only the dataset of English Wikipedia as of March 1, 2017, but also English Wikipedia as of October 1, 2021, generated by using the same methodology. Data Records The data format of the dataset is JSON lines, where each line is a single record. In this dataset, we detected the first appearance of each scholarly reference added to Wikipedia articles. If there are multiple references corresponding to the same paper on the same page, only the oldest one is collected. Sample of the record is the following. doi -- DOI corresponding to the paper (String), e.g., "10.1006/anbe.1996.0497" paper_type -- Document type of the paper (String), e.g., "journal-article" paper_container_title -- Journal title, book title, or proceedings title (Array of String), e.g., ["Animal Behaviour"] paper_publisher -- Publisher name (String), e.g., "Elsevier BV" paper_title -- Paper title (Array of String), e.g., ["Push or pull: an experimental study on imitation in marmosets"] paper_published_year -- Published year (String), e.g., "1997" paper_issue -- Issue number (String), e.g., "4" paper_volume -- Volume number (String), e.g., "54" paper_page -- Page numbers (String), e.g., "817-831" paper_author -- Authors information consisted of given and family names, sequences (order in author names), and affiliations (Array of JSON), e.g., [{"given":"THOMAS", "family":"BUGNYAR", "sequence":"first", "affiliation":[]}, {"given":"LUDWIG", "family":"HUBER", "sequence":"additional", "affiliation":[]}] issn -- ISSN related to the paper (Array of String), e.g., ["0003-3472"] research_field -- Research fields from ESI categories (Array of String), e.g., ["PLANT & ANIMAL SCIENCE"] page_id -- Page id (String), e.g., "577858" page_title -- Page title (String), e.g., "Imitation" revision_id -- Revision id (String), e.g., "203309031" revision_timestamp -- Revision timestamp (String), e.g., "2008-04-04 15:54:09 UTC" revision_comment -- Revision comment (edit summary) (String), e.g., "/* Animal Behaviour */" editor_name -- Wikipedia editor's name (String), e.g., "Nicemr" editor_type -- Type of the editor (String), e.g., "User" References Kikkawa, J., Takaku, M. & Yoshikane, F. "Dataset of first appearances of the scholarly bibliographic references on Wikipedia articles", Scientific Data, Vol. 9, Article number 85, pp. 1-11, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01190-z. FUNDING JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP20K12543 JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP21K21303

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.5281/zenodo.5595573

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kikkawa, J., Takaku, M., & Yoshikane, F.
Venue
Zenodo
Publisher
Zenodo
Published
2021-10-19
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review