Cited by 26Space Exploration and TechnologySpaceflight effects on biologyInnovations in Aquaponics and Hydroponics Systems

Choosing Crops For Cultivation In Space

Open access
Dueck, Tom, Kempkes, Frank, Meinen, Esther, Stanghellini, Cecilia·2016·Zenodo

Abstract

Future space missions require bio-regenerative life-support systems. Eating fresh food is not only a fundamental requirement for survival but also influences the psychological well-being of astronauts operating on long duration space missions. Therefore the selection of plants to be grown in space is an important issue. Part of the EDEN ISS project entails the development and application of a methodology to select suitable plants for cultivation on-board the ISS and at its “stand-in” (for this project), the Neumayer III Antarctic station. A methodology was developed taking physical and physiological constraints, and human well-being (quality) aspects into account. It includes a framework for the selection process, a list of relevant criteria based on plant characteristics, engineering constraints and human nutrition and psychology. It entails a scoring system to assess and weigh these criteria for each crop, in order to rank the chosen crops. Human quality aspects, such as taste, texture and appearance were related to the well-being of astronauts. Yield aspects combined crop yield and efficiency in time and space, while production aspects concentrated on physical constraints of the planned growth modules and the technical aspects of cultivation. The methodological framework used for the selection of plants was based on several approaches. Physical and physiological constraints determine whether or not the crop can be cultivated in space (and/or in Antarctica) and all other parameters are prioritized according to human quality aspects, yield or production aspects that were ranked according to pre-selected weighing factors. This yielded a ranking of the crops to be grown in a controlled ecological life support system. A description of the methodology and its results with a choice of crops related to the aims of the EDEN project are given and will be discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.5281/zenodo.60430

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dueck, T., Kempkes, F., Meinen, E., & Stanghellini, C.
Affiliations
Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Venue
Zenodo
Publisher
Zenodo
Published
2016-07-10
ISSN
2663-3027 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2582102254
Cited by
26
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • ThinkTech (Texas Tech University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (cc-by)
Funders
  • European Commission (636501)
  • Wageningen University and Research
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Exploration and Technology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Spaceflight effects on biology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Innovations in Aquaponics and Hydroponics Systems
Keywords
space agriculture, crop selection, CELSS, EDEN ISS, food quality, crop yield, scoring system, long-duration spaceflight

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review